Fun Papers In Arxiv

[Tensor]

For 11 July 2012

There were 78 papers Of those there were 51 new, 4 cross posted, leaving 23 replacements. There were quite a few papers on dust. Proto planetary, accretion disk, interstellar, dust emission. There were a couple on the re-analysis of WMAP 7, and a couple on large scale structure. For those who want to check out other papers, they can find them here

Topics: Intermediate Mass Black Holes, Neutrinos and Supernova Nucleosynthesis, Galactic Cluster Formation, Hypothesis Disputes. False Positive Exo-planet discoveries.

Intermediate Mass Black Holes: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2497 Constraining Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Globular Clusters
Stefan Umbreit, Frederic A. Rasio

I knew that IMBH haven’t been found. I didn’t know why they were such a challenge to find. Now I do. Also explained is the most likely place to find them.

Neutrinos and supernova nucleosynthesis: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2527 Neutrino-driven wind simulations and nucleosynthesis of heavy elements
Arcones, F.-K. Thielemann

In core collapse supernovae, neutrinos are originally trapped within the neutron star. They eventually blow off the outer portion of the neutron star (I know, we’re used to thinking of neutrinos don’t interact with anything) and thus spewing out the heavier elements. This paper looks at how they also are responsible for the creation of the lighter heavy elements.

Galactic cluster formation. http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2614 A star-bursting proto-cluster in making associated to a radio galaxy at z=2.53 discovered by H_alpha imaging
Masao Hayashi, Tadayuki Kodama, Ken-ichi Tadaki, Yusei Koyama, Ichi Tanaka

This paper looks at a Galactic Cluster forming around a major radio galaxy at ~z = 2.5. They explain why the data suggests that the galaxies in this newly forming cluster may be a progenitor of massive galaxies in a latter day cluster.

Hypothesis Disputes: http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2749 Comments on the "Monoceros" affair
M Lopez-Corredoira, A. Moitinho, S. Zaggia, Y. Momany, G. Carraro, P. L. Hammersley, A. Cabrera-Lavers, R. A. Vazquez

This was instructional as this paper was a letter disputing several recent papers (links to the recent papers are at the link to the paper). The authors of this paper, were also authors on papers that the recent papers are trying to overturn. I say, look at this, look at the links and make up your own mind.

False Positive Exo-planets. http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2481 Constraining the False Positive Rate for Kepler Planet Candidates with Multi-Color Photometry from the GTC
Knicole D. Colón, Eric B. Ford, Robert C. Morehead

For those interested in exp-planetary science, this paper looks at reducing the number of false positives on exo-planet discoveries using Kepler.

[Jerry]

Fifty seven new entries, including cross listings; but very few that perked my interest.

Supernova Paper of the day:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.2811.pdf
One of the major quests in supernova research is identifying supernova progenitors - this is the best way to determine if what we think is happening is really happening. In this case, it is a type IIP event; and the evidences is quite good that a red giant bit the dust.

Solar Paper:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.2857.pdf Coronal mass ejections (CME) are important because the wreak havoc for our fleet of satellites and threaten global communication and electricity distribution systems. This paper on a major event in January 2010 looks at the magnetic structure that bubbles into a full blown event.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.2907.pdf looks at variability in one of the most closely studied Cepheids ever; revealing a less stable period than generally expected.

[antoniseb]

From 16 July 2012

There are 45 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Sun's Motion, Star-Forming in Pipe Nebula, Low-mass Axions*

*Sun's Motion* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3079 We have a reasonable sense of the Sun's motion in the galaxy, but this paper tightens the uncertainty a fair amount, by using three independent methods of determining the distance to Sgr A* and the Sun's velocity.

*Star Forming in the Pipe Nebula* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3310 The Pipe Nebula is nearby and loaded with starless cores. It has a magnetic field which seems to be inhibiting the formation of stars to some degree. This is an interesting place to watch, and see models of star formation play out with this magnetic constraint.

*Low Mass Axions* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3124 Axions are usually assumed to have a mass of about 10^-5 eV, but this paper looks at the consequence of them having a variable mass that was perhaps 10^-5 eV and higher in the early moments of the universe, but now has a mass of about 10^-24 eV. Of course detecting an individual particle of such a mass is impossible with any technology we can imagine, but the idea is that IF these axions can work as a Bose-Einstein Condensate, that they could collectively behave as cold dark matter. I'm not a big axion fan, but I'm trying to stay up with the idea.

[trinitree88]

Superluminous Supernova and Gamma Ray Bursts SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3630
The bolometric light curve of putative "Superluminous" supernovae can be explained using a simple model that has the ejecta run into previously ejected circumstellar envelopes. interesting. pete

[antoniseb]

From 18 July 2012

There are 66 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Cold Molecular Gas, Reionization, Cosmic Neutrinos, Flaring Blazar, Early Mars Climate, 3 CLusters Merging, Lucky Imaging*

*Cold Molecular Gas* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3793 We're still working out details on the mechanisms that formed galaxies and clusters of galaxies. Among the many issues have to do with how hot ionized gas can cool back to being cold enough to form molecules... and one of the limitations of the theory is the weakness of the observation. This millimeter-wave study looks at an odd tendril of cold gas from the core to about 60 kpc away inside the cluster Abell 1795. (Interesting pictures and graphs).

*Reionization* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3803 The universe cooled off enough 380,000 years after the big bang so that ions turned into atoms. Some time later, the collapse of matter into energy-releasing objects (like stars) sent ionizing radiation out that converted those atoms into ions again. This paper looks at observations from z=10 to z=6 (not many observations at z=10) to try and determine what fraction of ionizing radiation escpaed (to us) from star-forming regions in that era, so as to measure the progress of reionization relatively directly.

*Cosmic Neutrinos* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3846 IceCube has not found isolated sources for high energy neutrinos. ARIANNA is a new project aimed at having 100 times the volume of IceCube. It will be on the Ross Ice Shelf, and it will only be sensitive to extremely high energy neutrinos (>10^17 eV). We get some Cosmic Rays with energies above 10^19 eV, but because of the GZK effect, they can't be from far away (maybe 100 million light years), but in the GZK interaction, they should give off high energy neutrinos, and these see the CMB and IGM as transparent... so we should be able to detect some of them. How many, and from where is still an open question, but this fairly inexpensive experiment can give us our first clues.

*Flaring Blazar* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3979 4C 38.41 is a blazar (quasar with jet aimed at us) at about z=1.8. It recently (2011) had a large outburst, which was observed repeadedly in many wavelengths, and this paper tries to assemble what we can about the physical explanations for what we observed and what it tells us about the source. While nothing conclusive is found, there is a lot of implications about the structure and mechanisms of jets that makes for good reading.

*Early Mars Climate* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3993 When Mars had a thicker atmosphere, what was it like? I wave my hands a lot while answering that one. This paper gives some more reasoned and calculated specifics.

*3 Clusters Merging* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4009 The SZ Effect is helping us find distant clusters of galaxies. This paper is about three clusters that the Planck spacecraft has identified at about z=0.46 which may be merging to form a gigantic cluster... or they are in a filament that we are looking straight through. Either way, this is an interesting set of objects that further research on will constrain some models of how the universe got to be the way it is.

*Lucky Imaging* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4065 "Lucky" in this case means that the adaptive optics have a nearby bright star so that they can better reconstruct the wavefront and get to diffraction-limited performance. This paper is about new tools/techniques being implimented in La Palma (on the 10.4 meter GTC) that reduces the required magnitude for the lucky star to such a dim object that almost the whole sky becomes available for better-than-Hubble imaging in the optical bands.

[IsaacKuo]

I was stuck with the kids all night so I won't be posting my full posting until tonight. However, I did want to quickly post a fun paper I noticed from Monday:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3342 - Tensile Strength and the Mining of Black Holes

This paper discusses physics limits of mining black holes for hawking radiation. MINING BLACK HOLES. How cool is that?

[trinitree88]

Here's an interesting idea by Abraham Loeb....fund some fundamental research the way Bell Labs did. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3812

[trinitree88]

Here's an interesting idea by Abraham Loeb....fund some fundamental research the way Bell Labs did. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3812

and How Well do we need to measure the Higgs boson?...depends... SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3560

[Tensor]

For 19 July 2012

There were 78 papers Of those there were 42 new, 4 cross posted, leaving 32 replacements. For those who want to check out papers not listed here, they can find them here

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4196 High Velocity Dispersion in A Rare Grand Design Spiral Galaxy at Redshift z=2.18
David R. Law, Alice E. Shapley, Charles C. Steidel, Naveen A. Reddy, Charlotte R. Christensen, Dawn K. Erb

This was interesting as we’ve had several posts questioning rare galaxies in different papers. This paper points out that although this full spiral appearing galaxy is the only one known at z > 2, the merger it is undergoing can produce short term spiral structures (as verified by different simulations). The constraining requirements means these will appear rare at high z.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4186 Modeling Dust and Starlight in Galaxies Observed by Spitzer and Herschel: NGC 628 and NGC 6946
Aniano et al

This paper shows that there cannot be large amounts of cold (T < ~12K) dust. Dust was modeled and then the resulting model was compared to the two galactic SED. The model succesfully reproduced the galactic SED.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.4248.pdf On the Formation of Active Regions
Robert F. Stein, Åke Nordlund

Short paper explaining a simulation showing that flux tubes are not necessarily needed to allow magneto-convection to produce an active region on the Sun’s surface.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4310 Testing SNe Ia distance measurement methods with SN 2011fe
J Vinko, et al

Discussion as to why two light fitting codes for SNe1a differ by 2 sigma. Why one (SALT2) matches well with the recently revised Cepheid based distance, and how some systematics may explain the difference. And how both are consistent with the HST Key Project distance.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4466 An evidence for indirect detection of dark matter from galaxy clusters in Fermi-LAT data
Andi Hektor, Martti Raidal, Elmo Tempel

Another paper showing the peak at 130 GeV consistent with an interpretation of the annihilation of dark matter. This represents a 3.2 sigma signal and matches previous claims of discovery of the same peaks found in the galactic center.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 17 July 2012

This week in awesome is a theory that the first endoskeleton vertibrate ancestors had a mutation that caused them to literally grow inside-out. Voila! What was once an exoskeleton is now an endoskeleton!

