Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 61 to 65 of 65

Thread: Missing: One Hypersonic Glider (again?)

  1. #61
    Join Date
    Sep 2008

    With a smaller version. Mach 5-8, 4000km, hit the target.

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Near Grover's Mill
    "There's a demon out there at Mach 1 between Mach 6 and Mach 20."
    I may have many faults, but being wrong ain't one of them. - Jimmy Hoffa

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Quote Originally Posted by slang View Post
    Remember that when the ICBM was introduced, the thinking was that bombers would no longer be necessary.
    That has more validity than you might imagine. The very reason Khrushchev support missile development was to avoid having to compete blow-per-blow with the US force projection infrastructure left after WWII. Later, he was removed and they tried a carrier, kept looking for a B-52 equivalent, and went broke.

    Even here, people are questioning the use of Carriers

    With Iran very far from Israel, the Jericho missile looks to be an option. Stand-off weapons are really becoming more and more of a reality, and cheaper than operating many bases. What I want folks to help me understand is this: Why so much focus on some of the hypersonic airbreathing concepts eleswhere? I seem to remember an op-ed where folks praised the all solid skybolt over any of the new wave hypersonic missile concepts. All I have heard in the way of chatter was that Skybolt was TOO good.

  4. #64
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Quote Originally Posted by ravens_cry View Post
    Yes, that's why we had Apollo 12 visiting Surveyor III.
    When we send a manned mission to Mars, we can take a look around some of our earlier probes, maybe even bring some of them home.
    They deserve it.
    I know it seems silly to give anthromorphic traits to our robots, but I don't know of anyone who was a "fan" of the rovers who didn't do it. The comic is actually kind of sad.

    And yes, they do deserve it.

  5. #65
    Join Date
    May 2005

    Probable cause of the failure has been released.

    Skin-peeling speed doomed hypersonic glider, U.S. says
    "The most probable cause of the HTV-2 Flight 2 premature flight termination was unexpected aeroshell degradation," the research group explained in a new statement on the test flight.

    Translation: The unmanned glider was streaking through the atmosphere when its outer skin started to rip off the airframe.

    I got a chuckle at this comment:
    DARPA knew friction from the glider passing through the air so fast would cause it to heat up.
    Considering that's a given in aerodynamics, I would hope they know.

Similar Threads

  1. Energy Equlibriaum Question: Glider on a Balloon
    By ravens_cry in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-30, 08:44 PM
  2. Missing: One Hypersonic Glider
    By 01101001 in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2010-May-10, 12:17 AM
  3. Hypersonic aircraft
    By Paul Leeks in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 2008-Jun-18, 02:09 PM
  4. X-43A Goes Hypersonic
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-11, 06:31 AM
  5. Discussion: X-43a Goes Hypersonic
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2004-Apr-02, 05:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The forum is sponsored in-part by: