Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: New edition? Death from the Skies

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    74

    New edition? Death from the Skies

    I would love it if Phil was to create a new edition.
    Being an optimist... I would love the new edition to cover how we might survive some of the disasters, in particular supernova and GRB's.
    Could people on the opposite side of the world survive a supernova or GRB in very long term underground habitats?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    27,571
    No.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
    No.
    no to a new edition or No to surviving.

    If no to surviving then why.
    Yep I get the ozone being destroyed . I get the food chain being destroyed for a long time.
    But you can grow food inside under lights. Even if the O2 level dived (it probably would) you can split water to make oxygen.
    If can'nt be worst than a colony on the moon or on mars.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Olympia, WA
    Posts
    27,571
    No to surviving. Your suggested solutions require too much advance warning, and we simply wouldn't get it.
    _____________________________________________
    Gillian

    "Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"

    "You can't erase icing."

    "I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    74
    Quote Originally Posted by Gillianren View Post
    No to surviving. Your suggested solutions require too much advance warning, and we simply wouldn't get it.
    The book indicate that the survivors (on the opposite side of the world) might have a few months.
    In any case we could build a small number of shelters in advance (right now) containing frozen eggs and sperm as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault

    A mass extinction of humans may have already occurred.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory.

    So you need to maintain dna from say 20000 people in a mostly self sufficient bunker containing say 100-1000 women for x years.
    The book doesn't indicate how many years the earth would need to be habitable again.
    Since the GRB kills ever one including those in deep bunkers on one side of the world you would need more than two of them (three?)
    I said "mostly self sufficient bunker" since they could make trips to the other dead side of the world to raid tinned food from supermarkets.

    Would it take ten years for the earth to be habitable again? 100, 1000? The book doesn't cover that.

Similar Threads

  1. Death from the Skies: Kindle Edition
    By Extravoice in forum Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2010-Jan-14, 06:53 AM
  2. Death From The Skies! ...in my hands...
    By Tom in forum Phil Plait's Bad Astronomy
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2008-Oct-25, 06:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
here
The forum is sponsored in-part by: