Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: A really BAD Astronomy article from...

  1. #1

    A really BAD Astronomy article from...

    This article, which reports some interesting science to come from the Arecibo Radio Observatory (to map the MW Galaxy), does a pretty lousy job in its explanation. First, it confuses universe with galaxy, in this case the Milky Way Galaxy.

    Then it says:

    The radio telescope, the world's most sensitive listening device that is powerful enough to hear planets forming several billion lights years away.....The 1,000-foot-wide parabolic receiver -- composed of 38,000 aluminum tiles -- allows researchers to listen to sounds in space instead of depending on optics, like the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope.
    aargghh! :x

    Besides the issue concerning "listening" to radio waves :roll: , I don't believe the first statement is factually correct. Planets? billions of light years away?

    Obviously, there are jobs for good science writers out there, if this kind of thing is allowed to pass muster. Actually, I am a bit suprised. Space.com usually does a decent job.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,516
    The article is from the Associated Press, and not a space.com staff writer. That would explain it. I am not sure space.com would be allowed to edit it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    813
    Even if they can't edit seems they should not post it if it is inaccurate. Either write something themselves or shop for a different article would be the more sensible thing for a credible site to do.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    11,516
    I sent one of my friends at space.com a note. Maybe he'll drop by here.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    3,039
    Yeah that's just bad.

  6. #6
    Planets billions of light-years away...*sigh*...

    Can we even resolve details smaller than galaxy clusters at billions of light-years distance? Cripes, planets, they say!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    2,501
    Quote Originally Posted by RoboSpy
    Planets billions of light-years away...*sigh*...

    Can we even resolve details smaller than galaxy clusters at billions of light-years distance? Cripes, planets, they say!
    Well... you have to be using the topsecret stuff that the CIA has... :wink:

  8. #8
    I heard that same quote this morning on one of the news channels. I screamed, and woke up my whole family. oops.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,992
    Wow... that is pretty bad.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,324

    Re: A really BAD Astronomy article from...

    The radio telescope, the world's most sensitive listening device that is powerful enough to hear planets forming several billion lights years away.....The 1,000-foot-wide parabolic receiver -- composed of 38,000 aluminum tiles -- allows researchers to listen to sounds in space instead of depending on optics, like the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope.
    In space, no one can hear you form planets.
    (or something like that) :roll:
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-01, 01:30 AM
  2. Nits for Davy Levy's Astronomy article
    By George in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2009-Aug-31, 01:21 PM
  3. Babylon 5 article makes Wikipedia Feature article
    By harlequin in forum Small Media at Large
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2006-Apr-01, 11:19 PM
  4. Apollo 13 Article in Feb. 2003 Astronomy Magazine
    By jrkeller in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2003-Mar-31, 06:59 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •