I have been working for three months now on an article that describes the Super Relativity explanation of why neutrinos have been found to be moving faster than the speed of light. This recent discovery fits perfectly into the mechanical model described by Super Relativity Theory. In fact the theory predicts that precisely, this type of particle should move faster than light. The paper itself is a bit long so I have decided not to post it here but I will provide a link to it at the bottom of this post. In this comment I will quickly summarize the main concepts and then post a link to the article which has all the details. The article on my website is approximately 27 type written pages long.
To summarize the article, it reintroduces the concept of the aether and makes considerable arguments with quotes from Einstein, John Bell, and Maxwell to name a few. The arguments are laid out for why the aether must exist. Following these arguments I will present the mechanical model that explains the following mysteries.
1. Using all the explanations below. I then explain in detail how and why the neutrino moves faster than light.
2. The perpetual motion of all particles. A physical explanation is provided for why particles move.
3. The origin of gravity is explained. A mechanical model is described that clearly demonstrates why some particles generate a gravitational field while other particles generate little to no mass. This explanation fits in with Einstein’s field equations. General Relativity mathematically defines the field with a formula that accurately describes the geometric structure of the gravitational field in a 4 dimensional space-time. My model provides the explanation for the origin of the gravitational field that emerges from particles.
4. The explanation for inertia is also revealed.
5. A set of simple principles are provided that explain all the above physical phenomena.
6. This article clarifies the meaning of force and action at a distance. All of this is explained with the use of classical mechanics. All that should be needed to form an acceptable Theory of Everything that can be used by modern day science is the development of a set mathematical equations constructed by using the Super Relativity Model as a guide. Since the model is based on aether material that is a continuous interface, differential equations should be used to describe this type of material object.
The Super Relativity Model is a metaphysical, theoretical explanation that is based on intuitive, commonsense philosophy. This leads directly to a mechanical model.
The article that I have composed basically says that a paradigm shift occurred starting in the year 1905. It was initiated ironically enough by Einstein himself who believed that the mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics are purely abstract and therefore QM is an incomplete theory. He did not like the indeterminacy inherent in Quantum Mechanics. The paradigm shift happened in two phases. Scientists of that time moved away from the classical physics paradigm using the method of differential calculus which describes objects that are continuous and how they change in time. Scientists eventually moved toward a statistical method that describes objects as discrete objects in a space that is an empty void. The first phase occurred in 1905 with two papers by Einstein, the paper describing the photoelectric effect which Einstein eventually won the Nobel Prize for and the theory of Special Relativity. The first paper introduced the statistical method that became the basis for Quantum Mechanics. The second paper along with the Michelson Morley Experiment helped to convince scientists to mistakenly think that the aether did not exist. The second phase of the paradigm shift occurred in the years of January 1925 through January 1928: when physicists led by Niels Bohr along with Max Planck, Wolfgang Pauli, Werner Heisenberg and Erwin Schrodinger dealt the death blow to classical physics. There were many advancements put forth in this time period that helped prove the value of quantum mechanics for analyzing particles as discrete objects and this system very successfully described particle interactions for years to come. The massive success of Quantum Mechanics in the next few decades succeeded in entrancing the entire physics community and luring them down a path that I believe is contrary to the fundamental truth of our physical reality. This method for the analysis of physical objects has led us to a dead end in physics. The Quantum Mechanical method which has provided so many correct predictions and ways to seemingly explain particle interactions is in reality only an approximation of physical reality based solely on statistical probabilities. This method of statistical analysis provides no fundamental explanation for how the Universe works. Quantum theory cannot explain why a particle moves or why the speed of light is the value that it is. Its prediction for the graviton has failed to materialize and it appears that its alternate explanation for gravity the Higgs Boson may either not exist or if it does exist the mechanism of how it confers mass to other particles is most likely incorrect. There are other effects in nature that it cannot explain as well, such as inertia. In the world of Quantum Mechanics existence and occurrences happen as a matter of chance, randomly with no explanation other than a cloud of probability.
I believe that we have found a way to use mathematics to predict the correct results to a very high degree of approximation without providing an explanation or understanding of the actual mechanism that lies behind particle interactions. Basically what I am saying is that Quantum Mechanics allows us to predict the outcome without knowing any of the details of how things physically work. We have been doing this for the last 80 years or so. The best minds in physics have been searching for the Unified Field Theory using a mathematical method that cannot possibly reveal the correct fundamental explanation for our physical reality. The correct mathematical formulation must be done by using differential equations. If we don’t correct our course it will be decades perhaps centuries before some else arrives at this basic truth. The theory of Super Relativity holds great hope for humanity as it predicts that the light speed barrier can be exceeded. The recent discovery that the neutrinos may be traveling faster than light proves that Super Relativity’s prediction is correct. Therefore I feel that we must resume the course Einstein was taking in his final years. All these years physicists were so sure that the speed of light could not be exceeded. This should be a wakeup call for all of us. Many times in history scientists that have supported and maintained the status quo have been wrong and so there is a good chance that we may be mistaken again. I ask that you please give my ideas fair consideration. The ideas presented in my article are important and of great value as I have provided for you a mechanical model which a clever physicist or mathematician should be able to turn into a provable mathematical formulation that will successfully reveal the Theory of Everything. The Theory of Super Relativity exposes for all to see a way to build a technology known as the Slip Wave. The Slip Wave Spatial Bias Drive will provide us with an engine that can propel a ship at many times the speed of light.
I leave you with these final thoughts.
Quotes from article in the NewScientist.com
Here are some comments from David Gross who is a Nobel Laureate and a heavyweight in physics. He earned the Nobel Prize for work on the strong nuclear force. He indicated in the article by Michael Strauss that what is happening today is very similar to what happened at the 1911 Solvay meeting. Back then, radioactivity had recently been discovered and mass energy conservation was under assault because of its discovery. Quantum theory would be needed to solve these problems. Gross further commented that in 1911 "They were missing something absolutely fundamental," as well as "we are missing perhaps something as profound as they were back then." Coming from a scientist with establishment credentials this is a damning statement about the state of current theoretical models and most notably string theory.
Last December ('05), physicists held the 23rd Solvay Conference in Brussels, Belgium. Amongst the many topics covered in the conference was the subject matter of string theory. This theory combines the apparently irreconcilable domains of quantum physics and relativity. David Gross a Nobel Laureate made some startling statements about the state of physics including: "We don't know what we are talking about" whilst referring to string theory as well as "The state of physics today is like it was when we were mystified by radioactivity."
For details on the Super Relativity mechanical model that explains how neutrinos travel faster than light Please see the article on my website.