Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Static Universe vs. Big Bang Theory

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by utesfan100 View Post
    It occurs to me that clusters of distant objects can be examined, and if our models are correct the bounding ellipsoids should not have a bias in the radial direction. It turns out such effects have been discussed in the main stream.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fingers_of_God

    Does the existing theory have an unaccounted for radial bias of distant objects, and if so how much plasma redshift would be needed to account for it?
    Having read through the link, I would "assume" that most plasma redshift models would allow for, and acknowledge the moment of objects, including the rotational patterns of suns and galaxies. I would think that such observations would be acknowledged as typical Doppler shift of moving objects, even in a plasma redshift explanation.

  2. #32
    Plasma Redshift has been banned as a Sock of previously banned member Michael Mozina
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

Similar Threads

  1. big bang theory and size of the universe
    By stitt29 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 2011-Jul-29, 02:15 AM
  2. Static Universe
    By davidcrawford in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2011-Apr-19, 07:20 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2011-Apr-13, 04:44 AM
  4. A non-static universe
    By WHITE_HOLE in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-19, 04:34 AM
  5. Static Universe
    By ExpErdMann in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 200
    Last Post: 2005-Oct-15, 02:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •