I have been posting this same collection in Google+ every weekday. Those who read Fraser Cain's G+ already know this. In any case, I ask that if you want to discuss any of these, please start a separate new thread.
From arXiv.org, November 7th, 2011
There were quite a few good ones today. I skipped some about GeV and Tev looks at Blazars, because I've been over-reporting on these a bit lately. I also skipped an amusing one about the detectability of unpiloted spaceprobes from other stars in our solar system (#57). The ones I did pick are even cooler.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0966 is a paper that takes a close look at the recent Type 1a SN in nearby M101. The availability of good quality (Hubble et. al.) images from pre- and immediately post explosion place very strong constraints on the type(s) of objects that could have been the progenator. Not that there has been MUCH doubt that it is White Dwarfs that turn into Type 1a SNs, but this paper pretty much nails it, allowing a small chance that it could be explained by a neutron star making a transition during a merger.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0969 is a product of the Galaxy Zoo project which is crowd sourcing the catagorization of millions of galaxies from SDSS and other broad deep surveys. I like the GZ project. It is a fun useful way for interested amateurs to make useful contributions. In this case they look at the differences that lead to disk galaxies with bars vs. disk galaxies with bulges, and find that barred spirals have higher dark matter to baryonic matter ratios.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0972 is a paper about massive Young Steller Objects forming at the edge of bubbles detected by Spitzer (i.e. old supernova remnats). This is not unexpected, but it confirms the idea of triggered star formation by SNs compressing gas and dust clouds.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0994 and http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1137 are papers from Kepler data about Sun-like stars. The first is very short paper about astroseismology looking at stellar ring-tones ( ha ha I coined a term) to see how they compare on the inside to the Sun. The second is a look at Sun spots on other stars, and rotation rates. This gives a nice look at the range of various parameters within the subset of stars that are like the Sun spectrally and size-wise.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1157 is a math-heavy paper about Axions as dark matter. Now, with the apparent non-detection of ~100 GeV Neutralinos by CERN, I'm keeping my eye out for other forms that Dark Matter could come in. This paper's title suggested it might answer my biggest doubt about Axions (it didn't), which is that they have a proposed mass of about ten millionths of an electron Volt... how in this universe could they ever slow down enough to be gravitationally bound to a galaxy or galaxy cluster? Somewhere I think someone will write about how being Bose-Einstein particles enables them to lose energy and thermalize... but I didn't see that here.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.1158 Frequent readers know I'm curious about neutron stars. This paper examines isolated neutron stars to tell us what we know and can know. It includes a few new graphs about the spin-down as they age, among other things. Very readable.