Fun Papers In Arxiv

[antoniseb]

From 11 Jun 2012

There are 47 papers today (Monday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Planet in a Double, 130 GeV, SN 1b,c GRBs, Long Wavelength Astronomy, PBHs*

*Planet in a Double* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1592 A few days ago, someone asked about how they name planets in a double star system. A good answer was given, but here's an example. Two stars about 400 light years from here orbit each other once every 3500 Earth years, and the brighter one has a hot jupiter with a 4 day orbit. The whole system is called HD 42176 (a catalog reference). It is also, since being part of this planet serach effort cataloged as KELT-2 (after the Kilodegree Extremely Little Telescope), and the planet is around KELT-2A (the primary), and is called KELT-2Ab. The paper gives more interesting details about the system, and how it was observed.

*130 GeV* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1616 More on the 130 GeV feature, in this paper they look at the possibility that it is two lines at 110 and 130, and are associated with a 145 GeV WIMP.

*SN 1b,c GRB Model* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1684 Some GRBs are coincident with SN type 1b, or 1c. This paper proposes that THOSE SNs could involve the progenitor star having a close neutron star companion which is able to promptly gain enough gravitational in-fall mass during the SN explosion that IT crosses the line and becomes a black hole (causing the GRB). Hence only a small minority of these SN would also be GRBs.

*Long Wavelength Array* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1799 If you could look at at the sky with 10 to 88 MHz eyes, what could you see? (above 88MHz you might see a lot of broadcast FM media brightspots). The Long Wavelength Array is 53 stations spread over 400 km that will give a few arcsecond resolution of the sky at these wavelength. There are lots of things this can see, but to me the most interesting is the 21 cm Hydrogen line redshifted to z=140 to z=20... i.e. back to the dark ages.

*PBHs* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1685 I see frequent papers about Primordial Black Holes formed at the end, or during slow-roll inflation. What makes this paper stand out is that the PBHs its model generates would have affected the early universe, but would have evaporated long ago, and are NOT candidates for today's dark matter.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 12 June 2012

CATEGORIES: LOGIC GAMES, TELESCOPES, ASTEROIDS

This week, I skimmed through more quickly than usual. I may have missed some papers I'd usually include.

---

LOGIC GAMES

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1880 - Escaping Prisoner’s Dilemmas

This paper is an amazing analysis of how changing the payoff matrix of Prisoner's Dilemma type games transform them. It includes an incredible array of charts and maps. This paper is a must if you're interested in a deep understanding of games.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1926 - The hardest logic puzzle ever becomes even tougher

I had never heard of George Boolos's "The hardest logic puzzle ever". If I had, I'm sure I also would have taken the title as a challenge. This paper describes modifications to make it more difficult. It's fun for logic puzzle lovers!

---

TELESCOPES

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1886 - Breakthrough capability for the NASA Astrophysics Explorer Program: Reaching the darkest sky

This space telescope proposal uses electric propulsion and a Mars flyby to reach a 15 degree inclined orbit. The idea is to get sufficiently off the ecliptic to avoid zodiacal glow.

---

ASTEROIDS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1888 - Long-Term Stability of Horseshoe Orbits

This paper has graphs showing where horseshoe orbits are stable, based on simulations. It's not super exciting or anything, but it's of interest to asteroid fans.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1962 - Recent collisional jet from a primitive asteroid

Another asteroid paper. This one studies the Lorre cluster.

[antoniseb]

From 13 June 2012

There are 47 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements. There were a few more papers than usual that focused on dwarf satellite galaxies, aside from that I didn't spot any special concentration on topics.

Topics: *Swift GRBs, X-Ray Background, Heavy Elements, Cosmic Magnetism, Beta-Beta*

*Swift GRBs* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2357 Thanks to *Swift*, we've had a farily good sense of what certain GRBs are for quite a while now, but this paper takes a closer look at one subset of GRBs, for which we have excellent observations of the x-ray afterglow, and makes some more detailed model for what we're seeing, and where the action is happening.

*X-Ray Background* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2375 This is a mission proposal. The mission is looking to put a 10 meter square X-Ray telescope that can resolve xray energy to within a hundred eV or so in the 1000 to 6400 eV range. The reason for this is that they calculate that between 5 and 10 percent of energy in that range is given off by ionized Iron in distant Active Galactic Nuclei, (at about 6400 eV, and then redshifted), and that this tool would provide data sufficient to create a very detailed map of the large scale structure of the observable universe.

*Heavy Elements* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2379 Where do the elements we are made of come from? The light ones are pretty well explained, but for some of the heavy ones we see, we mostly just wave our hands and say r-process (r for rapid). This paper looks at several scenarios (models) of neutron stars merging with either black holes or other neutron stars, and discovers that the ejecta (I didn't know there was surviving ejecta) turns into our element abundance in every case.

*Cosmic Magnetism* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2428 During inflation there was a rapid movement of charged particles, and magnetic fields probably resulted, and this might explain the 10-100 picoGauss field we might see in intercluster space (do we see it? hard to say, evidence is at the edge of observability right now). This paper looks at the changing magnetic field during the universe's early phase transitions, to estimate what we should see, and its characteristic scales and properties.

*Beta-Beta* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2560 There were press releases about the neutrinoless decay, and its implications. Here's a paper on the subject.

[Tensor]

There were 77 papers today and of those there were 40 new, 10 cross posted, leaving 27 replacements. There are various papers on galactic structure and formation, at various times in the universe. Several on star forming or starburst galaxies. And, two in the cross-list papers on the 130 GeV Gamma-Ray line. As always, those who want to check out other papers can find them here

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2653 Constraining the variation of fundamental constants at z ~ 1.3 using 21-cm absorbers
Rahmani, R. Srianand, N. Gupta, P. Petitjean, P. Noterdaeme, D. Albornoz Vasquez

Webb et al, in 2011 found that α was variable and varied depending on the direction. This work, using a different method, finds that not only α (thefine structure constant), but also g_p(proton gyromagnetic factor) and μ (proton-to-electron mass ratio), have a null result for variation out to z < 1.8 for α. Contrary to Webb’s result. I would expect an response to this from Webb’s group shortly.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2838 DEUS Full Observable ΛCDM Universe Simulation: the numerical challenge
Jean-Michel Alimi et al.

This struck as a good indication of the increasing power of computers and numerical simulations. In 2005, the Millenium Simulation ran over 2.2 BLY box with 10 10⁹ particles. Just last year, the Millenium XXL run was run in a 49 BLY box. This run, with 550 10⁹ particles is run in a 95 BLY box, essentially the entire visible
universe.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2887 GRB 090618: The First Example of a Neutron Star Gravitational Collapse to a Black Hole Induced by a Type Ib/c Supernova
Izzo, Jorge A. Rueda, R. Ruffini

This is kinda cool as they explain how a type 1b/c supernova could cause a neutron star companion to collapse to a blackhole, setting off a GRB. They compare their simulations to the observations of the GRB in the title.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2834 NGC 1624-2: A slowly rotating, X-ray luminous Of?cp star with an extraordinarily strong magnetic field
G.A. Wade,

This is another of those “firsts”. this star is found to have a 5.35 ± 0.5 kG - longitudinal magnetic field ⟨Bz⟩, and the first star O class star to have a report of Zeeman splitting of Stokes I profiles. This is consistent with a surface dipole strength at the poles >~ 20 kG. For comparison, the Sun’s strength is ~10G.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2895 Discovery of Two New Pulsars in Archival Data
Mitchell B. Mickaliger et al.

I just liked this as although the title says two, they mention a third one near the end of the paper. That third one was on the earlier unconfirmed list of this paper, but it was independently detected by the volunteers using the Einstein@Home processing software. As I and my daughters retired our older computers, I modified them and now have four computers running Einstein@Home.

[Jerry]

Only 37 new papers today. Let's start with the sun:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.3173.pdf ANOMALOUSLY WEAK SOLAR CONVECTION
Short version is the measured solar heat convection is much weaker than predicted by any existing model. Something is missing.


http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.3127v1.pdf Unveiling the secrets of gamma raysthis is a fairly simple primer on gamma rays - what we know and how we know it.

aslo:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.3124.pdf X-ray pulsars: a review

[antoniseb]

From 18 June 2012

There are 40 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *TMT Seeing, An Odd IMF, HH Jets, R Coronae Borealis, Tatooine*

*TMT Seeing* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3319 There are a few telescopes in the works in the 25-40 meter mirror-diamter range. This paper looks at the seeing conditions at the site selected for the TMT (Thirty Meter Telescope). It looks like a nice place... especially in the Summer.

*An Odd IMF* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3331 Initial Mass Function is a term used to describe what we observe as to the distribution of the masses and properties of stars as they form. Usually the cores in star-forming regions map nicely to the IMF... but the star forming region (IRAS 19410+2336) in this study does not. Millimeter-wave studies with ALMA show this one to be an oddball.

*HH Jets* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3391 At some stage in their formation, new stars shoot out jets from their poles. We call these Herbig-Haro objects. This paper looks at detailed images of the jets and knots in the two jets out of one fairly close HH object, and shows quite a few details, such as the period of the jet wiggle (~53 years), the speed of the knots, the distance to the thicker medium that stops the jets (250 AU), that the speed of the knots in the two jets are not the same, and numerous other details that will help model early stages of star and solar-system formation. (cool images).

*R Coronae Borealis* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3448 R Coronae Borealis is one of 65 known stars that are Hydrogen poor, Carbon rich supergiants... where do they come from? How can they form? A leading model for them indicates that they are the result of the merger of white dwarfs too low in mass to become a type 1a supernova. ... which *I* think makes them very worthy of much more detailed study, since SN1a are something we use to measure the universe. Knowing the upper and lower limits of these things (RCBs can help show the lower limit) is critical.

*Tatooine* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3484 Tatooine is a cultural reference in the title of this paper about the possible methods of formation of planets around binary stars. It looks at three known examples, and finds a reason to think that these planets formed far away from the stars and migrated in. http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3529 This paper covers more or less the same topic.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 19 June 2012

CATEGORIES: FUN STUFF, FROGS AND PROPELLERS

This week is also brief, but I have a good reason this time! I'm sitting in a hospital room with my sleeping wife and 12 hour old daughter.

This week in awesome is a study of a cubical planet. There's also a paper about the care and feeding of frogs around Saturn.

---

FUN STUFF

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3857 - The gravitational field of a cube

This paper ponders the shape of lakes and orbits around a planet shaped like a cube. It also ponders habitable zones and mountain climbing, and the lack of an improved view due to the flatness of the faces. I hope that the level of utility of cubical planet study goes without saying...

---

FROGS AND PROPELLERS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3972 - Care and feeding of frogs
http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3583 - Stochastic Flights of Propellers

These two papers study frogs and propellers in the Saturn system. The former has more abstract diagrams explaining ideas; the latter has more graphs showing data.

