2. Nope. Unlike you I don't stop at broken links. Furthermore, I don't take a leaked, anonymous, unofficial, possibly entirely fabricated document--based on an imagined "acceleration" of SLS development that no one asked for--to be the gospel truth.
3. I do not, for one minute, think you believe those numbers. I don't think anyone can, frankly. But just in case you do - so we are all clear what the real numbers are likely to be - http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/new...at-wsj-article
" The charts-- labeled "ESD Integration, Budget Availability Scenarios" -- do not reveal the motivation for their existence or who created them, other than the NASA logo on each of the 26 pages."