Kepler's third law rules the Gravity

[pogono]

OK now that is just rude.
(...)
Note that most people who viewed did not comment. Either because they didn't feel they could or because they were aware that they had spent enough time on the paper to comment.

Right, Shaula.
I apologize and withdraw my last sentences.

I suppose these sentences was caused by material fatigue and some seed of bitterness.
I put a lot of effort into this manuscript and was expecting substantive discussion, maybe even some support.

But never mind.
I am back in the ring, now. Even if it is empty.

[Shaula]

Well, good luck with it. If it was my area I'd have gone through it. Sadly the last time I did anything like that was back at uni. Which was a long time ago. The most I could do in sniff around the edges looking for nit-picks. Which is not useful.

[pogono]

Well, good luck with it.

Thank you Shaula.

I've made some brief explanation of my idea for physicists.

I put fields into one table to make it easier to understand how I explain fields phenomena.




**I do not why - if we have to explain Fine Structure Constant - then energy associated with Charge needs to be considered:

- not for regular
- but for some smaller radius equal to:

[pogono]

For those interested.

Manuscript with above Table and some smooth corrections updated to:

http://www.tp-theory.net

[pogono]

Hello everyone.

Today, my manuscript was accepted by Editorial Board for publication! :-D

Therefore I have erased pdf from my website.
It will be replaced with a link to Journal Article, as soon as the article will be available.

P.S.
Do you know maybe, how many authors presenting their ideas here on ATM Forum, had finally finished with publication?
Does anyone make such statistics?
Just curious, how do I performed as compared to others.

[tusenfem]

I guess congrats are called for then!
What journal did you send it to (maybe you said, and I missed it)?

[Shaula]

Indeed, congratulations. Hopefully this is just the start of the journey too.

I don't know of any previous ATM proposal that has made it into a mainstream journal - but then again I am a relative newcomer.

[Hornblower]

How about MOND, as proposed by Dr. Milgrom and others as an alternative to dark matter for explaining galaxy orbital curves? ATM does not necessarily mean something originally presented here by an underinformed newbie.

[Shaula]

Well, then I guess you could just answer "everything" as at one point or another every theory was ATM. I took it to mean presented here.

[pogono]

Indeed, congratulations. Hopefully this is just the start of the journey too.

Thank you. I was advised to check it with Noether's Theorem, and fit the idea into Symmetry groups (Lie groups / Lie Algebra) to fit it with Quantum Mechanics. So, who knows, maybe I will open another ATM thread, soon ;-)

But at first, I have to finish opening process of my Ph.D. in management/economy. I have the final presentation 14th Jan.
Physics is my hobby (and passion) - I was learning physics and writing manuscript in the "meantime".

I guess congrats are called for then!
What journal did you send it to (maybe you said, and I missed it)?

Thanks. I will let you know, I promise.
But this time I will post in S&T thread ;-) (or at my profile Welcome Message)

How about MOND, as proposed by Dr. Milgrom and others as an alternative to dark matter for explaining galaxy orbital curves? ATM does not necessarily mean something originally presented here by an underinformed newbie.

We have a lot of that. Beside MOND (whit I do not buy, and I am sure Milgrom is wrong) we have f.e. tachyons.

But my question was only about ATM'ers.
Never mind. I was just curious.

Now, I would like to ask mods to close may thread.
Thank you for your attention and see you soon.
I will post some fresh portion of ATM idea but after may final presentation ;-)

[pzkpfw]

Thread closed - due to the "30-day rule".