---

EXOPLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.3640 - The Study of Climate on Alien Worlds

This paper is a brief overview of the current state of the art in exoplanet climatology. It's short on details, but good for getting a sense of where things are and where they need to go.

[antoniseb]

From 20 June 2012

There are 51 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Distant SN, Cosmic Alignment, SERVS, Apodization, Planet-Forming Stars, Yarkovsky Drift*

*Distant SN* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4050 What is in the gas and dust in galaxies a long time ago? How does that change? We've looked at quasars to get that kind of information, but they are in the centers of galaxies. This paper looks at an ultraluminous SN at z=1.56 to see about the ratios of the ions and gasses that are between us and that SN. More importantly, the techniques being applied here will work out to z=~4 when the Thirty Meter Telescope comes on line. This could be an imprtant tool in understanding galactic evolution.

*Cosmic Alignment* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4055 Variation in the Fine Structure Constant (alpha) is a slightly dodgy idea that is getting traction, and the dipole of Dark Energy also seems near the limit of of observational abilities BUT both of these things have been measured in different directions and distances and seem to have dipole distributions. This paper looks that the dipole of the FSC distributions and the dipole of the Dark Energy distribution, and shows that they seem to be aligned. The authors speculate a little about a quintessence model that might explain this

*SERVS* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4060 The Spitzer Extragalactic Representative Volume Survey is a mid-IR survey of 18 square degrees looking back from now to z=5 in five well observed parts of the sky including (for example) the Lockman Hole. The idea is to try and get better data (not just anecdotal) about the distribution of various types of objects in different eras of the universe.

*Apodization* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4088 This is a paper about mirror design... which holds my interest (somewhat). It is about specialized coronographs for planet hunting, which holds my interest a lot more. But that it is doing it for a phase-induced amplitude apodization system caught my eye. I don't recall previously hearing the word *apodization* and I wondered whether the guys from Astronomy Picture Of the Day (APOD) knew about it when they named their site. I skimmed the paper, but still don't really know what apodize means.

*Planet Forming Stars* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4190 How many stars form terrestrial planets? This paper looks at the presumed process that formed the Earth and Moon and estimates that amount of warm dust present during various eras in our Sun's early history, and compares that to the amount of warm dust around young stars today, and finds that about 10% or less of such stars seem to be forming terrestrial planets.

*Yarkovsky Drift* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4299 The WISE probe is being used to get better predictions of the Yarkovsky Drift of 540 near Earth asteroids. This is an ongoing study, and this paper describes the techniques. Yarkovsky Drift is the small amount that asteroid orbits are perturbed by effects from sunlight and the asteroid's rotation. Knowing more about this will give us better ability to predict close passes and collisions with Earth.

[trinitree88]

There are still some things to be learned about the relationship between extinction and polarization in dust lanes and clouds. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4090

[Tensor]

There were 65 papers today and of those there were 41 new, 4 cross posted, leaving 20 replacements. Due to some early appointments I will not be able to peruse the rest of the papers to find similar subjects. For those who want to check out other papers, they can find them here

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4318 Galaxies behind the Galactic plane: First results and perspectives from the VVV Survey
B. Amôres et al.

This caught my eye as I don’t think many people think of exploring or determining the parameters of galaxies behind the galactic plane, much less, the galactic disk. The VVV ( Vista Variables in The Via La ́ctea) is trying to find and study galaxies behind the galactic plane and galactic bulge. 204 new candidates were found, with hopes of finding an additional 15,000 once some of the process is automated.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4319 HST measures of Mass Accretion Rates in the Orion Nebula Cluster
C.F. Manara, M. Robberto, N. Da Rio, G. Lodato, L. A. Hillenbrand, K. G. Stassun, D.R. Soderblom

Evolution of Pre-main sequence stars is poorly known both in observation and in theory as this is dependent on mass accretion of formation disk. As these processes take millions of years, they require large statictical samples of stars and stellar disks in the process of formation, samples that are currently lacking. This paper adds the statistical analysis of 700 sources in the Orion Nebula.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4344 Glancing views of the Earth. From a lunar eclipse to an exoplanetary transit.
García Muñoz , M. R. Zapatero Osorio , R. Barrena , P. Montañés-Rodríguez , E. L. Martín , E. Pallé

This was pretty cool as they are using measurements taken during lunar eclipses, to determine what type of atmosphere, the extent, and even what components might be in the atmosphere of exo-planets.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4382 A Systematic Review of Strong Gravitational Lens Modeling Software
Alan T. Lefor, Toshifumi Futamase, Mohammad Akhlaghi

Interesting bit here. I didn’t know that some software for gravitational lensing was freely available. This paper looks at, and reviews, various lensing packages. One thing that struck me and a friend of mine, (who is a diehard Apple disparagement specialist, along with being a Windows cheerleader, and was visiting when I wrote this up), was the number of packages available for OSX, compared to the number available for Windows. He wasn’t thrilled.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4500 Liquid methane at extreme temperature and pressure: Implications for models of Uranus and Neptune
Dorothee Richters, Thomas D. Kühne

Diamond mining in the outer solar system? They look at the electronic structure in low temperature simulations for methane in planetary conditions. They are checking to see if it is possible for diamonds to form in the center of Uranus and Neptune. Their conclusions? Don’t sell your De Beers stock.

[Jerry]

I couldn't find any fun papers last night, so I slept on it, and woke up to this gem:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.4842.pdf Hamiltonian dynamics and Noether symmetries in Extended Gravity Cosmology
Among the many balancing acts facing cosmologist today, is that of escaping from initial conditions to the observed universe without having everything fall into a black hole. Quantum gravity theories have to address these boundry conditions - inflating before gravity takes hold and collapses everything. To get there, they construct superminispaces; complete with rules about how and when this can and cannot collapse. Do I understand it? No, but fortunately the authors conclude that their model doesn't answer all of the pertinent questions, either.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.4942v1.pdf A modied \Type I migration" model for propeller moons in Saturn's rings
Ok, this is nice. It is generally assumed there is a good explanation somewhere for the 'non-Keplar' motions observed in Saturns herding moons. This solution is nice, because the authors also find a testable condition for their hypothesis. (As we all know, testability is the dividing line between a scientific theory and a theological one.)

[quotation]

Also from Friday:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4698
MAGNETIZATION OF CLOUD CORES AND ENVELOPES AND OTHER OBSERVATIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF RECONNECTION DIFFUSION
A. Lazarian, A. Esquivel, and R. Crutcher
Authors are basically arguing that magnetic reconnection in turbulent media happens fast enough to enable the diffusion of matter and magnetic fields, thus providing a solution to the magnetic flux problem of star formation that better agrees with observations than the long-standing ambipolar diffusion paradigm.

[antoniseb]

From Monday 25 June 2012

There were 48 papers today, not counting replacements. There seemed to be a few more than usual about gravity theories and clusters of galaxies... but mostly the usual distribution of topics. I selected seven today.

Topics: *Galactic Mergers, Starless Cores, Double Star Formation, Transverse Doppler, Gravitational Waves, GRB Rebrightening, Optical Pulsar*

*Galactic Mergers* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5004 Galaxies grow by merging. We have surveys looking back to z=2 and before. How does the elliptical central bulge grow over time from these mergers? How does its density profile change? How about the Dark Matter fraction? This paper looks at all that and graphs it out in epochs from z=2 to present.

*Starless Cores* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5008 This is part two in a set of papers about starless cores. In this case a set of Super-Jeans cores were observed in millimeter wave measurements, and found to have no observable substructure, even though a neighbor core was clearly collapsing into a star. The current measurements can't say why collapse is not happening (distinguish between turbulance vs. some other kind of non-thermal support). At the moment, these cores *could* have central masses as large as 20 Jupiter masses. Future observations with bigger/better instruments could rule that out or confirm it.

*Forming Double Star* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5215 Also in the star-forming category is this paper about millimeter wave studies with ALMA about the infall and kinematics of gas falling into a pair of more-massive-than-the Sun protostellar objects about 600 AU apart (20 times the Sun-Neptune distance).

*Transverse Doppler* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5032 There has been some discussion about using Transverse Doppler measurements of component galaxies in massive clusters with giant ellipticals in the core as a way to distinguish between GR and f(R) gravity models. This paper shows that this merely turns the mass of the cluster into a fully adjustable tuning parameter, and such measurements can make no distinction at all.

*Gravitational Waves* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5058 The next generation of LIGO (aLIGO) and similar instruments will have a sensitivity for detecting merging neutron stars out to 340 megaparsecs under the right circumstances of the plane of the orbit. Assuming that SWIFT's short GRBs are this kind of event, and guessing how many actually occur inside that sphere, how many should aLIGO see? This paper says between 10 and 180 per year. I think expectations should be at the low end of that.

*GRB Rebrightening* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5199 Sometimes GRBs rebrighten in the optical range quite a while after the initial blast. What cuases this? This paper looks at observations of GRB100814A to set some constraints on what that all might be.

*Optical Pulsar* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5149 Some pulsars are close enough that we can observe them in optical light. This is a paper about a seven thousand year old neutron star with a high proper motion, and an odd spectrum. I doesn't prove anything, but it is an interesting new data point.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 26 June 2012

CATEGORIES: ASTEROIDS, PLANETS, PHYSICS

This week there were a couple asteroid papers of interest to science fiction authors and game designers. One is a study of a self armoring effect, and the other is an example of an interesting asteroid setting.

---

ASTEROIDS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5564 - Cratering Experiments on the Self Armoring of Coarse-Grained Granular Targets

This study used relatively low velocity impactors against glass bead targets to investigate the self armoring effect of asteroids such as Itokawa and Eros. I think this would be particularly interesting for science fiction authors and game designers. While the impact velocities involved are too low to be directly applicable to space combat weapons, it nevertheless is particularly applicable to debris impacts (such as debris from nearby explosions) and small arms impacts.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5755 - ORBITS, MASSES, AND EVOLUTION OF MAIN BELT TRIPLE (87) SYLVIA

This is another paper of interest to science fiction authors and game designers, showing an example of an interesting asteroid setting.

---

PLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.4500 - Liquid methane at extreme temperature and pressure: Implications for models of Uranus and Neptune

I didn't really understand this paper, but it seems rather specific to Uranus and Neptune. In other words, the conclusions don't seem to be more generally applicable to exoplanets.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5347 - An Independent Planet Search In The Kepler Dataset I. A hundred new candidates and revised KOIs

This data and graph heavy paper uses the Kepler dataset for the authors's own transit method analysis. Take a look if you're interested in the transit method.

---

PHYSICS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5485 - Open timelike curves violate Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle

This paper, which has some nice explanatory diagrams, shows how Heisenberg's uncertainty principle can be violated even with timelike curves which don't close on themselves.

[antoniseb]

*From 27 June 2012*

There are 54 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements. This is many fewer than Yesterday's giant load, including *many* papers on GRBs (there must have been a conference).

Topics: *Grain Growth, Pop III, M67 Planets*

*Grain Growth* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5802 Planetary disks look different whether they are new or mature, and there is a transition between the two. This paper looks at grain growth as the explanation for all of the observed property changes, and concludes that it DOES explain it all. This is an important part of the planet formation process, and it is good to get confirmation, and a set of measurements to start building a more detailed picture.

*Population III Detection* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5806 What can Hubble and the JWST expect to see? The odds of even the JWST seeing z~15 population III stars is near zero... it might be exactly zero, we'll have to wait and see (or not)... BUT surrounding Pop II stars should be very low metalicity Population III galaxies, which should still have these properties through about z=10 to perhaps z=7. THESE galaxies, with the aid of forground lensing clusters should be observable in the near future, perhaps by Hubble, and almost certainly with JWST. This paper estimates the visual properties of such galaxies, so we know what to look for.

*Planets in M67* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5820 M67 is an old open cluster created about the same time the Sun was formed, and with similar metalicity to the Sun (the Sun may have formed there). *This* study looks for planets in this cluster, to see if we can determine properties of stellar mass and statistically what kinds/sizes of planets they might form within a very narrow range of Sun-like metalicities. This is a really cool idea. So far there are 11 candidate substellar companions (brown dwarfs and super-jupiters). Future work with the next generation of telescopes should reveal more.

[Tensor]

For 28 June 2012

There were 90 papers Of those there were 54 new, 4 cross posted, leaving 42 replacements. There were quite a few multi-paper subjects today. There were several papers on debris disks, pulsars, solar dynamics, gravitational waves, and different takes on metallicity. For those who want to check out other papers, they can find them here

Topics: Supernova EOS, Blazar Modeling, GRB Modeling, On-line Video Seminars, Exo-planet Atmospheres.

Supernova EOS http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6101 On the Importance of the Equation of State for the Neutrino-Driven Supernova Explosion Mechanism
Yudai Suwa , Tomoya Takiwaki, Kei Kotake , Tobias Fischer , Matthias Liebendoerfer , Katsuhiko Sato

As a fan of supernava, this is fun. This paper looks at the the effect of equations of state(EOS) in neutrino driven core-collapse supernova. Differences using 1 and 2 dimensional simulations using different EOS are explored.

Blazar Modeling http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6147 Multiwavelength Spectral Study of 3C 279 in the Internal Shock Scenario
Manasvita Joshi et al.

Pretty interesting comparison between the month long gamma ray flaring period in November of 2008 and the quiencent period in May of 2010. Spectral Energy Distribution is compared and then fitted with the Internal Shock Model to see if the this model can explain the two opposite states.

GRB Modeling http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6198 On the Spectral Lags and Peak-Counts of the Gamma-Ray Bursts Detected by the RHESSI Satellite
Jakub Ripa, Attila Meszaros, Peter Veres, Il H. Park

Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) are normally broken down into two groups: long and short bursts. In the Swift database, there seems to be a third, intermediate group. 427 GRB from the RHESSI database were studied statistically, and an intermediate group was also found in this database. Intermediate GRBs in both groups were similar to the short bursts. However, the intermediate groups in each database seem to be different phenomena.

On-line Video Seminars http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6273 IACTalks: an on-line archive of astronomy-related seminars
Johan H. Knapen eet al.

This paper links to an on-line video archive of astronomy related seminars located at the website: http://iactalks.iac.es (it’s also referenced in the PDF). Each of the seminars shows the speaker, along with the slides for the seminar.

Exo-planet Atmospheres http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6274 Temporal variations in the evaporating atmosphere of the exoplanet HD 189733b
A Lecavelier des Etangs et al.

This was a “who’d a thunk it” paper for me. Being able to partially determine the atmosphere of an exo-planet, much less being able to determine how much is evaporating from said atmosphere.

[trinitree88]

Here's a novel way to estimate dust extinction in the Milky Way, using NaI. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6107

[StupendousMan]

Here's a novel way to estimate dust extinction in the Milky Way, using NaI. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6107

What's interesting here is that two previous papers used the colors of STARS to derive reddening-to-sodium ratios, with similar-ish results; but this paper uses the infrared emission of dust to estimate reddening-to-sodium ratios, finding a much smaller value of reddening at similar sodium equivalent width.

It appears that we don't understand dust as well as we thought we did.

[Jerry]

57 new papers with just a few cross listings. Is it just me, or has the general tone of papers moved from a affirmative to a questioning prospective?


Comet properties: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6509
Particle scattering is one of the weakly studied bugaboos in light travel. Light we observe from comets is often quite highly polarized, which can give us clues about the nature of the dust surrounding comets. This simulation suggests large aggregates, rather than fine dust, is responsible for comet polarity.

Gravity: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.6755v1.pdf This single author paper is a fresh look at Machian gravity, which has always been my favorite. I'm not seeing the predicting power I expect if such a theory is correct but it might with the proper derivations of 'variable inertia'. In any case, it is fun to see so many are trying.

Photometric calibration: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.6695.pdf This one is fun in that Stubbs and Tonry are fleshing out some of the 'round cow' photometric models Neried entertained us with.

Dark Matter: http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6495 we are seeing more and more of this; baryonic matter where it was not thought to be. Perhaps Dark matter is not a requirement for mainstream physics to survive after all.

