A "flying wing"-type airplane and two more traditionally-shaped fighter planes?
F-15 top left, B-2 center, and a wild guess on the last... a F-117. Color seems wrong for that one though.
Solfe
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'That was tops! Who's not good at math? I was all, "Four!"' - Finn, Adventure Time.
I would have said F-18 for the top-left. F-117 was a good call for the last one.
For the one in the second post, I'm going with a German WWII-era plane. I'm still searching for the actual name
Vought V-173.
Solfe
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'That was tops! Who's not good at math? I was all, "Four!"' - Finn, Adventure Time.
Member
Yeah - that's the one. I was thinking about a Luftwaffe Flying wing design, and confused the two.
I'm still leaning towards a two-engined plane for the upper-left one in the first picture. Based on the nose-cone, it might even be an F-14. I'm hesitant though, because of the smallish size of the plane in comparison to the Spirit and Nighthawk. Of course it could be farther away than it appears. Next thought was a MiG-29/Su-27-type craft, but I doubt that one of those would be allowed that near to a B-2
Also - from the start, I've been thinking that the two bright spots at the rear of the plane are the engines - but that could be the flawed assumption here. If instead they were elevators, then maybe F-22, or even an F-35.
The F-35 would make sense, in that there would then be three generations of stealth-aircraft all in the same shot.
Is it currently flying? Looks like a picture taken from the bottom of a lake/sea. Maybe a radar dish that ripped off a plane.
ZRS-5 USS Macon?
Solfe
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'That was tops! Who's not good at math? I was all, "Four!"' - Finn, Adventure Time.
Below is an animated gif I made of a ufo me and my two sisters (11 and 13) saw when I was 5 years old. The 13 year old said LOOK... and we looked where she was pointing and the 11 year old sister screamed and then we all three screamed and ran for the house.
![]()
Indeed, google turned up the "Lenticular Reentry Vehicle" which looked like a USAF flying saucer. Apparently, a bomber. It also appears that one of them does not fly so well through water and seabed.
Not a very well kept secret of a 'plane'. http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/159653.html
Set phasers to multi shot burst! pew! pew! pew!
edit: If I got that right, the disk is roughly forty feet in diameter! Considering the lighting in the image, that was one serious spotlight on the submersible. And before anyone asks, no, the tail is not bent like in the photo. That's just some bad 'scanning' or scanlines. The tail should be straight and the disk more perfect.
I feel like learning how to dive, and scratching some weird symbols followed by "wuz here" on the disk.
I wish I knew all those years ago that simply joining this board and proclaiming myself to be rational would magically transform my uninformed opinions into science; it would have saved me a lot of time and effort.
They are in the best UFO tradition of very bad photos. Why should we care what they are other than bad photos? Everybody and their brother carries around a good phone camera now. Show me the pictures!
Regards, John M.
I'm not a hardnosed mainstreamer; I just like the observations, theories, predictions, and results to match.
"Mainstream isn’t a faith system. It is a verified body of work that must be taken into account if you wish to add to that body of work, or if you want to change the conclusions of that body of work." - korjik
That is the picture. This thread is about identifying objects. That seems to imply that the poster knows what the objects are. We care because it's a game! It's got nothing to do with aliens.
Have you clicked on the link I posted? http://www.strangecosmos.com/content/item/159653.html
It's eerily similar to the photo posted in the thread.
Next ufo please!
Without having read replies:
A bird (flying close past camera), and a patch of snow or light-colored soil.
You got it! It's the (non existing) USAF LRV! Lenticular Reentry Vehicle. (wiki).
So, even fake UFO's do get identified!
----
Hi John, I Posted this thread in fun and games. That is exactly what I wanted this tread to be: fun and games.
As for the "UFO" Image Posted: Here is how I "faked" the "original" image.
Here is the Original:
I then took a slowscan image using my cellphone:
After that I got another photo of that Image in Sepia:
There it is.
And ShinAce got it Right!.
-- Dennis.
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander
Considering that you included the answer in the attachment, yes.
![]()
Your theory is crazy, but it's not crazy enough to be true. - Niels Bohr
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit
Hint: this is at heart a scientific forum, and underneath the fooling around there are some diamond-hard minds hanging about, ready to tear you to shreads. -- Mike Alexander
That would have been a good one, we need to punish the file uploading software.
Solfe
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
'That was tops! Who's not good at math? I was all, "Four!"' - Finn, Adventure Time.