Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Sub-atomic sentient life?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    38

    Sub-atomic sentient life?

    The laws of physics change at the sub-atomic level and quantum mechanics is not very well understood from what I can gather. Would it therefore be plausible that sub-atomic chemistry could be sufficiently complex to develop into life or even sentient life? We keep discovering smaller and smaller particles. Maybe there is a Higgs Boson under my fingernail with tiny cities on its surface.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    18,888
    As far as is known, no. We keep discovering that as you get to smaller and smaller subatomic levels, you find simpler and more elemental particles. So there's basically no such thing as "sub-atomic chemistry".
    STARGAZING: All I see are the lights of a billion places I'll never go. --Howard Tayler, Schlock Mercenary

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by Parallel Universes View Post
    The laws of physics change at the sub-atomic level and quantum mechanics is not very well understood from what I can gather. Would it therefore be plausible that sub-atomic chemistry could be sufficiently complex to develop into life or even sentient life? We keep discovering smaller and smaller particles. Maybe there is a Higgs Boson under my fingernail with tiny cities on its surface.
    Curious. What would the cities be made of?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Noclevername View Post
    As far as is known, no. We keep discovering that as you get to smaller and smaller subatomic levels, you find simpler and more elemental particles. So there's basically no such thing as "sub-atomic chemistry".
    Nuclear chemistry might substitute for normal chemistry under extreme conditions like the crust of a neutron star...not really the same thing though, just nuclear forces becoming more relevant than electron shells due to the extreme pressures.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    12,345
    I am reminded of this....
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,256
    Oooh yes, the Microverse!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    325
    May be of relevance:
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/...-in-space.html
    Perhaps reconfiguration of atomic structure and new chemistry!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,801
    If it is possible, I wonder what a sub-atomic creatures sense of time and space would be?
    The laws of physics get a little weird on that small scale.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by ravens_cry View Post
    If it is possible, I wonder what a sub-atomic creatures sense of time and space would be?
    The laws of physics get a little weird on that small scale.
    A little off point, but I remember reading a science fiction book about aliens living on the surface of a neutron star. They had the mass of humans, but were very small because of the intense gravity. (Although larger than they probably should have been) A day for them was equivalent to .2 seconds in our time. They developed hundreds of thousands of years in a couple days.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,801
    Quote Originally Posted by primummobile View Post
    A little off point, but I remember reading a science fiction book about aliens living on the surface of a neutron star. They had the mass of humans, but were very small because of the intense gravity. (Although larger than they probably should have been) A day for them was equivalent to .2 seconds in our time. They developed hundreds of thousands of years in a couple days.
    Star Trek Voyager had a similar themed episode where time passed extremely fast for the inhabitants of the planet. It was an especial favourite because it involved a primitive (i.e. contemporary) technology spacecraft.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by ravens_cry View Post
    Star Trek Voyager had a similar themed episode where time passed extremely fast for the inhabitants of the planet. It was an especial favourite because it involved a primitive (i.e. contemporary) technology spacecraft.
    I hadn't seen that one, so I looked it up yesterday and watched it. It was pretty good. It was just a little annoying that the conversion factor between our time and theirs wasn't applied consistently.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    4,581
    Quote Originally Posted by primummobile View Post
    A little off point, but I remember reading a science fiction book about aliens living on the surface of a neutron star. They had the mass of humans, but were very small because of the intense gravity. (Although larger than they probably should have been) A day for them was equivalent to .2 seconds in our time. They developed hundreds of thousands of years in a couple days.
    Robert Forward's Dragon's Egg, which he described as "a textbook on neutron star physics disguised as a novel". Since Forward was a physicist, all the details are at least plausible and pretty well grounded in known physics. It's a great book.
    Conserve energy. Commute with the Hamiltonian.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    762
    Quote Originally Posted by Grey View Post
    Robert Forward's Dragon's Egg, which he described as "a textbook on neutron star physics disguised as a novel". Since Forward was a physicist, all the details are at least plausible and pretty well grounded in known physics. It's a great book.
    Yeah, that's it. Thanks. Actually I think I have it somewhere in this mess of books....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,835
    One highly speculative idea that might allow fantastically small civilisations would be monopolium;
    http://www.frc.ri.cmu.edu/~hpm/proje...981/monpol.mss
    a (probably) fictional form of matter consisting of different types of monopoles condensed into atoms. Even monopolium isn't small enough to allow entire civilisations on a single boson, though; a human made from monopolium would be a micron high, about the size of a bacterium.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    325
    Currently, from a scientific point of view, no scientific cause is said to exist to define the main reason by which large structures( stars, planets, animals,......humans) have come into existence. However science attributes some of it to molecular structures. Perhaps subatomic sub-elements play the greatest contribution in the creation of molecular and also large structures. One day humans may develop the largest animated structure in the universe! Yes? In comparison they seem to be minute and highly sub element.
    Last edited by KhashayarShatti; 2012-Jul-29 at 03:55 PM.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    279
    I am reminded of the first MiB movie. At the end, the cat is wearing a necklace of a galaxy. Then, it is revealed that some alien child is playing with a toy within which is our own universe. Ifcourse, the alien's universe is itself within yet another toy. etc. infinitum...

Similar Threads

  1. What is a Hyper-Sentient Being?
    By Gamefreak89 in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2011-Feb-01, 12:45 PM
  2. Sentient computer vs. sentient computer program
    By Ilya in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 2008-Sep-02, 10:54 PM
  3. Birds Sentient/Intelligent
    By Stylesjl in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 2004-Jan-28, 06:48 PM
  4. Sentient Meat
    By BigJim in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2003-Jul-20, 04:44 AM
  5. Sentient Meat
    By amstrad in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2002-Jan-18, 05:14 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •