Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: NASA Glenn develops Venus test chamber

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)

    NASA Glenn develops Venus test chamber

    From (The Cleveland Plain Dealer)

    I suspect this has been going on for a while, but it was a good tie-in to the Venus transit.

    If scientists are to understand how and why Earth and Venus diverged, and what other mysteries the planet named for the Roman goddess of love might hold, they'll need to develop more robust landing craft and sensors that can withstand Venus's punishing conditions.

    That work is under way at the Glenn center, which has a long history of designing and testing equipment for extreme environments, from the components of jet engines to the guts of rocket motors.

    This fall, the center will activate a new, one-of-a-kind simulation chamber capable of mimicking Venus's brutal temperatures, squashing pressures and harsh atmospheric stew. Glenn engineers also are making headway on a power system that could keep vital electronics on a Venus lander cool, and on a heat-tolerant seismometer to measure and transmit information about Venusian quakes.
    The test chamber can also be used to test components in other extreme environments.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  2. #2
    That's what I'm talking about.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    I read somewhere that with current technology we could build even rover capable of moving for days. Earth days, of course.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Massachusetts, USA
    I wonder what the conditions are like on top of Maxwell Montes (11 km above the main surface). It's still not human friendly, but I imagine making electromechanical equipment that would operate there would be a lot easier ... unless the Lead (Pb) dew collected there and covers your camera lenses.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  5. #5
    Lakshmi Planum is my personal favorite; it's not as high as Maxwell Montes, but it's pretty flat, and still high enough to be significantly cooler than the lowlands that characterize most of Venus's surface.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Massachusetts, USA

    OK, now looking it up, I see it's about 70 degrees K difference to by on Maxwell. That makes it a little easier, but probably not lots easier.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  7. #7
    About time someone prepares to send another set of landers to Venus.

  8. #8
    Re AntoniseB: Every K counts.

  9. #9
    I think that it would be more interesting to aim a rover/lander at a place that is typically Venus, ie the lowlands, rather than aiming for a place that is very atypical for the planet (some high mountain top) because its environment is easier. After all, if you want to study deep sea life there is little point in descending to 10 meters because the pressure there is easier.

Similar Threads

  1. Optics to project into a chamber
    By chornedsnorkack in forum Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2011-Dec-19, 12:49 PM
  2. Early NASA Vacuum Chamber Test Gone Wrong
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-08, 07:40 PM
  3. SRB chamber pressure?
    By cjl in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2006-Apr-12, 08:31 AM
  4. Nasa Scramjet test
    By zebo-the-fat in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2004-Nov-16, 03:01 AM
  5. Supposed NASA test
    By Quasi in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 2003-Mar-05, 05:42 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The forum is sponsored in-part by: