Page 10 of 10 FirstFirst ... 8910
Results 271 to 300 of 300

Thread: Italy cruise ship Costa Concordia makes landfall?

  1. #271
    Quote Originally Posted by Jens View Post
    What is a sat diver? A person who goes scuba diving on Saturdays?
    I'd guess it's saturation diver.

    Another place the fire department can't just sent people to help.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  2. #272
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    It's one of the trickiest professions. Breathing mixed gases , helium , and staying in a dedicated habitat for extended
    periods and doing heavy work at depth is a risky artform. I salute your courage.

  3. #273
    One of my ex shipmates worked asa Sat Diver for years on North Sea Oil Rigs.

    Helium is substituted for the Nitrogen in the air as you are pressured down to your working depth.
    Because the helium molecules are so small they get through the seals on divers watches so when they are depressurised the crystals can blow out.
    They buy watches with special Helium relief Valves to let the pressure out.
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  4. #274
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    In the neighborhood of Grover's Mill
    Posts
    2,247
    The Discovery Channel had a program about the Costa Concordia last evening, but I missed the beginning. It was obviously put together pretty quickly, but included interviews with survivors, video taken during the disaster, and an analysis by experts (I didn't catch their credentials).

    From what I could tell it was very harrowing, especially for people who were supposed to board lifeboats on the port side. The ship listed so much that many couldn't be launched, and people actually had to abandon the boats and re-board the ship. Then, they had to cross to the other side of the ship and try to board lifeboats that were cycling back and forth from shore. Finally, many jumped and swam because the ship kept rolling over and the boat deck was going under.

    I think they said the count was around 30 people dead or missing at the time the show was recorded. The experts concluded that it could have been a whole lot worse with over a thousand dead if the ship had not run aground, and done so close to shore.

  5. #275
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,072
    Quote Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
    HMS Sheffield wasn't sunk by the warhead of the Exocet missile, it didn't detonate. It was sunk by fires started by the rocket motor as it made it's way through the ship into the main machinery space, then from the fuel itself. Her fire main was fractured losing pressure, electrical power was lost and diesel fuel in the engine room 'ready use' tanks started to burn. Twenty crewmen were killed by the fires and she sank 5 days later under tow after being abandoned.
    Board of enquiry laid partial blame at the design of the firemain and pump systems and also the type and ammount of firefighting equipment.
    Very interesting, as always. I find your contributions to the various sea-faring threads to be informative, expert and relevant.

  6. #276
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    In the neighborhood of Grover's Mill
    Posts
    2,247
    This will probably hinder the investigation:

    Crucial data that might explain why the cruise ship the Costa Concordia ran aground off the coast of Italy is missing, an Italian newspaper says.

    Documents leaked to the Corriere delle Sera have raised doubts over whether the black box data recorder was working at the time of the disaster in January.
    (emphasis added)

    Link to BBC story.

  7. #277
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    6,140
    Quote Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
    HMS Sheffield wasn't sunk by the warhead of the Exocet missile, it didn't detonate. It was sunk by fires started by the rocket motor as it made it's way through the ship into the main machinery space, then from the fuel itself. Her fire main was fractured losing pressure, electrical power was lost and diesel fuel in the engine room 'ready use' tanks started to burn. Twenty crewmen were killed by the fires and she sank 5 days later under tow after being abandoned.
    Board of enquiry laid partial blame at the design of the firemain and pump systems and also the type and ammount of firefighting equipment.

    A friend -- USN(retired) -- told me that one problem adding HMS Sheffield's troubles was that the missile hit took out the damage control center.
    Information about American English usage here and here. Floating point issues? Please read this before posting.

  8. #278
    Loss of the fire main, power and the widespread nature of the fires was the main problem. I don't think a small phone switchboard and a few pinboards and plans of the ship would have made any difference. (That's all a 'damage control centre' ammounts to.
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  9. #279
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,577
    I don't see anything about the salvage operation since the bids went out in Feb.
    Apparently, the salvage effort has been pushed back, and they are estimating late spring 2013.
    Pushed back from what? I don' know. The article that I read said basically nothing.

  10. #280
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,182
    The salvage operation has begun in may as far as I know.
    The contract went to Titan Salvage. They are trying to recover it in one piece.
    According to german news the operation is likely to take more than a year to complete.

  11. #281
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    They'll have some fun removing that gigantic boulder which is lodged in the hull. Better get John Henry for that one.

  12. #282
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,182
    They are building cranes to raise it upright.

    http://www.berliner-zeitung.de/image...F605FC.jpg.jpg

  13. #283
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by danscope View Post
    They'll have some fun removing that gigantic boulder which is lodged in the hull. Better get John Henry for that one.
    Thats the first thing they plan to do. To cut it into pieces and then remove it.
    Then they plan to cut away the chimney and the water slides.