Cosmic origins: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.6527v1.pdf According to these authors, a universe without an initial, rapid accelleration is also a universe that does not require an inflationary period. Counter-intuitive, but since when did the universe have to answer to our intuition?

[tusenfem]

Jerry, stick to the papers themselves and don't try to sneak in your ATM views on gravity and DM.

[antoniseb]

From 2 July 2012

There are 45 papers today (Monday), not counting replacements. I had some difficulty trying to narrow down the list... lots of good ones today.

Topics: *4MOST, Reionization, SNe & GRBs, Quark Novae, CMB Foreground, Point Sources CMB, Cold Dust Clumps, Dark Energy*

*4MOST* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6885 The ESA is looking at building a 4-meter telescope with huge capabilities for producing high resolution spectra. This paper is a description of that instrument.

*Reionization* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6930 What caused the neutral gas in the 12<z<6 universe to ionize and become transparaent? Hot stars and AGNs in young galaxies is the hand-waving explanation, but we're not sure we can get enough ionizing radiation out of what we know was there at the time. This paper looks at a z=3 type of object and speculates that earlier correlaries might have done the job.

*SNe & GRBs* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6979 Some long GRBs are associated with some Supernovae. Now that we have a nice sample size, this paper takes a look at what we know about the supernaove and the progenitor stars.

*Quark Novae* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7113 Some supernovae are over luminous, and there is always the hope and speculation that some really exotic process that can eventually tell us about the properties of Quarks and related particles is going on somewhere we can see. This paper considers what we should be able to see if these SN are Dual Shock Quark Novae.

*CMB Foreground* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.6981 KBOs are cold, and radiate in the microwaves, a bit hotter than the CMB, but microwaves none-the less. Is it enough to be meaningful to WMAP studies? This paper shows that these, and related obects COULD account for the low-multipole anomalies that line up with the local solar system.

*CMB Point Sources* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7121 This is kind of mysterious, and my first skim of the paper didn't resolve the mystery, so I'll have to go back and read in detail. There are a bunch of point sources in the CMB. All but two have been identified. Some are QSOs, some are other kinds of objects. The mystery is about the unidentifieds. Point source in microwaves, but not obvious in any other spectrum? What the heck COULD they be?

*Cold Dust Clumps* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7027 This is a paper about 674 clumps of dust and gas which are cold starless cores as observed by the 13.4 meter Planck Telescope (note, this is not the CMB satellite, this is a ground-based instrument).

*Dark Energy Models* http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.7046 Our ability to see and measure the high-z universe keeps getting better. This paper re-examines what we know and can know about Dark Energy given the new data about earlier in the universe.

[antoniseb]

*Astronomy Papers that Caught My Eye in Todays arXiv*

There are 57 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements. This was a few more than usual, but I wasn't as fascinated as usual (my fault, or just a more pedantic batch than usual? I'm guessing my fault). Today is Higg's Day.

Topics: *Emergent Gravity, Gamma Rays from Orion, 130 GeV*

*Emergent Gravity* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0505 This is a 38 page paper by one author... often a caution sign. In this paper we look at Gravity, Dark Energy, Inflation, Space, and their relationship in a way that may have Gravity (in a GR sense) emerge from holographic equipartition. This is an interesting idea, but I think it explores some concept-space a little distant from actual observations, and hence can't be distinguished from competing theories for a long time to come.

*Gamma Rays From Orion Molecular Cloud* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0616 What is the Orion Molecular Cloud made of? This paper looks at the gamma rays coming from that direction which seem to be the results of Cosmic Rays hitting the gasses and dust in the cloud. The science here is interesting all by itself, but it got me wondering... There are some folks opposed to the idea of dark matter saying that perhaps there is 10-20 times as much baryonic matter in the galaxy as is currently thought... and they are looking for all possible ways to hide that matter so it wouldn't be seen easily. I think this has potential to be extended to disprove some of these hiding ideas.

*130 GeV* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0800 What is that 130 GeV line? This paper looks at what SHOULD be the fallout from neutralino-neutralino annihilation in the center of the galaxy, and determines that this line cannot be the result of THAT interaction. It doesn't really speculate about what else it might be.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 3 July 2012

CATEGORIES: WORMHOLES, PLANETS, GAME THEORY

This week's awesome paper is a method by which we could telescopically tell the difference between a wormhole and a black hole.

---

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0047 - Can we distinguish between black holes and wormholes by their Einstein ring systems?

This paper looks at the difference in appearance of the Einstein rings around a black hole vs a wormhole, and that we could use this to tell the difference from afar. Not that there are any known black hole candidates close enough to take a Soyuz ride to the Gamma Quadrant, but it could still be useful for science fiction authors.

---

PLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0101 - Kepler-16b: a resonant survivor

This paper analyzes the 11/2 resonance of Kepler-16b with its central binary, with nice graphs and explanation of how the neighboring resonance cells are purged by the planet.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0155 - Saturn’s Rings are Fractal

This short and sweet paper analyzes Cassini images to determine Saturn's rings have a fractal dimension.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0038 - A Detailed Investigation of the Proposed NN Serpentis Planetary System

As the title says, this investigation is rather detailed. It's a good read if you're curious about how long term stability analysis is used in multi-planet exoplanet discovery/analysis.

---

GAME THEORY

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0037 - The Uniform Distribution in Incentive Dynamics

This paper has nice graphs showing convergence or non-convergence of rock-papers-scissors type games.

