Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: Do radio waves impact climate change?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    225

    Do radio waves impact climate change?

    Are there any "global warming" theories that point to increased telecommunications / electromagnetic radiation as the culprit instead of co2 emissions?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,319
    Why would electromagnetic radiation cause CO2 emissions?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,218
    Heat is a function of climate change, not emf.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,212
    Quote Originally Posted by TOEfetish View Post
    Are there any "global warming" theories that point to increased telecommunications / electromagnetic radiation as the culprit instead of co2 emissions?
    There's no data that I'm aware of that suggests that. CO2 is the major known player.

    Quote Originally Posted by cjl View Post
    Why would electromagnetic radiation cause CO2 emissions?
    ...instead of co2 emissions?
    ; )
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,201
    Quote Originally Posted by TOEfetish View Post
    Are there any "global warming" theories that point to increased telecommunications / electromagnetic radiation as the culprit instead of co2 emissions?
    Not by anybody who can do 3rd grade arithmetic.
    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    225
    The line of thinking is that em rad (radiowaves and microwaves) are bouncing all around in every direction, trapped by the atmosphere, causing molecules to vibrate like a microwave oven.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,212
    Quote Originally Posted by TOEfetish View Post
    The line of thinking is that em rad (radiowaves and microwaves) are bouncing all around in every direction, trapped by the atmosphere, causing molecules to vibrate like a microwave oven.
    But they aren't trapped by the atmosphere, they mostly dissipate into space. A small fraction bounce off the ionosphere but the amount is too low and the wrong frequency to affect air.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by swampyankee View Post
    Not by anybody who can do 3rd grade arithmetic.
    Not only unhelpful, but extremely rude.
    Last edited by SRH; 2012-Aug-01 at 03:50 AM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
    But they aren't trapped by the atmosphere, they mostly dissipate into space. A small fraction bounce off the ionosphere but the amount is too low and the wrong frequency to affect air.
    Ok thanks...but i didnt mean affect air.
    Like a microwave oven that heats the food....then the food would heat the air.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,212
    Quote Originally Posted by TOEfetish View Post
    Ok thanks...but i didnt mean affect air.
    Like a microwave oven that heats the food....then the food would heat the air.
    There's no evidence of that happening on a signifigant scale. AFAIK there's no measureable heat from everyday RF transmissions intersecting ordinary materials. The microwave frequency used to heat food is used only in very limited circumstances outside ovens.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    225
    Yeah - it would be near impossible to measure the the change in heat due to certain specific em rad vibrating water molecules, in the oceans for example....or glaciers.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,212
    Quote Originally Posted by TOEfetish View Post
    Yeah - it would be near impossible to measure the the change in heat due to certain specific em rad vibrating water molecules, in the oceans for example....or glaciers.
    Actually, ocean temperatures are monitored pretty accurately by IR satellites. Since most frequencies don't penetrate water more than a few inches, seeing the surface temp would give a clear indication if radio heating were happening.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    618
    Radio waves don't violate conservation of energy and the total energy associated with them is tiny compared to the the infrared that is trapped by greenhouse gasses. Averaged out, the various climate forcing (which includes both warming of greenhouse gases + cooling caused by aerosols) come to about 2W per m^2. That's 10^15W, or ~100X greater than total human energy production from all sources of which radio waves are only a very tiny fraction.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,319
    Wow - I'm on a roll. That's my third embarrassing lack of comprehension today...

    As stated above, the atmosphere is basically transparent to the EM waves used for communication (which is why they are used for communication in the first place). As a result, they don't really tend to bounce around very much, nor do they deposit their energy in the atmosphere - most of the energy is simply dissipated into space.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,124
    If they did bounce around that much then most of our RF comms systems would not work due to the massive background noise

    If they were absorbed that significantly by water we would not be able to use them for comms

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,527
    There is the claim about satellite microwave transmissions:

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/sate...nsmissions.htm

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    1,663
    E-m radation we generate is just the same as the heat we generate to keep ourselves warm, indeed that heat is e-m radiation too. We consume energy to create the em radiation, from the usual sources to make electricity. It goes in to the energy balance in teh same way, and is a small component in comparison to uses fo energy such as space heating, transport and heavy industry.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,212
    IIRC the heat given off by the electronics and wiring of a radio transmitter or cell phone are something like 200-300 times the amount of heat generated by its actual radio signal.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,553
    Most radio frequencies used by people to transmit information are the equivalent of what a black body with a temperatures of 0.001-1 Kelvin would radiate. In short, in my opinion, it is about as silly as thinking the Cassini probe can ignite Saturn and turn it into a second Sun.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    a long way away
    Posts
    7,730
    Quote Originally Posted by m1omg View Post
    the Cassini probe can ignite Saturn and turn it into a second Sun.
    OMG! Can that happen?!?

    [hmmm... smileys don't seem to be working: there is one, honest.]

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,553
    Believe it or not man, there actually was such a silly conspiracy theory, not just for Cassini for also for Gallileo.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    19,212
    Quote Originally Posted by m1omg View Post
    Believe it or not man, there actually was such a silly conspiracy theory, not just for Cassini for also for Gallileo.
    There's been a few threads about that. But after seeing the video which used the Silver Surfer as "proof" of interdimensional vortices (Link here, darn it was hilarious!) I now think that any statement no matter how implausible can be turned into a conspiracy theory and someone, somewhere will believe it.
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,201
    Quote Originally Posted by TOEfetish View Post
    Not only unhelpful, but extremely rude.
    You're right, and I apologize.

    At a very rough guess, the total radio emissions is less than 1% of total energy usage (according to Wikipedia total energy usage is about 15 terawatts; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption ), or about 150 gigawatts. Total insolation is about 161 petawatts, so radio emissions would be about 0.0001% of the Earth's radiation budget. Some percentage of the radio emissions will escape. FM, TV, and radars probably contribute over half of the energy of radio emissions, and they are not strongly attenuated -- turned into heat -- by the atmosphere and pass through the ionosphere.
    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    location
    Posts
    10,477
    Sounds like someone's trying to blame AGW on HAARP.
    Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.

  25. #25
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by Ara Pacis View Post
    Sounds like someone's trying to blame AGW on HAARP.
    HAARP doesn't cause AGW. It stops the rotation of the Earth's core. Everyone knows that.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    257
    Quote Originally Posted by primummobile View Post
    HAARP doesn't cause AGW. It stops the rotation of the Earth's core. Everyone knows that.
    Of course you'd say that, it's what the people controlling your mind with HAARP want you to think.

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,525
    The only frequencies that 'bounce' are long wave radio.
    And that doesn't have the power to heat things.

    Ultra-short wave radio (i.e. microwaves) go straight out into the universe.

Similar Threads

  1. Radio Waves
    By kevin1981 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 2011-Sep-11, 01:41 AM
  2. Replies: 131
    Last Post: 2011-Jul-21, 02:47 PM
  3. Radio Waves
    By bruceinwayne in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2009-Apr-04, 05:42 PM
  4. Radio Waves and You.
    By JimHensonsDayDreamer in forum Life in Space
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2007-Mar-28, 01:19 PM
  5. Listen to Radio 4's Overselling Climate Change
    By BobK in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2006-Apr-20, 11:56 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •