I finally know why this thread was started. It's just meant as slander to any thread that comes up in the "similar threads" box.
I finally know why this thread was started. It's just meant as slander to any thread that comes up in the "similar threads" box.
What is the exact difference between "vague term 1" and "vague term 2"?
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
Given that humans are unable to "something humans are quite capable of", how did ancient man survive?
And the alternatives:
Given that humans are then only ones who "something lots of other animals also do", how did that evolve from nothing?
and
Given that "ancient critter X" ONLY "something X didn't only", how did it survive?
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
Gotta watch that Paul, he likes to stir
things up occasionally. And he's good at it!
Wobblywobblywobbly40 is now Wobblywobblywobbly39.
mike alexander is now Helen Shapiro.
Joy Division is now New Order.
Life on Mars is now Ashes to Ashes.
David Tennant is now Matt Smith.
Helen Shapiro has changed back to mike alexander. That didn't last long.
My Dinner is now Eaten.
(The thread that records name changes only annoys me in as much as I can't make comments. Which is probably just as well.)
I want you to review my theory about why Einstein was wrong, even though I don't actually know any of the math involved, or, for that matter, what any of Einstein's theories actually state, and I don't actually want you to tell me why my theory is incorrect. I have also invented an entire lexicon of words that come from science, but don't mean what scientists mean when they use them, so that we can't base our conversation on the same language. kthx.
Short, cryptic and slight smug comment implying you are all making a simple mistake that only I can see.
Who would win this battle: The Care Bears, using Babylon 5 technology, but with Star Wars physics, or the vampires from Twilight, using the magic of Harry Potter, but in the universe of I Dream of Jeannie?
Buzz Aldrin himself once said
The NASA budget is less than the amount spent yearly on Oreo cookies.
But all of that would be no problem if we only had a really big launcher / Newspace / a nuclear thisandthat / Oreo cookies / a space elevator / catched an asteroid / terraformed Wyoming / the good old Shuttle days / solids / liquids / ...
It's simply global to the solution in the OP, since on viable moments it's acting according to my theory. I've worked on this ever since a canned local limit to the magnetic departures came out of my handwaving, and as well, it's classical in its properties! Newtonian is key. Your mathematics shows clearly that absorption is always magnetic. Yes it's a ZPF particle! Certainly, my studying while actually in the ZPF field is a collection of rates of localized conserved moments. It shows all systems are that system, aka word salad.
Blabla nonsense blabla. FACT!
Let's talk about trees. I noticed there are trees.
ETA: and thanks to Torsten I now can't see the forest for the trees!
____________
"Dumb all over, a little ugly on the side." -- Frank Zappa
"Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
"This is really very simple, but unfortunately it's very complicated." -- publius
Moderator comments in this color | Get moderator attention using the lower left icon:
Recommended reading: Board Rules * Forum FAQs * Conspiracy Theory Advice * Alternate Theory Advocates Advice
X it the solution to global warming.
Followed by, in any other thread mentioning global warming:
But if only people would X, then global warming would be solved.
With X being a something with no substantial large-scale work done and thus no hard economical numbers nor any numbers relating to the engineering.
Global warming can be substituted with any other large scale problem where economics makes any real solution sub-optimal in the short- and likely mid-term.
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
Something reminded me of how awesome a book/movie/TV series/etc that occurred several decades ago in my youth was! I will now make cryptic comments about how good it was that will be completely unintelligible to anyone born later.
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?
The Leif Ericson Cruiser
Painfully obvious Monty Python reference, followed by a Marx Brothers reference that will show my age to be greater than 50.
Order of Kilopi
_____________________________________________
Gillian
"Now everyone was giving her that kind of look UFOlogists get when they suddenly say, 'Hey, if you shade your eyes you can see it is just a flock of geese after all.'"
"You can't erase icing."
"I can't believe it doesn't work! I found it on the internet, man!"
Comment through a quotation by Mark Twain.
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
__________________________________________________
Reductionist and proud of it.
Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain
Knee jerk reaction comparing the previous poster to anything and everything that invokes Godwin's law.
Because I know very well this post is against board rules, I predict I will be banned for this post because this board is moderated by something again invoking Godwin's law.
After my banning, quote the moderator's post that explains this got me banned, claiming that my banning proves I'm right and you cannot handle the truth, to end with something invoking Godwin's law.
Order of Kilopi
Nicolas is banned! (Oh, sorry, wrong thread)
Galileo was burnt at the stake for saying the world is round.
They laughed when I said I wanted to be a comedian ... well, they are not laughing now! (B. Monkhouse)
Science doesn't know everything. Therefore it is all wrong. Therefore I am right.
They'd laugh at you in the debating hall for that.