---

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3624 - How to Grow an Organism Inside-Out: Evolution of an internal skeleton from an external skeleton in bilateral organisms

This paper suggests a theory which sounds kind of crazy, at least to me. They suggest that vertibrate ancestors evolved an endoskeleton from exoskeleton ancestors via a mutation which caused them to literally grow inside-out.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3720 - Astrophysical Applications of Gravitational Microlensing

This meaty paper has a lot of helpful diagrams and explanations of microlensing, and a very nice discussion of the sort of scientific results microlensing has provided and promise to provide.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3545 - Planets in Open Clusters Detectable by Kepler

This extensive paper studies what open cluster planets should be detectable by Kepler, and how an extended Kepler mission benefits the study of open cluster study. It's a lot to digest, but there are a lot of helpful graphs.

[Jerry]

Forty-seven new papers today and a lot of good stuff.

I get to start with a couple of Supernova papers:


http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1207.4781.pdf Does the first Principle Component Analysis (that I am aware of) of the Supernova type Ia Cosmology data set and concludes that while the formal errors are wider than many prior papers admit; the net result is the same: There is more dimming into the past than straight-forward linear expansion (within a relativistic transform) predicts.

This is the best one:

http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1207.4648.pdf This is one of those 'whoooh nellie' moments; a type Ia explosion so bright that the amount of Ni radiating is at the least equal to an entire Chandrasekar mass! The implications? If the most distant events are more like this than your garden variety type Ia, we need a better explanation than acceleration for cosmic dimming.

Tuning up the lower distance ladder:

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1207.4731 Uses Hubble images of the global clusters in M-31 to fine tune the distance to this nearby galaxy.

Gamma Rays - kind of an overview:

http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1207.4620.pdf Concludes that while more distant sources appear to have higher energies, the author cautions that selection effects may play an important role in this determination.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1207.4536 Interesting study, looking for the posssible relics of pop III stars in the Sloan survey. 18 candidates are found, and a technique developed for broader studies using the very large telescope.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1207.4512 I like this paper because it is easy to forget, in this age removed from film emulsions and silver grain size, that our instruments must still be carefully calibrated to avoid non-linear responses that are spectral energy dependent.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1207.4489.pdf Measuring the metalicity gradient of the most distant galaxies is a daunting task because of the weakness of the signal and the lensing distortions of these most distant observable spectral signatures (~z=2). But it doesn't keep us from trying. These researchers figure they have plucked the metallicity gradient of these distant cousins, and shaped an evolutionary scenario...assuming, of course, selection effects are not a big bother.

http://xxx.lanl.gov/pdf/1207.4706.pdf Compares intermediate PLANCK results with earlier CMB studies, such as WMAP; and finds strong agreement in pinpointing sources of cyclotronic emission, but very different result from dusty sources; to which the earlier studies may have been much less sensitive.

Finally:

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/1207.4692 Looks at the types of errors that arise when we assume 'round cow' gravitational lenses and concludes such assumptions lead to 'artificial' conclusions. The degeneracy can be minimized when time delay information is available; but it rarely is.

[publiusr]

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.3342 - Tensile Strength and the Mining of Black Holes

This paper discusses physics limits of mining black holes for hawking radiation. MINING BLACK HOLES. How cool is that?

I wonder if it would help to have two neutron stars orbiting. Each would have a thread with one end suspended towards the magnetar. If gravity is the weaker force, how might an elevator use two orbiting magnetars to open up the black hole for mining radiation?

Seeing this thread got me to thinking about the link above:
http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthre...yson-Slingshot.

Speaking about a three body problem--your post her got me to thinking about asteroid mining:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5755 - ORBITS, MASSES, AND EVOLUTION OF MAIN BELT TRIPLE (87) SYLVIA

This is another paper of interest to science fiction authors and game designers, showing an example of an interesting asteroid setting.

Now it is easy for a third body to become ejected without too much effort. Might this be the asteroid best suited for transport? Here is a possible method of asteroid return--large aerobrakes
http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=15788

The idea of mining black holes with strings made me think of this concept: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superco...energy_storage

I wonder if that might allow a workaround against EMP/solar flares similarly? It might be a simpler form of space based solar power. Maybe these lines can harvest electricity from Gas giants in a true Prometheus project as I suggest here: http://up-ship.com/blog/?p=15308

[antoniseb]

*From 23 July 2012*

There are 42 papers today (Monday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Forming Planets, Mid-IR Detectors, Gasous Halos*

*Forming Planets* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4789 There are a lot of ways that we can investigate the timelines of star-forming and planet forming, and one piece of the puzzle is looking at the stimulated H2 emissions from circumstellar nebulae around new stars. This paper is about a study of this with Hubble. Interesting results.

*Mid-IR Detectors* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4811 Big Telescopes (25-40 meter class) are coming, and new technology is being developed for the middle infrared wavenegth detectors/ spectrometers. This is a fairly terse paper covering the interesting new technologies being developed for this range.

*Gasous Halos* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.4837 One relatively hot topic amongst dark matter doubters is the question of how much gasous (cold and plasma combined) there is in the halo of galaxies. This paper makes careful and reasoned estimates of these.

[trinitree88]

Something I always suspected, but had never seen any peer-reviewed work on rears it's ugly head....parity effects in the universe at large, with galaxy spins not being isotropic. interesting. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5464 pete

[antoniseb]

From 25 July 2012

There are 41 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Astrometric Planet-hunting, Early Nuggets, Faster Than Swift*

*Astrometric Planet-hunting* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5510 PRIMA is an instrument add-on to the VLTI, which will permit 10 microarcsecond postional measurents of some stars (it is hard to do, so it won't rapidly produce a big catelog). They plan to use this for getting more information about planets around dwarf stars, by watching how the stars wiggle around the sky.

