If we read description of ATM Section it is:
"Post here if you want to discuss a hypothesis that is currently outside the scientific mainstream. Have a beef with relativity, heliocentrism, the Big Bang? Have a speculation that you want exposed to scientific scrutiny? This is the place."
Goldstone post it is definitively not such kind of theory.
It is based on mainstream documents. If you read the papers linked (I did) you will see, it has nothing to do with being against heliocentrism...
I have read a lot of ATM threads, and most of you probably confirm, that most of people here does not argue with scientific arguments. Even me ;-) (P.S. It was all of you, who forced me to learn, to buy books and read all nights ;-)
Maybe community would consider to open new forum in "The Proving Grounds", for scientific, mainstream theories under construction (f.e. Mainstream Fights) It is enough to make at the beginning short 3-questions test for authors if they understand what Lagrangian is, etc.
I support Goldstone.
His theory does not match here* (*ATM).