Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Question about antiparticles and gravity

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2002

    Question about antiparticles and gravity

    Recently I was reading the book Thirty Years that Shook Physics by George Gamow. In it was a discussion of the open question (as of 1966 when the book was written) of whether anti-particles have anti-gravity. There is also the discussion of how at the time there was no experimental way of testing this because the accuracy required for the experiment far exceeded anything conceivable. I'm curious about whether this question has ever been experimentally tested. The notion of anti-gravity sounds vaguely familiar to the notions of dark energy, so I'm wondering if it is really the same thing.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2003
    We've discussed this before several times (here, here, and here, for example). The direct experiment (making some anti-hydrogen so that you've got electrically neutral anti-matter, but still keeping it contained and then watching to see how quickly it falls) hasn't been done yet, although I think at this point the AEGIS group at CERN are only a couple years away from being able to do it. However, there are some pretty sound theoretical arguments, based on some fairly straightforward observations and measurements, that antimatter should respond the same as normal matter in a gravitational field.
    Conserve energy. Commute with the Hamiltonian.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    I was told by someone at CERN that the experiment to measure
    the fall or possible rise of neutral antihydrogen atoms in Earth's
    gravity will probably be done no earlier than 2015. Before that,
    the easier experiment of obtaining spectra will be done.

    I've been coddling the idea that antimatter might have antigravity
    relative to ordinary matter since the mid-1970's. So far, the only
    objections to it which have not fallen under further study were
    raised here on BAUT. The Pound-Rebka experiment seems to
    conflict with the possibility, as does the apparent observation of
    antineutrinos from Supernova 1987A. Pound-Rebka is a rather
    indirect measurement, so I think its interpretation regarding this
    specific implication may be open to question. The antineutrino
    observation is of two dozen neutrinos or fewer, out of the vast
    number of neutrinos passing through the detectors at that time,
    and it isn't yet clear how "flavor" changes affect which neutrinos
    become detectible at what times and under what conditions.

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

Similar Threads

  1. Another Gravity Question. Surface Gravity This Time.
    By BigDon in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2010-May-07, 01:21 AM
  2. Follow on Question for Max B's Another Gravity Question
    By BigDon in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 2008-Aug-14, 01:32 AM
  3. Gravity question
    By Mild mannered in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2007-Jul-26, 01:14 PM
  4. Gravity question
    By Fazor in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 2007-May-27, 07:01 AM
  5. A question about Gravity.
    By upriver in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2007-Jan-17, 08:19 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The forum is sponsored in-part by: