Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Isaac Asimov on how to save the planet

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,536

    Isaac Asimov on how to save the planet

    Part 1

    Part 2


    How sad that we seem to have gone in reverse in the 20 years since his predictions...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,715
    Which predictions?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,536
    That we would all come together as a global nation in the name of space exploration

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    19,834
    Quote Originally Posted by parallaxicality View Post
    That we would all come together as a global nation in the name of space exploration
    I'm not sure I follow.
    I watched both parts and he was talking about humanity and global cooperation on Earth.

    What did he say specifically about space exploration? What exactly did he predict?

    This video was 1989. Before that, the only international cooperation in space was a quick handshake for apollo-soyuz.
    Since that, we've had mir-shuttle, multinational input to shuttle technology, ISS, and multinational planetary probes.
    How did we go backwards?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,173
    Aye, I'm going to have to agree there.
    Oh, I would love it to go further, but American astronauts been routinely sent to a space station built through international cooperation aboard Russian spacecraft?
    That's pretty awesome if you think about it.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,014
    I think the future always comes slower than we expect in the ways we expect, and faster than we expect in the ways we don't expect. Right?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,173
    That seems an apt, if perhaps a tad over pat, way of putting it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,715
    Quote Originally Posted by ravens_cry View Post
    That seems an apt, if perhaps a tad over pat, way of putting it.
    I was impressed with the number of three-letter words you worked into that comment. How about "That was an apt, but a tad over pat, way to put it."

    It was not much more than twenty years ago that the Berlin wall fell, and then the Soviet Union dissolved. Thirty years ago, I heard comments that I might ride into space--now that's where we've fallen down! Let's push to get grapes into space.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,536
    Quote Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
    I'm not sure I follow.
    I watched both parts and he was talking about humanity and global cooperation on Earth.

    What did he say specifically about space exploration? What exactly did he predict?

    This video was 1989. Before that, the only international cooperation in space was a quick handshake for apollo-soyuz.
    Since that, we've had mir-shuttle, multinational input to shuttle technology, ISS, and multinational planetary probes.
    How did we go backwards?
    Well not so much a prediction as a recommendation. He suggested that the only way we could combat global warming is if the UN were replaced by a single global government, similar to the way in which the Articles of Confederation were replaced by the Constitution. Just as the country unified with the expansion to the West after the Civil War, so he suggested the world could unify over space exploration.

    The point that I was making was: a) not only is belief in global warming lower than it was in 1989, but b) we're farther than we were back then from the possibility of a world nation.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    17,308
    Quote Originally Posted by parallaxicality View Post
    The point that I was making was: a) not only is belief in global warming lower than it was in 1989, but b) we're farther than we were back then from the possibility of a world nation.
    I doubt both of those (maybe I'm wrong, but as I remember it, global warming wasn't generally considered to be as solidly established in 1989). We do have more debate now, but that's because we are now debating expensive plans and projects to affect CO2 level. When it gets to spending money, it just generally is going to be a tougher, more heated debate

    Also, I can't imagine there would have been any serious work on a single world nation in 1989
    , but I'll note that I think a world nation at that or this time would be a spectacularly bad idea. Maybe in a few centuries it might be worth considering.

    "The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is hard to verify their authenticity." Abraham Lincoln

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    4,536
    Oh no, i don't think there was any project, or even movement, toward a world nation back then; however I do feel that in the last 20 years we have become, if anything, more insular and xenophobic.

    And just to clarify, I don't think a world state would be a good idea either, unless we became a world nation first. Nations form from the bottom up, states from the top down.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    19,834
    Quote Originally Posted by parallaxicality View Post
    He suggested that the only way we could combat global warming is if the UN were replaced by a single global government...
    I'm not disputing that part of it because that's the message I recieved from it.

    Quote Originally Posted by parallaxicality View Post
    ... so he suggested the world could unify over space exploration.
    That's the part I was talking about since you explicitely stated space exploration. We have been. Maybe not totally, but we are getting pretty good at it. Not many countries have a lot of a space program to make it that visible.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,173
    Quote Originally Posted by grapes View Post
    I was impressed with the number of three-letter words you worked into that comment. How about "That was an apt, but a tad over pat, way to put it."
    Heh, I noticed that once I wrote it but decided to leave it as is.
    On-topic, if we spent even five percent of what we spend on ending lives, wow, just imagine where we could be.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    4,813
    Quote Originally Posted by parallaxicality View Post
    {Snip!} Nations form from the bottom up, states from the top down.
    I'd never given this much thought before but you are quite right. This is very important in understanding history. The history of Europe is about (among other things, of course) the replacement of states by nations, sometimes gradually (Holy Roman Empire --> Germany), sometimes violently (Austria-Hungary --> Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia + pieces distributed to Poland, Romania, Yugoslavia, Italy).

Similar Threads

  1. BioChar to save the Planet?
    By peteshimmon in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2009-Jun-28, 10:20 AM
  2. 101 Ways To Help Save The Planet
    By justlukeyou in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2007-Jun-08, 01:20 PM
  3. Grey's Asimov article about the planet Vulcan
    By A Thousand Pardons in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 2005-Aug-23, 06:58 PM
  4. PLANET EGGS, save yourself...
    By The Watcher in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 2004-Mar-31, 09:40 PM
  5. Isaac Asimov and the lunar conspiracys
    By R.A.F. in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2002-Jul-06, 02:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
here
The forum is sponsored in-part by: