Are there any "global warming" theories that point to increased telecommunications / electromagnetic radiation as the culprit instead of co2 emissions?
Are there any "global warming" theories that point to increased telecommunications / electromagnetic radiation as the culprit instead of co2 emissions?
Why would electromagnetic radiation cause CO2 emissions?
Heat is a function of climate change, not emf.
The line of thinking is that em rad (radiowaves and microwaves) are bouncing all around in every direction, trapped by the atmosphere, causing molecules to vibrate like a microwave oven.
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
Yeah - it would be near impossible to measure the the change in heat due to certain specific em rad vibrating water molecules, in the oceans for example....or glaciers.
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
Radio waves don't violate conservation of energy and the total energy associated with them is tiny compared to the the infrared that is trapped by greenhouse gasses. Averaged out, the various climate forcing (which includes both warming of greenhouse gases + cooling caused by aerosols) come to about 2W per m^2. That's 10^15W, or ~100X greater than total human energy production from all sources of which radio waves are only a very tiny fraction.
Wow - I'm on a roll. That's my third embarrassing lack of comprehension today...
As stated above, the atmosphere is basically transparent to the EM waves used for communication (which is why they are used for communication in the first place). As a result, they don't really tend to bounce around very much, nor do they deposit their energy in the atmosphere - most of the energy is simply dissipated into space.
If they did bounce around that much then most of our RF comms systems would not work due to the massive background noise
If they were absorbed that significantly by water we would not be able to use them for comms
There is the claim about satellite microwave transmissions:
http://www.skepticalscience.com/sate...nsmissions.htm
E-m radation we generate is just the same as the heat we generate to keep ourselves warm, indeed that heat is e-m radiation too. We consume energy to create the em radiation, from the usual sources to make electricity. It goes in to the energy balance in teh same way, and is a small component in comparison to uses fo energy such as space heating, transport and heavy industry.
IIRC the heat given off by the electronics and wiring of a radio transmitter or cell phone are something like 200-300 times the amount of heat generated by its actual radio signal.
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
Most radio frequencies used by people to transmit information are the equivalent of what a black body with a temperatures of 0.001-1 Kelvin would radiate. In short, in my opinion, it is about as silly as thinking the Cassini probe can ignite Saturn and turn it into a second Sun.
Believe it or not man, there actually was such a silly conspiracy theory, not just for Cassini for also for Gallileo.
There's been a few threads about that. But after seeing the video which used the Silver Surfer as "proof" of interdimensional vortices (Link here, darn it was hilarious!) I now think that any statement no matter how implausible can be turned into a conspiracy theory and someone, somewhere will believe it.
STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary
You're right, and I apologize.
At a very rough guess, the total radio emissions is less than 1% of total energy usage (according to Wikipedia total energy usage is about 15 terawatts; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption ), or about 150 gigawatts. Total insolation is about 161 petawatts, so radio emissions would be about 0.0001% of the Earth's radiation budget. Some percentage of the radio emissions will escape. FM, TV, and radars probably contribute over half of the energy of radio emissions, and they are not strongly attenuated -- turned into heat -- by the atmosphere and pass through the ionosphere.
Sounds like someone's trying to blame AGW on HAARP.
Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.
The only frequencies that 'bounce' are long wave radio.
And that doesn't have the power to heat things.
Ultra-short wave radio (i.e. microwaves) go straight out into the universe.