*Early Nuggets* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5583 In the very early years of the solar system, there was a period of 20,000 to 80,000 years (a very short period cosmologically speaking) when refractory metal nuggets were formed. This paper is about those nuggets and how they formed.

*Faster Than Swift* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5759 In 2013 a new fast GRB detecting mission will be launched as a pathfinder, for the hoped-for mission this paper describes, which would be able to start taking xray spectra of GRBs within one second of trigger, which should be able to tell us a lot about the environments of roughly 30 GRBs per year.

[StupendousMan]

Papers for Wednesday, July 25: planets, stars, instruments -- a little of everything.

The Fate of a WD Accreting H-Rich Material at High Rates makes a rather strong statement. For many years, astronomers have considered that Type Ia supernovae may form when a white dwarf accretes material from a nearby companion. The authors follow the evolution of the layers of material which build up on the surface of such a white dwarf over a large number of cycles -- accrete, then ignite the surface layer, accrete again, then ignite again, and so forth. They claim that the net effect is NOT to allow more and more material to accumulate, so that the WD reaches the Chandrasekhar limit; instead, they claim that the WD doesn't gain mass at all.

Doppler Signatures of the Atmospheric Circulation on Hot Jupiters shows how with sufficiently detailed spectra of stars as a planet transits may reveal how gas in the planet's atmosphere moves: from day to night, or as a planet-circling jet stream.

A parallax distance and mass estimate for the transitional millisecond pulsar system J1023+0038 describes how radio measurements of this binary system (pulsar plus ordinary star) allow us to estimate its distance, motion, and therefore its mass. They find a mass of 1.71 +/- 0.16 solar masses for the pulsar.

The Unusual Temporal and Spectral Evolution of SN2011ht. II. Peculiar Type IIn or Impostor? So, was this object a core-collapse supernova, or a luminous blue variable? If the former, it would have exploded and left nothing but perhaps a tiny remnant; if the latter, it simply blew off a small layer of material from its outer atmosphere. The authors use spectroscopic data to argue that the latter is more likely.

A next generation Ultra-Fast Flash Observatory (UFFO-100) for IR/optical observations of the rise phase of gamma-ray bursts There have been plenty of ground-based and orbiting searches for gamma-ray bursts, but most of them cannot respond VERY rapidly to a new signal. The UFFO-100 is a planned satellite mission, to launch next year, which is designed to point itself within a few seconds to new GRB. It isn't the biggest or most sensitive instrument, but it does promise to investigate a small number of sources in a new way.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 24 July 2012

CATEGORIES: AGAINST THE FRINGESTREAM, TELESCOPES, STARS AND PLANETS, MISC

This week's awesome paper is a Randi style challenge against pseudoscientific anti-Quantum mechanics claims.

---

AGAINST THE FRINGESTREAM

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5294 - Quantum Randi Challenge

This paper proposes a challenge similar to the famous Randi challenge, for quantum physics. In particular, it targets pseudoscientific claims that the predictions of quantum mechanics can be reproduced with a classical local realistic model.

---

TELESCOPES

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5320 - Tunable High-Frequency Gravitational-Wave Detection with optically-levitated sensors

This paper proposes a novel gravity wave detector, using optically levitated microscopic discs or spheres. They're like tiny drums which could resonate with passing gravity waves completely decoupled from the surroundings due to the levitation.

---

STARS AND PLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5250 - ARCHITECTURE OF PLANETARY SYSTEMS BASED ON KEPLER DATA: NUMBER OF PLANETS AND COPLANARITY

This extensive paper studies the multiplicity and inclination distribution of planetary systems based on the Kepler data so far. Due to inherent limits in that data, they only study the planets with orbital period under 200 days and radius between 1.5 and 30 Earths. Note that none of the planets in our own solar system would fit this criteria. A nice paper for keeping up with the latest in exoplanet science.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5393 - An accurate mass and radius measurement for an ultracool white dwarf

Here's a nice example of using photometric and astrometric data on an eclipsing binary to determine mass and radius. This paper includes a lot of nice graphs.

---

MISC

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5216 - A geometric protocol for cryptography with cards

This paper demonstrates a solution to a generalized Russian cards problem, where three players draw cards from a deck and two attempt to communicate the contents of their hands without revealing this information to the third player. The two allied players can only use clear statements with no pre-prepared secret code. This sort of thing might not have a clear practical use, but it's interesting to think about cases where it's possible to securely communicate without a pre-arranged code and public messages.

[antoniseb]

From 26 July 2012

There are 60 papers today (Thursday), not counting replacements. I'm filling in for Tensor and we had a little mixup where StupendousMan (I thought) was going to cover tonight, but doubled up on last night (finding some great papers!). There were a few papers about Fullerenes (C60), which is an unusual topic.

Topics: *3D Maps of the LMC & SMC, Quasi-stars, WR Binary*

*3D Maps of the LMS and SMC* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5791 We see the Magellanic Clouds as smudges on the night sky, but thanks to some leftover data from OGLE, we have very detailed information about many stars with very well established brightnesses, and these authors have used that to build a fairly good 3D map of these neighboring galaxies.

