Since
this thread on the Canadian penny went horribly off course with minutia of the US and it's dollar I figured it's best to start a new thread. In addition I want to start off fresh with stating my view up front, and hopefully clear, of my opinion of the subject. I am surprised there's been no infraction given* or complaints by Banquo for a thread hijack.
*(thank you because I think I was a willfull participant)
The short statement:
Considering the US government keeps messing up the conversion by "hoping" a dollar coin catches on, I think the situation would change if they had the discipline to use the same methods that the Canadians used in their conversion.
First, some facts and data that play into the discussion (from wiki and usmint.gov and moneyfactory.gov)
The Sacagawea dollar: 8.1g, 26.5mm x 2mm
The US quarter: 5.67g, 24.26mm x 1.75
The Canadian Dollar (loonie): 7g, 26.5mm x 1.95mm (eleven sided)
The US Dollar Bill Average lifetime is 42 months and makes up 42% of US currency produced
233 US dollar bills stacks 1 inch high. Or a standard 100 stack is 156x66.3x11 mm and is 100g
Average US coin lifetime is 25 years.
Why I support it?
Opinion: I usually spend small amounts in bill and coin, and large amounts in bills. With inflation over my lifetime, what used to be coin only purchases are now bill/coin purchases.
Also, I run into enough situations at a vending machine where I can't get those lousy warn out crumpled or torn and taped dollar bills into the machine.
I also like the design of the Canadian dollar better than the US dollar coin because of it's 11 sides, but I am comfortable with the Sacagawea dollar because it seems like a large improvement over the SBA dollar which was too quarter-like.
The color change helps, and the edging does feel quite different to me.
The change worked for the Canadians and I see no major reason that it couldn't work here.
Fact: it's cheaper for the government
The basic difference in printing costs is:
Bill: $0.1, coin: $0.21.
So; while the coin is more than twice as expensive, it is cheaper over the lifetime.
0.21x42/0.1x300... about a 60% savings.
Now, to reopen the discussion...