The scientific community is a subset of the public at large.
Yes, there will be much ill-informed criticism, just as there is no shortage of woo woo ideas here at ATM. If as carefully- and conservatively - moderated as ATM, then I see the exercise as enjoyable and participatory. Shucks, we could do it here: RTM, Review the (current publications?) Mainstream. OP, I support your idea.
Regards, John M.
I'm not a hardnosed mainstreamer; I just like the observations, theories, predictions, and results to match.
"Mainstream isnít a faith system. It is a verified body of work that must be taken into account if you wish to add to that body of work, or if you want to change the conclusions of that body of work." - korjik