*Quasi-stars* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.5972 How did the giant black holes form? This PhD dissertation looks at the possibility of a stellar mass black hole in the center of a massive orbiting disk in a galactic center might accomplish this. The details of how matter can keep falling in inspite of the heat and radiation is an interesting story.

*WR Binary* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6032 Wolf-Rayet stars are giant helium burning cores of former even more massive normal stars. CV Serpentis is an eclipsing binary WR star, and detailed observation of the eclipse profile shows that the environment around these stars is changing rapidly enough that it appears quite different in observations only a few years apart. This paper looks at what we have learned about this strange system using the MOST telescope.

[Jerry]

60+ papers, lots of round cows, but nothing earth-shaking.


arXiv:1207.6144 Parametric decay of oblique Alfvén waves in two-dimensional hybrid simulations I pulled this one out because it is unusual. The results of the simulations should not be surprising to anyone weaned on hetrodyne circuits.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.6346v1.pdf High energy Transients - an overview of some of the surprising results of Compton, Beppo-sax, Integral, Swift and Fermi. Fun, if you haven't read one lately. Fairly easy read, but not plowing any new ground, if you have already been there.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.6322.pdf Another weak lensing paper to throw onto the pile. At least they are addressing these from acnon-gaussian prospective - always an iffy assumption.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.6294.pdf Stellar burp? CO detected recently in Magellanic Cloud supergiants, and in places where it could have been detected before, but wasn't.

[antoniseb]

From 30 July 2012

There are 35 papers today (Monday), not counting replacements. More than usual about observing the solar surface.

Topics: *Radio GRBs, PBHs, NEAT, Hyades Brown Dwarfs*

*Radio GRBs* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6399 Going through the Parke's archive data, this team has found what looks like short transient bursts (looking at 1.4 GHz), which, given their dispersion characteristics look like they could be prompt GRB emissions lasting between 64 microseconds and one second. It looks like they are coming in about 4 per year per square degree of the sky. Importantly, IF these aren't just local (human-created) transients, studying these would potentially give us ways to measure the progress of the reionization period, and also relatively directly measure the baryon density of the universe along the paths of the signals.

*Primordial Black Holes* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6405 This is a paper about looking at verious red-shifted 21 cm observations (in the future with the SKA) looking for the effects of primoridal black holes on what is seen. If they exists, this is a way that they might be observed. If they aren't seen, this will strongly constrain the possible masses they might have.

*NEAT* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6511 NEAT is a future mid-sized mission (2015-2025) which would look for Earth-like planets around nearby stars. This paper is a description of the mission.

*Hyades Brown Dwarfs* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6620 The Hyades is a nearby cluster (the face of the bull in Taurus). This paper is about using some new techniques of high contrast imaging to look for low-mass objects in this cluster. Nothing very surprising, but nice to confirm and refine estimates.

[parejkoj]

Since it doesn't have quite as exciting a title as some, I figured I'd note this paper:

*SDSS DR9* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7137 The Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 9 (DR) is now live to the public. This includes the first public release of data from the new Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) spectrograph, which is a significant improvement over the SDSS I/II spectrograph, having both broader wavelength coverage and better throughput. DR9 is available from http://sdss3.org/dr9/. DR9 includes the data from all previous data releases, with spectra of about 1.5 million galaxies, 228 thousand quasars, and 668 thousand stars, in addition to the roughly a billion photometric sources.

If you want to do research in an astrophysics subject, there's probably data you can use in DR9. It's all there, and it's quite well documented, so dig in!

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 31 July 2012

CATEGORIES: WIRELESS POWER, EXOPLANETS, MISC

This week in awesome is a magnetic equivalent of lenses, to concentrate magnetic fields rather than light.

Another awesome paper calculates light curves for using the transit method to detect exomoons and binary planets.

---

WIRELESS POWER

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7030 - Magnetic energy harvesting and concentration at distance by transformation optics

This fascinating paper presents an idea for concentrating magnetic fields in a way similar to how lenses can concentrate light. This could have some very interesting applications for wireless transfer of energy. In particular, I wonder if it might be used to wirelessly spin up a flywheel for cheap compressed air cars. Such cars might use wireless magnetic energy transfer for highway driving, and then use compressed air for "last mile" driving.

---

EXOPLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6966 - The Rossiter-McLaughlin effect for exomoons or binary planets

This awesome paper features calculations and example light curves of using the transit method to detect exomoons, binary planets, or hierarchical triple star systems. This is taking the transit method to the next step, of course. I don't know how close we are to gathering transit data good enough for this, but it feels more doable than a radial method variant.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6637 - PynPoint: An Image Processing Package for Finding Exoplanets

This paper presents a software package to detect directly imaged exoplanets from image data, using simulated images. This paper has a lot of nice pictures explaining things. This paper is a good read for those interested in the direct imaging method.

---

MISC

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6778 - Two player game variant of the Erdos-Szekeres problem

This paper studies an interesting two player game. Players take turns placing points on a plane. The game ends when a convex k-gon is formed; the player who placed the game ending point loses. This is one of those mathematical games which is easy to state but not so obvious how to win.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6780 - The simplest rout to generating a train of attosecond pulses

This paper describes two new ways to produce a train of attosecond laser pulses. I'm not sure what good this is for, but I imagine it might be adapted in ways to produce super slow motion video.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6814 - Adaptive Fractal-like Network Structure for Efficient Search of Inhomogeneously Distributed Targets at Unknown Positions

This paper includes some really nice pictures showing a quadtree-like network structure and studies its performance.