[antoniseb]

From 05 July 2012

There are 37 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *Hi-RES Optical, Young Planets, Metalicity & Planets, Another DM Issue*

*Hi-RES Optical* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0808 This only works for imaging very bright (individual stars brighter than 8th magnitude, preferable 3rd or better) and best for blue objects, but this paper proposes a method of using the hardware for Air Cherenkov Telescope Arrays (big low-quality light buckets) spread over a few kilometers for getting images of stars down to 30 microarcseconds... which should be enough to image the surfaces and shapes of many of the closer giant stars. (My back of the envelope calculation says alpha centauri should be about 20 pixels across). This has a lot of potential places to give new details. Perhaps the most exciting to me is if we image a newly errupting nova.

*Young Planets* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0818 Hot Jupiters in the Beehive... I saw an article about this last night... here's the actual paper. The reason this caught my eye is that the Beehive is fairly new (not as new as the Pleiades, but new). And so these two hot Jupiters in this nearby cluster is a data point about the time and ways of planet forming.

*Metalicity & Planets* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1012 One relationship we expected to see is that stars formed with higher concentrations of heavier elements should have more and heavier planets than do stars with lower concentrations. The data is still very sparse (discountable), but it is looking like this is true, especially for non-Jupiters. The paper talks about the specific case of a 16 Earth Mass planet in a 6 day orbit.

*Another DM Issue* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1050 & http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1053 The Xenon100 and simialr experiments are looking for a difference in the number of events depending on which way the Earth is going around the Sun relative to the overall stream of orbiting Dark Matter. One thing I've wondered about is addressed here. If the Milky Way was assembled by mergers, and DM is only bound gravitationally, wouldn't that result in a substantial fraction of the DM orbiting against the stream of baryonic matter?... resulting in little difference calendar-wise for Xenon100 and related experiments?

[Jerry]

Light day for papers - meaning I am not the only one engrossed in letour.

Let's start with yet another new kind of gravity paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.0173 Fun papers are the most fun when they propose new basic theories that are testable. The bad news is, a specific mission to gravitational saddle points with precise instrumentation designed to study gravity...which is also the good news - we need better data.

Supernova paper:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.1306.pdf Another good-news bad-news - they have possibly identified the source object(s); the bad new is there are a lot of atypical spectral lines in the explosion spectra; meaning this may be a not-so-normal type Ia event.

[antoniseb]

*From 06 July 2012*

There are 37 papers today (Friday), not counting replacements. Note: Jerry also went through this list, but I suspect had that same uninspired feeling I had on Tuesday. There were more papers than usual about alternatives to GR gravity. I didn't include his.

Topics: *CMB in 5 Years, Unidentified Gamma Source, Disappearing Disk, Pre-Brown Dwarf, OGLE Binary*

*CMB in 5 Years* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1105 With current on-going missions, what can we expect to know about Dark Energy and related topics (e.g. neutrino mass) in five years? This paper looks at what CMB polarization studies will be able to show us and constrain about these topics.

*Unidentified Gamma Sources* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1129 Fermi-LAT has been scanning the skies, and collecting information on sources of gamma rays, This paper looks at the two brightest unknown gamma sources outside the plane of the galaxy. They used Chandra (an x-ray telescope) and other instruments to look at the same regions of the sky, where they found roughly ten different xray sources in each of the fields of view. In one case, it looks like the source is a black-widow millisecond pulsar, but in the other case, we still don't have a solid guess as to which xray source is the gamma source.

*Disappearing Disk* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1162 I am very interested in seeing changes in planet forming systems. I look forward to our having realistic numbers about the rates of change in these systems... and this paper, if it is to be believed, shows a reduction of a factor of 30 over one year in the IR from a warm dusty disk in such a system, indicating that the inner disk has been swept away. How? That is a mystery so far, and merits much more detailed study.

*Pre-Brown Dwarf* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1220 Do Brown Dwarfs form like bigger stars, or some other way? I feel it is likely that they mostly form like stars, even down to jupiter-sized objects, but this is definitely a topic open for observation to establish constraints... This paper shows a 20-Jupiter mass obect forming like a star. This is one data point, so no statistical statement can be made about the ratio of how many are formed one way versus another.

*OGLE-Binary* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1244 OGLE is pretty cool. It just stares at a dense background looking for microlensing events, constraining our guesses about how many dim/dark object are floating around in the galaxy. In 2007 it saw a bright one with an odd contour. This paper shows it is likely a binary with a white dwarf/neutron star as the primary, and something with 0.2 solar masses (a Helium core?) as the secondary.

[antoniseb]

From 9 July 2012

There are 53 papers today (Monday), not counting replacements. Lots of FERMI data.

Topics: *Planemos, 130 GeV, Tides & Clocks*

*Planemos* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1449 How many sub-stellar objects get formed in star forming areas? Are they twice as numerous as stars as microlensing data suggests? This study shows that they are much less numerous than that in young cluster NGC1333. Interesting results.

*130 GeV* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1621 Just a minor part of a big story... the distribution of the 130 GeV line near the center of the galaxy is slightly offset from the center. This paper shows that it could easily be a low-count statistical anomaly, which will clear up with more photons.

*Tides and Clocks* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1507 So how much do the tidal redistribution of ocean mass affect time as we measure it? This paper works it out to around one part in 10^19.

[IsaacKuo]

Fun Papers from arXiv - From 10 July 2012

CATEGORIES: MISC, EXOPLANETS, COSMOLOGY

This week in awesome is Planeterrella, a science demonstrator/experiment which simulates auroras/space weather around the Sun and Earth.

There's also a perhaps troubling paper about how much confidence you should have in the computational results from MatLab, Octave, or Scilab.


---

MISC

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1866 - The Planeterrella experiment: from individual initiative to networking

This is different! Planeterrella is an affordable open source physical demonstrator/experiment made of plexiglass and metal spheres. It a demonstrator in the tradition of the popular Van Der Graff generator. Planeterrella simulates auroras/space weather around the Sun and Earth (not to scale). This paper discusses the scientific things it demonstrates, as well as discussing the educational/scientific outreach potential and artistic interest.

In this day and age when most interactive museum exhibits use computers and LCD displays, a good old fashioned "Mad Science" plasma device is exciting stuff!


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1916 - HOW GOOD ARE MATLAB, OCTAVE AND SCILAB FOR COMPUTATIONAL MODELLING?

If you find the words "presented an unacceptable low accuracy in a single dataset" trouble you, read this paper. Now. Do it even if you don't use MatLab, Octave, or Scilab, because you know someone who does.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1844 - Pulsatile Drug Delivery System Based on Electrohydrodynamic Method

This paper describes a 3mm scale device to dispense drug droplets. It seems to me to have some common features with FEEP electric thrusters, and the technology may be applicable to microthrusters for small satellites or small robots. I could see the EHD pulse dispensing a small pulse of propellant into a microthruster chamber for a pulsed thruster.

Or you could just inject one of these devices into Snake Plissken.

---

EXOPLANETS

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1747 - A 40 MYR OLD GASEOUS CIRCUMSTELLAR DISK AT 49 CETI: MASSIVE CO-RICH COMET CLOUDS AT YOUNG A-TYPE STARS

This paper presents a colliding comet model to explain the CO seen at 49 Ceti and HD 21997. Among the implications is that young comets are richer in CO and maybe CO2 than currently observed solar system comets. The authors contrast their model with the superficially similar comet destruction model proposed for Fomalhaut.

This paper is interesting for its implications on planetary system development, and perhaps also for its implications on what sort of resources may be exploitable in the cometary systems of other star systems. This may seem like a useless thing to know for us, since we won't be venturing out into other star systems any time soon, but it can be significant for speculations on alien civilizations which may already be out there traveling among the stars.

For example, I like to speculate on what simplistic alien von neumann probes might be like. Such probes might be designed only to exploit some particular type of resource matching particular parameters, which would explain why they are not already obvious within our solar system. Any sort of difference between other star systems and our own could be a significant distinction (such as comets rich in CO/CO2 ice).


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1907 - Dust cloud lightning in extraterrestrial atmospheres

This paper studies the conditions for and properties of dust cloud lightning in hot gas giants and brown dwarfs. While this seems rather irrelevant for potentially life bearing exoplanets, it could still be of interest to science fiction authors/artists/etc depicting the dark side of such planets/dwarfs.

---

COSMOLOGY

http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1823 - Weak gravitational lensing by fourth order gravity black holes

This paper calculates what the deflection curves of black hole Einstein rings would be like under modified gravity functions. It briefly discusses what sorts of modified gravity functions could be alternatives to dark matter and dark energy, before delving into the main thrust of the study--which is to calculate something that could be experimentally tested. Near future radio telescopes will have sufficient resolution for this.

Speaking as a non-scientist who isn't up to speed on cosmology science, I would have associated this study with "MOND", or modified newtonian dynamics. I suppose this term is outmoded and out of fashion. At the very least, it's not accurate--at least not for this paper, since it's a modification to GR rather Newtonian gravity. As I understood it years ago, MOND started off using Newtonian gravity since the math was easier, but the scientists investigating it had always intended to graduate to something closer to GR if the approach looked promising enough to be worth the extra effort.


http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.1720 - Spherical Shell Cosmological Model and Uniformity of Cosmic Microwave Background

I don't know how seriously to take this paper. It presents what seems to me to be a really strange cosmological model, where the visible universe is the entire universe--shaped like an expanding hypersphere, such that the CMB is actually light from the antipodal point from us. I find this theory ridiculous from the start, because it would seem to imply we should also see immensely magnified objects near the antipodal point. Actually, galaxies more than halfway around would optically look bigger than closer galaxies, but still with increasing redshift.

...ugh. I'm no cosmologist but this theory seems ludicrous just from the optical implications and the doppler shift. Regardless, I'm including it because I think it's fun to think about.

[antoniseb]

From 11 July 2012

There are 53 papers today (Wednesday), not counting replacements.
Topics: *M87, Heavier DM, z>6 Hydrogen*

*M87* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2147 M87 is a nearby giant elliptical with a tremendous jet coming out of its core. From 2005 to 2007 the core of this monster was quiet, and so near-TeV gammas from this mostly came from the core, not from other regions that would be more active during accretion events. This paper was about data accumulated from MAGIC and FERMI looking at this object during that period to see what could be learned about the structure and mechanism that drives it all.

*Heavier Dark Matter* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2412 This paper looks at 100-GeV to Multi-TeV radiation coming from the galactic core, and speculates about more massive forms of WIMP dark-matter.

*z>6 Hydrogen* http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.2155 Looking waaay back to a couple of quasars at about z=6.3 this team looked for the levels of Lyman Alpha emissions in hopes of learning some details about the star formation rates in active galaxies in the early universe. Less Lyman Alpha was observed than expected. The paper gives the details of what was observed, but leaves most speculation about the reason for after more observations have been made.

[trinitree88]

A new survey finds 603 new point sources in the 7 year WMAP data @ 5 sigma. SEE:http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.5852