Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Why dark matter does not emit photon?

Threaded View

  1. #1

    Why dark matter does not emit photon?

    Hello
    I’m sorry. I can’t English well. My native language is not English....


    We are now living in the era of new revolution.
    Are we again treading on the process of huge revolution that occurred in the late 19th century and the early 20th century?

    The current observation of dark matter requires explanation on two important situations as the following.

    Situation 1: Denial of the gravitational (attractive) phenomenon
    Dark matter is five times more than the general matter, but it does not show macro-structure like the structure of galaxy or galaxy cluster, or micro-structure like fixed star or planet. The result of the current observation is that dark matter has attractive interaction with the general matter, but does not interact with the other dark matter. In other words, the observation or interpretation is that dark matters do not exert gravity(attraction) on each other.

    Situation 2: Denial of the fundamental phenomenon of physics that absorbs or emits photons
    It is not the level that dark matter has not interacts electromagnetically because it is electrically neutral, but the observation result is the level that dark matter does not emits or absorbs photons.

    From the several explanations above(refer to my old thread or my paper), Situation 1 shows that the essence of dark matter is negative mass, and that consequently they have the repulsive gravitational effect, so it can be explained.

    In regard to Situation 2, without giving that kind of characteristics of “the observation result that seems to be that it does not emit or absorb photons” from the first, can this kind of result be induced from other basic principle?


    A. Negative mass is stable at the state of high energy.



    Fig1. ,
    ,(). The acceleration of negative mass is opposite of the direction of force, and in case of negative mass, it does harmonic oscillation at the maximum point and is stable at the maximum point.

    B. The problem of transition from positive energy level to negative energy level
    Since we do not know clearly about the characteristics of negative mass yet, we do not know whether transition of positive mass at the positive energy level to negative energy level is possible or not.



    Fig2. Transition to the negative energy level

    However, for positive mass to enter the area of negative energy level, energy should have the negative value, and this means that it should have the characteristics of the negative mass.
    When considering the process of entering the domain of negative energy level from positive energy level, it must pass through the domain between 0 and . In case it follows the laws of negative mass because it's in the domain of negative energy, it cannot reach ,which is the first energy level of negative, because it is stable at the state of high energy, and it tries to have higher value of energy. It is because the energy level is much higher than the energy level . That is to say that it shows possibility that the law of negative mass itself does not allow the situation where positive mass at the positive energy level succeed to the negative energy level.

    Even if it reaches , the first energy level, at the negative energy level, it must follow the law of negative mass, it is stable at the state of high energy, and thus “the problem of the transition of the energy level of minus infinity” does not occur.

    As we have examined above, “the problem of the transition of the energy level of minus infinity” does not occur, and thus positive mass and negative mass can exist in the same spacetime. This is a very important result because it means that negative mass and negative energy can exist stably in our universe.

    (This finding suggests that “the problem of the transition of the energy level of minus infinity”, which we have had for eighty years regardless of whether negative mass exists or not, does not occur, and it itself has important meaning. Thus, it needs to be reflected in the teachings that are being performed when explaining the solution to negative energy, which the relativistic energy eq. suggests.)


    In regard to Situation 2, without giving that kind of characteristics of “the observation result that seems to be that it does not emit or absorb photons” from the first, can this kind of result be induced from other basic principle?

    Now, to think about this problem,

    C. Why dark matter does not emit photon?
    1) The process of negative mass emitting photon

    : Initial energy of negative mass,
    : Energy of photon

    The relational expression above means that if negative mass emits photon(with positive energy), then the energy after emitting gets lower than the energy before emitting.

    Negative mass is stable at the state of high energy, so the voluntary transition that negative mass emits photon and succeeds to the lower energy level does not exist. Therefore, negative mass explains the result of the current observation that dark matter does not emit photon from the fundamental principle.

    2) The process of negative mass absorbing photon
    Based on the inference so far, I think that there exists a process of negative mass absorbing photon.



    If negative mass absorbs photon, then it means that the energy after the absorption gets increased more than the energy before the absorption.

    However, since negative mass is usually distributed outside the galactic system, it does not interrupt path of light from a star in galaxy at all. Since it is distributed almost equally throughout the entire universe due to its repulsive characteristic as negative mass, it is deemed that instances of colliding with photon from other outside galaxy or absorbing photon are not many.

    Also, if negative mass is reached a stable state, after moving for a long time to become stable, then it is assumed that the process of absorbing photon will occur under limited conditions as well.

    All kinds of restricting conditions (conservation conditions) exist in the process of becoming positive mass or succeeding to higher energy level because negative mass absorbed positive energy, then absorption of photon can be highly limited due to these kinds of restricting conditions.

    * The explanation on why dark matter does not emit photon is enough with this. In my paper, more various situations are set-up.

    ---Icarus2

    Negative Mass is Stable at the State of High Energy
    http://vixra.org/abs/1107.0052
    Last edited by icarus2; 2011-Jul-28 at 03:58 PM. Reason: typo

Similar Threads

  1. Anti-Matter, Dark-Matter, Missing Matter
    By transreality in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2011-Mar-11, 09:32 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2010-Nov-17, 06:24 PM
  3. When does a photon turn into matter?
    By robross in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 2009-Aug-01, 08:40 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2009-Apr-23, 04:04 AM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2008-Aug-27, 06:00 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
here
The forum is sponsored in-part by: