I don't think it's polite to make us search the list of threads for the one's you started.
On the topic of CGI. I would like to know how many are faked videos compared to how many are actually just misinterpreted or misrepresented. From what I have seen, the former is such a small percentage that I don't think that the CGI ones really matter.
At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)
All moderation in purple - The rules
Just for comparison - can you show us a video that you know to be fake, and one you 'know' to be 'real'
And then in each case- explain how you know that one is fake and one is real.
Ok... here is the Apollo 16 video of the saucer shaped craft over the... well... whatever it is... most likely the moon. It is the first picture in this and is well-documented
The reason why we can trust the Apollo missions, at least in practice, is because it is hard to question the integrity.
A man filming a computer screen, by hand, out of focus - and you're saying you 'trust' it.
Where's the actual source footage?
What time was it taken, exactly?
Which crew member was filming it?
Come on - at least provide source material, not some idiotic remix shakey cam nonsense.
All the STS videos are 'real' you say. Real what, exactly?
When you say 2% real what are you refering to? Are you saying that 98% are CGI?
Because, there are a huge amount of UFO related videos with STS and Apollo that do not seem to be CGI to me.
I see one, where it could be the Earth. Besides, How can that be the moon? It's hovering over the moon. That indicates that there wasn't a lot of thought behind that statement.
I see one where the perspective of the limb of the moon could have caused an optical illusion to make it look vertical.
The other one I saw was so quick and without any kind of scale so I can't make anything out. Plus they say that "NASA says" but they don't quote the context or give a reference. To me, that's just a meaningless shot.
Assertions? Claims? No. They are my opinions as to what they look like to me. And; as they look like normal things, then I don't see any need to expand further than those assumptions.
What are you guys... ... ... ... even arguing about... are you arguing against, the STS-videos... ? If so... count me out of this. That is just as lame as saying astronauts never went to the moon.
''hen you say 2% real what are you refering to? Are you saying that 98% are CGI?''
how many videos of STS is there... I think there is about over 60... how many crap CGI vids are there on youtube... hundreds... apart from the very few which are real.
And there really should be hundreds... and no, I am not gonna post them lol
''an unidentified flying object''
''I am not playing these games''
Explain to me what games you want to play, if not the rational ones... if not these, get out my thread please.
I have closed this thread out of courtesy to the newly banned member who started it. If someone has something new and different to add to it, please ask a moderator to reopen it.
Forming opinions as we speak