Are we going to have to go through this every single time you choose to post here, A.DIM?
First: Panspermia is categorically an ATM topic. It is not appropriate for LiS. You know this. Do not pretend you don't know better by now.
Second: Don't pretend you're not indirectly advocating for panspermia. I don't think there's anybody left who doesn't see right through that little game.
Third: You also know that you've had several "kicks at the can", and you're entitled to one. By rights, I should also be closing this thread. Still, I'll permit this paper to be examined for a while (probably _not_ the full 30 days, but we'll see) so long as the discussion stays _very_ focused on the paper in question.
Fourth: If you have something to ask or dispute, you do it via PM or the reports mechanism, never in thread. This, also, you know.
If you have any other questions or concerns, PM or report. Do not create more of a fuss in thread.