
Originally Posted by
NEOWatcher
Are we speaking about writing it that way, or people saying it?
I don't know any other way to pronounce could've as anything else but "could of". (actually "could ov" with the o kind of slurred with a bit of air, but they do sound similar in conversation)
Writing. In conversational writing, I use a lot of non-standard contractions because they're written versions of how people actually say things. Every one of them, despite the fact that you hear people say it a lot, has been commented on at least once.
Actually, one of Graham's textbooks for this quarter has a chapter-long strawman against prescriptivists which goes on about how we all believe you should never use contractions. And I wouldn't, in a term paper. However, the author seems to think that all writing is thought by people like me to be formal writing, and that we all insist on far stricter rules than most of the prescriptivists I know, and know of, really do. He implies that we don't know that language changes and evolves. Frankly, I spent a lot more time ranting about that book than it deserved, and poor Graham didn't care anywhere near as much as I did, though I think he still mostly agreed with me.
_____________________________________________
Gillian
"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"
"You can't erase icing."
"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"