  14. #284
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,990
    Quote Originally Posted by Laguna View Post
    They are building cranes to raise it upright.
    Heh, I soooo misread that to mean they were looking to stand her on end (!) for some reason.

  15. #285
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    I found this, with pictures with some added material to show the salvage plan as of May:

    http://gcaptain.com/costa-concordia-...plan-revealed/

    Apparently more detail and updates were just presented a few days ago. This article mentions that, but doesn't get into any of the details:

    http://www.crowley.com/News-and-Medi...orio-Yesterday

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  16. #286
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    Thanks for the link, Van . Very interesting.

  17. #287
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    You're welcome. Glad you liked it.

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  18. #288
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    496
    Couldn't they just do this? Or is the ship too large?

    Oops! I see that it is. The USS Cole at 505 ft came in at around 8,000 tons, while the Costa Condordia at 952 ft is more than 14 times as heavy.

  19. #289
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,577
    Quote Originally Posted by DoggerDan View Post
    Couldn't they just do this?
    Even if the ship weren't too large, they would have to float it first.

  20. #290
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    location
    Posts
    10,118
    Quote Originally Posted by NEOWatcher View Post
    Even if the ship weren't too large, they would have to float it first.
    Where are the Mythbusters and ping-pong balls when you need them?
    Et tu BAUT? Quantum mutatus ab illo.

  21. #291
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.E.Ohio
    Posts
    16,577
    Quote Originally Posted by Ara Pacis View Post
    Where are the Mythbusters and ping-pong balls when you need them?
    Can the ping-pong ball manufacturing infrastructure even handle a project like that in a timely manner.

    I don't even know if that's the answer. I'm sure filling it with ping pong balls would keep it afloat, but don't we still have to get it off the rocks first?

  22. #292
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    It would be more practical to install and inflate individual air bags in many compartments to gradually equalize pressure on the ground and float the weight enough so that parbuckling will pull the ship upright. All this after the side hull damage is "fixed" (holding water).
    Then, de-watering is a progressive process. These sort of things take a good deal of time. The hull damage will be "repaired" once she has been into floating drydock and re-built to specification. That is an entirely different matter. Everything runs into money.

  23. #293
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,990
    Quote Originally Posted by danscope View Post
    It would be more practical to install and inflate individual air bags in many compartments
    Scuba divers consider entering a wreck to be an exceptionally dangerous thing. Too many things can go wrong.

  24. #294
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    I agree, it is quite hazardous, which is why they get the big money. Like I said, that side has to be solid before they can de water such a collossus, and they certainly don't want the hull slipping off the ledge into very deep water. They will need and welcome any positive floatation they can obtain. It will be interesting watching their progress. That's what they call
    " A major job" . This isn't for amateurs.

  25. #295
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    The Great NorthWet
    Posts
    5,105
    Quote Originally Posted by Moose View Post
    Scuba divers consider entering a wreck to be an exceptionally dangerous thing. Too many things can go wrong.
    They've been entering it for some time, of course, first looking for victims and later as part of the de-fueling process.
    Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscript catapultas habebunt.

  26. #296
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    13,990
    Have they? Well, they know what they're doing.

  27. #297
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    They spent weeks finding trapped bodies inside. No easy job there.

  28. #298
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    496
    Quote Originally Posted by danscope View Post
    They spent weeks finding trapped bodies inside. No easy job there.
    I've had the unfortunate duty of doing this. It's not fun. It's very somber. My heart prays for their souls.

  29. #299
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,182
    Quote Originally Posted by danscope View Post
    The hull damage will be "repaired" once she has been into floating drydock and re-built to specification. That is an entirely different matter. Everything runs into money.
    AFAIK the Costa Concordia is considered a total loss. It will not be re-built.
    According to italian media, they are going to make it afloat, then tow it to Parlermo or Livorno to scrap it.

  30. #300
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    R.I. USA
    Posts
    7,169
    Hi, That doesn't surprise me. You'd have to strip it down to a bare hull and replace all of what you pull. Just re-wiring it is a nightmare. It's all a mess. It spells scrap, I think.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2012-Jan-20, 02:40 AM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2012-Jan-19, 01:50 AM
  3. World's largest cruise ship - Is it a barge?
    By mugaliens in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 2009-Nov-09, 12:05 AM
  4. Freedom of the Seas: Largest Cruise Ship Ever
    By sarongsong in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: 2006-Jul-26, 12:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •