Also for 4 Januray 2012
I'm planning on switching between IsaacKuo, Tensor, and Jerry ... but as IsaacKuo pointed out, we don't know whose turn it is yet.
I think we'll plan for IsaacKuo to get the Tuesday night -> for Wednesday batch. Jerry will get the Thursday night -> for Friday batch. Tensor can tell me which night he wants of the remaining three, and I'll take the other two.
Since this wasn't worked out ahead of time, I did a batch of them last night too, which I show below. He picked one of mine, and a few I considered ... plus a few life sciences papers. Very cool. Me posting on the same day as the others is not the plan, it is just a quirk of getting organized too slowly.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0010 is about detecting GRBs using the IACT air-shower telescope. Last week I pointed to a couple of papers showing dim hopes of seeing them with IceCube, but this paper looks at the Gamma count near 100GeV using Fermi-LAT, and determines that with new equipment sensitive to lower energy air showers, they could potentially see one or two GRBs per year. The science of very high energy gamma sources is still sparsely known.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0072 speaking of very high energy observations, this paper is about making a much larger part of the antarctic ice into a high energy neutrino detector. In this case, the believe that neutrinos produce acoustic signals when they interact with rigid materials like ice, with a characteristic frequency of about 10kHz. Sound transmission characteristics of ice mean that they can plant a very sparse set of detectors and detect some aspects of high energy neutrinos in a much larger volume of ice, and hopefully get some better statistical sampling at higher energies than we get now.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0370 Is a paper that works to answer a question I hear relatively often... how much has the Sun moved toward or away from the center of the galaxy? Now that we believe (know) that the Milky Way is a barred spiral, perhaps the variation is wider than we thought. This paper basically puts those ideas to rest. In 4.6 billion years, the Sun has been only a few hundred parsecs closer or further than it is now.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0551 I was hoping for more pictures, but the paper is still cool. They used Chandra (xray telescope) to look at 53 edge on spiral galaxies to study their coronae. These galaxies were in various stages of starburst (or not), and could be divided into five maningful categories. This is a useful alternate look at the nature of spiral galaxies. I don't think that the conclusions will rock any boats.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0639 <are we there yet?> This paper is about H.E.S.S. observations of the LMC. The one image is kind of sad. The LMC is such a rich source at almost every part of the spectrum, but at the very high energy gamma ray part, it has one source (N 157B) a pulsar wind nebula. "But Wait!" you must be thinking... what about SN1987A (24 year old supernova remnant)? That should be a hot source. But it isn't. This paper shows the efforts made to observe it, and to try and sift through the photons from N157B to see if any could be from SN1987A. Someday we'll have the instruments to know what happened to that collapsar.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0163 The fly-by anomoly is an observation that probes zipping past the Earth (and other planets) trying to get a gravity assist often get slightly different (one part in a hundred million) assist than expected. This paper is a proposal for a cheap way to get more and better data for testing this possibly existent effect.