[antoniseb]

*From 01 Aug 2012*

There are 46 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Eye Candy, Megamasers, SDSS 9, Gravitational Waves At Home*

*Eye Candy* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7141 This paper's name tells you why its cool. The 2012 Interferometric Beauty Contest has lots of images showing details of things far away. Some of these images you've seen already, but they are collected in one place here.

*Megamasers* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7273 & http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7292 are a couple of papers about observing relatively distant megamasers giving direct geometric distances to galaxies of 137 and 47 megaparsec (with wide error bars) directly. While these measurements won't by themselves confirm or rule out cosmological models, this technique with larger interferomtric arrays could have some impact, and will otherwise offer an independent check on the distance ladder.

*SDSS 9* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7137 This is the first Sloan Digital Sky Survey using the BOSS Spectroscope, and it is a giant leap. Included are 100,000 new quasar spectra, and 535,000 new galaxy spectra, all with finer details than any previous SDSS data release. The resulting refinements should give us some interesting new sense of some finer points in the history of the universe. This is the same thing highlighted in Nereid's recent thread. Any discussion should go there.

*Gravitational Waves At Home* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7176 Ever wish YOU could look for gravitational waves? For most of you, probably not often. However, that was probably because you had no facility to. This paper is about Einstein@Home, which is yet another crowd sourcing effort... this time to farm out the search through LIGO 5 data looking for Gravitational waves. Your chances of success are probably better than the SETI@Home search, and almost as momentous if you do find it.

[trinitree88]

Something remains amiss with models of massive galaxy formation , the authors show that the models either fail to yield the correct age populations or they fail to yield the observed metallicities, indicating more work needs to be done. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7073

[Jerry]

49 new papers, about 20 replacements. I don't know if I am just in a fun mood or someone spiked my decaf, but there are quite a few of interest:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0334.pdf Leaking Dark Matter Halos? Abraham Loeb is often throwing flies in the ointment, and this time he has teamed up with Behroozi and Wechslera to calculate how much dark matter has escaped from galaxy groups. (I've played with gravity-only model particles and they fly out of models all the time.) The authors conclude that the Milky Way should still be hanging on to >96% of the original Dark Matter mass, meaning, if it is out there, it is still out there.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0392 Related paper - leaked Dark Matter particles - whatever they are; found near or in our galaxy should be easier to detect than less energetic local dark stuff; so if we can ever find one, we need to get a handle on the velcity of the darn thing as well.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0580.pdf I grabbed this one because I had never heard of the Vainshtein Mechanism - (not a fun answer in a thesis defense). Anyway, the authors start with the assumption of a cubic cow and it goes down hill from there; (so even though I have heard of a Vainshtein Mechanism, it is still as abstract to me as the Couchy problem.) I think they conclude the Vainshtein Mechanism is vanishingly small compared with GR effects in the Hulse-Taylor pulser, and in any case beyond the detection of current instrumentation.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0390.pdf Is it possible, in the gravitational extreme in the core of a neutron star, for Bose-Einstein condensation to occur? This paper explores that notion. The authors find an intriging relationship between the temperature of a condensate onset and the strength of a magnetic field. I wonder: If a Bose condensates inside a neutron star, and no one is around to capture it, does it make any sound?

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0336 I'm just going to mention this paper on dynamic dark matter and ask the same question: Since we now know nothing about dark matter, is there any truck in assign dark matter additional, untestable properties?

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0157v1.pdf - similar problem here: Whether or not Neutrinos change flavor (tired neutrinos?) is a burning question because the sun is a few neutrinos short of a full quark. So when something explodes like a supernove; ya, there ought to be a boatload of neutrinos of all flavors; but unless something happens really close, it is just another tree falling in the forest.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0341 Galaxy growth and evolution will continue to be a hot topic for a very long time. This depthy Hubble Wide field 3 study favors and inside-out growth of galaxies that is...very complex. (I always get nervous when everything seems to get smaller with distance...except the number count of star-forming galaxies.) I can agree with the complex; and a good part of the papers is explaining why this study reaches different conclusions than earlier studies. Expect these results to stand no longer than the introduction of the James Webb telescope...if it ever flys.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0342 This is almost a sister paper of the Galaxy evolution paper right above, and it is interesting that they were posted on the same day. They find the core-collapse supernovae rate increasing with distance at a rate that is consistent with the increase in star-forming galaxies in cosmic look-back time. They correct for dust and stuff, and other systemics, but I still get to worry about underestimated lensing skewing the curve.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0506.pdf Another Hubble and Very Large Telescope gem; this time trying to track the luminosity function clear back to a redshift of z=7.

...and still another:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0489v1.pdf The star formation rate density pretty much follows model expectations out to about a redshift of one, and then, well, it gets complicated. KOBAYASHI, INOUE and INOUE take another look at the dust and tweak the model a bit so that there is more continuity into oblivion.

Isn't this a fun day? and there is more:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.0369.pdf Just when I bring up lensing, so do the experts; this time peering into our own galaxy trying to identify microlensed optical counterparts to hard Xray sources. Spoiler: most of the Xrays come from RS CVn type stars. Please note that I am not certain microlensing has anything to do with this study, other than that this was a microlense campaign.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0443 I didn't read this one, but I get to coment on the abstract. The author's use Dark Matter annihilation to solve the Li abundance problem...they seem to be forgetting that assigning one sticky problem special properties in order to quench another challenge to a theory is like ordering a non-existent Division of tanks to protect a city.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0449 Same problem - is this the same abstract? Using Dark Matter and Dark Energy as iterative functions of each other. At least they are using the solution as a constraint. I'm just not quite sure what they are constraining.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0559 This paper calls inflation the 'most successful theory about expansion in the early universe' and then goes on to explain why inflation fails and how to fix it. It is a fairly easy read and does a great job conceptualizing inflation. This paper could also be titled: Inflation - beyond round cows.

[antoniseb]

From 02 Aug 2012

There are 65 papers today (Thursday), not counting replacements. Note, Tensor was on vacation, and I got distracted by the busy-work of a no-injury car accident (someone took off my bumper in a parking lot)... so this one is a day late. It was the case that Thursdays papers were quite technical, and none really caught my interest on the first pass, but here are a token few.

Topics: *Dust Growth, LPSE, 130 GeV*

*Dust Growth* http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0304 How does dust grow? This paper looks at applying a Maxwellian distribution to collision velocities, and shows that the low-velocity tail provides a great deal of the dust growth, and perhaps answers issues that previous simulations had trouble with.

*LPSE* http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0281 LPSE (Large Scale Polarization Explorer) is a balloon-bourn mission to try and mearure B-mode polarization (curl) which can be used to strongly constrain models of inflation, and can also be important for measuring foreground information about the magnetic field of the Milky Way. Both of these are pretty important to various parts of cosmology's advancement, though the inflation part is my big interest. Being able to narrow the options of how inflation might have played out is pretty interesting.

*130 GeV* http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0267 I keep going on about the 130 GeV gamma rays coming from the galaxy center. This paper extends it a bit, and shows that there *might* be identical gammas coming from nearby galaxy clusters (Virgo especially), and maybe nearby dwarf galaxies, though the dwarf galaxy stats are much weaker. Nota Bene: these are low statistics observations... still it adds a little more credence to the idea that this line (or these lines) might be a sign of dark matter WIMPs.

[antoniseb]

*From 6 August 2012*

There are 48 papers today (Monday), not counting replacements. I am a bit weary from some very early morning watching of NASA TV, so there might have been a few other papers that would have normally excited me, but today, you get these.

Topics: *Cluster Mass, Wide Companions*

*Cluster Mass* http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0597 There are a number of ongoing research efforts that make it useful to have masses of giant clusters of galaxies determined by several independent methods to give confidence to the numbers. Lots of secondary effects that might later be used on more distant clusters depend on this. This paper is the first of several papers looking to accomplish this with giant xray bright clusters. http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0602 & http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0605 are parts II & III, http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0606 is a paper looking at perhaps the same clusters, measuring the SZ effect.

*Wide Companions* http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0626 Every once in a while I get questions about whether the Sun could have a very dim companion star (or brown dwarf, or something Jupiter-like that is less massive than a brown dwarf), and the answer is we really don't know. This paper is about a search through Hipparcos astrometry data to try and find neighboring stars that have distant companions, looking at distances from say 70 to 2000 times the distance from the Sun to Neptune away from nearby stars. (Gaia will be able to do this even better, but this is good for now). The results give us a clue as to how uncommon it is for wide companions, and the distribution of their separations.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 7 Aug 2012

CATEGORIES: REALLY BASIC SOLAR SCIENCE, DARK MATTER, EXOPLANETS, MISC

My favorite paper this week is about the position of the Sun in the sky.

This week there were a lot of papers about detecting dark matter using neutrinos or gamma rays. I'll just list some here, for those who are interested. I don't understand this topic, myself.

---

REALLY BASIC SOLAR SCIENCE

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1043 - The sun's position in the sky

With all these astronomy papers about fancy scientific observations which require stupendously expensive telescopes or other equipment to study, it's refreshing to see one about something as simple and everyday as the position of the Sun in the sky. I can just imagine what someone like Tycho Brahe or Johannes Kepler would have thought if they had their hands on this paper.

---

DARK MATTER

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0827 - New Sensitivity to Solar WIMP Annihilation using Low-Energy Neutrinos
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0834 - A novel way of constraining WIMPs annihilations in the Sun: MeV neutrinos

These researchers independently studied the same idea, reaching similar conclusions.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1010 - Bremsstrahlung signatures of dark matter annihilation in the Sun
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0828 - Are Lines From Unassociated Gamma-Ray Sources Evidence For Dark Matter Annihilation?

---

EXOPLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0942 - The Detection and Characterization of a Nontransiting Planet by Transit Timing Variations

This paper describes both theory and practice of detecting and studying a non-transiting planet indirectly, via variations in a transiting planet. The data comes from Kepler, of course, and was part of a study searching for exomoons (via transit timing variations).

---

MISC

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1106 - The Formation and Evolution of Massive Black Holes

This is an easy to read review of current theories on massive black holes. It looks and reads like a chapter from a nicely polished textbook.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.0996 - An Integrated Aerial Telecommunications Network that Supports Emergency Traffic

Inspired by Hurricane Katrina, this paper proposes a system of aerial platforms for a wireless communications network during emergencies. This seems like a more worthy goal than setting up a transatlantic network of communications drones for stock trading (an altogether different idea that's apparently floating around for no good reason).

[StupendousMan]

Papers which appeared Wed, Aug 8, 2012. Only four papers jumped out and grabbed me; one of them may be of interest to readers of a recent thread on the mass distribution in galaxies.

Hα Kinematics of S4G spiral galaxies I. NGC 864 shows a very detailed look at the velocity of gas in a nearly face-on spiral galaxy. The authors use a Fabry-Perot camera to determine the velocity of gas with high spatial resolution. If you look at the figures, you'll see that the motions of gas are much more complex than simple circular orbits. Reading the paper will give you a good sense for the difficulty of measuring masses of galaxies using their rotation curves.

Solar like oscillations in the stars KIC 5390438 and KIC 5701829 observed by Kepler is pretty well summarized by the title. The authors measured very small variations in the light of two stars -- one a main sequence star, the other a red giant -- and identified a series of periodic variations due to acoustic waves propagating in the outer atmospheres of the stars. Similar oscillations are seen on our Sun. Careful modelling of these oscillations can provide very precise information on the physical properties of the stars.

AT Cnc: A Second Dwarf Nova with a Classical Nova Shell describes the discovery of an extended envelope (a very faint one) of material around the dwarf nova AT Cnc. Dwarf novae and classical novae both involve mass transfer between two very close members of a binary system, one of which is a white dwarf. In each case, irregularities in the flow of material produce brief outbursts of radiation -- the systems can increase in brightness by 1 or 2 or 5 or 10 magnitudes for a few days or weeks. The exact mechanisms are somewhat different for the two types of nova. Some models suggest that a system can switch from one type to the other over time, and here the authors find evidence for just the second time that such a switch has occurred.

A simple and robust method for automated photometric classification of supernovae using neural networks Supernovae come in several different flavors, based on the mechanism of the explosion (core collapse in a massive star or mass transfer onto a white dwarf) and on the properties of the star which explodes (how much hydrogen or helium remains in the outer atmosphere? how much mass does it have overall?). The usual method of classifying these explosions involves an expert human inspecting a spectrum. That's expensive in two ways: there aren't many human experts (and most of them are busy), and it takes a big telescope and lot of time to acquire a spectrum of a supernova. There are plenty of telescopes which can measure light curves of supernovae with little effort, and there are LOTs of computers just lying around which have plenty of CPU cycles to spare. If one could train a computer to recognize the different types of supernova simply by examining the light curves of events, one could keep up with the flood of data which is coming from a number of surveys.

[Tensor]

For 8 August 2012

There were 56 papers Of those there were 35 new, 4 cross posted, leaving 17 replacements. Besides the papers below, there was a large number and variety on various solar observations, a couple more on the Chemical composition of the IGM, a couple more on accretion disks and finally, several different papers on cosmic rays. For those who want to check out other papers, they can find them here

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1504 Star Formation in Atomic Gas
Mark R. Krumholz

Observations indicate that star formation almost exclusively in the molecular parts of the ISM. Krumholz shows that at extremely low metallicities, in well UV shielded areas, star formation can occur prior to the ISM becoming molecular, starting while the ISM is atomic.

The Chemodynamical Evolution of the Milky Way Disc I: The Solar Vicinity
Minchev, C. Chiappini, M. Martig

Interesting look at how models are developed. Starting from N-body large scale simulations, they then incorporate galaxy size simulations. This is the first simulation to incorporate a full chemical evolution. They use current observational constraints to guide how the simulation runs. The model, matches well with the nearby solar region and a follow on paper will describe the entire disk, including the bar.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1584 Evolution of the Most Massive Galaxies to z ~ 0.6: II. The link between radio AGN activity and star formation
Yan-Mei Chen et al

This paper compares massive radio loud galaxies with massive radio quiet galaxies as a control. It is found that radio quiet galaxies have almost twice the star formation rate of radio loud galaxies. This suggests that these galaxies go through a cycle where gas accretes, which leads to an increase of star formation and and then to the formation of a jet, which shuts down everything, until the cycle starts again. It’s also found that larger z galaxies have larger star formation rates, with louder radio jets.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1617 Characterizing Foreground for redshifted 21-cm radiation: 150 MHz GMRT observations
Abhik Ghosh, Jayanti Prasad, Somnath Bharadwaj, Sk. Saiyad Ali, Jayaram N. Chengalur

While the foreground source subtraction for the WMAP is rather well known, the determination of the foreground sources for the 21 cm HI signal is less known. This paper looks at how those sources are determined, and some of the possible difficulties subtracting these foreground sources.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1739 Evolution of the Population of Very Strong MgII Absorbers
Paola Rodríguez Hidalgo, Kaylan Wessels, Jane Charlton, Anand Narayanan, Andrew Mshar, Antonino Cucchiara, Therese Jones

This paper looks at the difference in the iron/magnesium ration. High redshifts have a smaller ratio with larger velocity spreads. This could indicate either more intense stellar winds, caused by increased star forming areas or less iron at high z, due to early stages of star formation.