Results 1 to 26 of 26

Thread: Why have the fx on Dr. Who changed?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,443

    Why have the fx on Dr. Who changed?

    Why have the fx on Dr. Who changed? They actually seem pretty good and wasn't the fact that they weren't all that good part of the show's charm?

  2. #2
    Part of it I think is that you have to appeal to new fans who did know Doctor Who in the past but grew up with better fx since the series went off in the 80's.

  3. #3
    Better fx are more affordable now.
    Especially CGI are at the very nearly dirt cheap end now.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  4. #4
    They were terrible and the show suffered because of it. Those that say it's part of the charm are I think deluding themselves.
    If the same budget and FX had been available for the classic Pertwee and Tom Baker years it would have been a far better show.
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,227
    The FX had charm, not because they were bad, but because the production teams were doing their utmost to create whole worlds on very limited budgets. It was this heroic element that did so much to win the show so many fans.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    I remember someone who was complaining about the special effects in Star Wars. I mean the original movie, not the altered version. I've also heard complaints about the best FX movies out of the '50s, simply because they aren't what modern audiences expect. So it isn't even about how good it was when it was done, it is also because people today have very different expectations.

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    145
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
    The FX had charm, not because they were bad, but because the production teams were doing their utmost to create whole worlds on very limited budgets. It was this heroic element that did so much to win the show so many fans.
    Quite right.
    The walls of the Tardis wobbling when someone bumped into them... inexcusable.
    Green-painted bubble-wrap monster... resourceful.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    3,359
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
    The FX had charm, not because they were bad, but because the production teams were doing their utmost to create whole worlds on very limited budgets. It was this heroic element that did so much to win the show so many fans.
    Whilst I can't argue with your sentiment, I think there's a cause and effect problem. I think we loved the shows as children despite the poor special effects and then as we grew older, we appreciated the ingenuity that turned bubble wrap, old Airfix kits and papier mache into aliens and spacecraft. I think the "charm" element only hits as we get older.

    I for one recall reaching an age (13) when i thought "hang on! this is like Crossroads in space" and stopped watching, only to return at a less cynical age (28 IIRC).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Clear Lake City, TX
    Posts
    8,872
    Quote Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
    ... If the same budget and FX had been available for the classic Pertwee and Tom Baker years it would have been a far better show.
    The only special FX those two needed was provided by Elisabeth Ann Sladen.
    Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity.
    Isaac Asimov

    Moderation will be in purple.
    Rules for Posting to This Board

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Depew, NY
    Posts
    4,827
    I chuckle because Monty Python and The Holy Grail came out in the same year as Star Wars.
    One is much funnier than the other, in part due to the lack of FX funds.
    Solfe

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    'That was tops! Who's not good at math? I was all, "Four!"' - Finn, Adventure Time.

  11. #11
    I know Star Wars was funnier but it wasn't due to special effects.

  12. #12
    I've seen the argument that the reason why so much of modern sci-fi sucks is that in the old days, the fx required the audience to engage suspension of disbelief earlier, which meant that silly plots and 2d characters were overlooked, while with modern fx there's no need to engage it so those other short-comings are blatantly obvious to critical minds.
    __________________________________________________
    Reductionist and proud of it.

    Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn. Benjamin Franklin
    Chase after the truth like all hell and you'll free yourself, even though you never touch its coat tails. Clarence Darrow
    A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read. Mark Twain

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,515
    Quote Originally Posted by banquo's_bumble_puppy View Post
    Why have the fx on Dr. Who changed?
    You can do things faster, better and far cheaper now on computers than building models and costumes.

    For example, Blender is free....

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,835
    Back in the early seventies, I really wanted Who to become a sweeping space opera, with all the different races thrown together in galactic conflict. Instead of the claustrophobic stories set in tunnels and corridors we were used to, I wanted to see big special effects, space battles and aliens fighting each other, with shifting loyalties and intrigue. The extensive, implied galactic history that the series already contained could have been used to produce epic stories. The closest to this we got at the time was The Curse of Peladon...

    But the new series, especially the recent attack on Demon's Run, fulfils my dreams of how the series should have been, back then. Television simply didn't have the technology to create epic stories and special effects like that in those days; now it does.

  15. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by amensae View Post
    Green-painted bubble-wrap monster... resourceful.
    'Ark in Space' ? one of my fave stories
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  16. #16
    Maybe someone needs to go back and do what they did with TOS and apply some careful computer enhancements to the FX
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,227
    Quote Originally Posted by eburacum45 View Post
    I wanted to see big special effects, space battles and aliens fighting each other, with shifting loyalties and intrigue... The closest to this we got at the time was The Curse of Peladon...
    Frontier In Space/Planet of the Daleks.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,703
    Quote Originally Posted by amensae View Post
    The walls of the Tardis wobbling when someone bumped into them... inexcusable.
    Superfan (and therefore total geek) Toby Hadoke claims to have watched every single classic episode looking for instances of the sets wobbling. Despite the show's reputation, he says he found just one.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,703
    Quote Originally Posted by captain swoop View Post
    Maybe someone needs to go back and do what they did with TOS and apply some careful computer enhancements to the FX
    That's been done with some of the DVDs - "Ark in Space," "Time Warrior," and "The Five Doctors", at least. (The only ones I can verify firsthand.) They're on option on the first two, fixed on the latter - and, sadly, it's the latter changes that are much less of an improvement than the others.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  20. #20
    It would have to be done well and subtle like in Star Trek, it seems to be mainly model shots etc that they have improved.
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,227
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek View Post
    That's been done with some of the DVDs - "Ark in Space," "Time Warrior," and "The Five Doctors", at least. (The only ones I can verify firsthand.) They're on option on the first two, fixed on the latter - and, sadly, it's the latter changes that are much less of an improvement than the others.
    It's also an option on The Dalek Invasion of Earth. The Dalek saucer can either be a hubcap or the detailed spacecraft inspired by the TV Century 21 comic strip.

    Incidentally, this comic strip was an early demonstration of the scope of the storytelling. It begins with a completely different Genesis, in which the original Daleks are stunted, blue-skinned people (not called Kaleds), and the inventor of the war/travel machines is called Yarvelling (not Davros, and he doesn't have a bathchair), assisted by war chief Zolfian. Skaro, the Dalek planet, is thoroughly explored, and we see the history of the Daleks unfold as they develop spaceflight (unwittingly aided by a bunch of visiting slavers). Most of the time we are invited to root for the Daleks as they heroically fight off invaders, or the rightful emperor is challenged by an upstart. Meanwhile the Daleks invade other planets, employing Machiavellian tactics to divide and conquer. They get involved in a space war with the almost-remembered Mechanoids, and a robot spy is sent in to prevent the war from spilling out onto neighbouring worlds. And centuries after the death of Yarvelling and Zolfian, thought to be the last of the humanoid Daleks, three surviving humanoids emerge from suspended animation, an event which leads to the discovery of the planet Earth, which they set out to invade. We all know how that turns out...

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    9,227
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Beardsley View Post
    Frontier In Space/Planet of the Daleks.
    Oh, and prior to that, if you don't mind listening to audio CDs, there's The Dalek Masterplan.

    In fact I strongly recommend listening to the following adventures on CD:

    Galaxy 4 - an actually quite poor adventure set on a doomed planet, but the unrelated teaser at the end is a taster of...

    Mission to the Unknown - a standalone episode (included in the Masterplan CD set) which does not feature the Doctor or his companions, but does feature more than one life form that comes from Skaro. Bewilderingly, this leads into...

    The Myth Makers - a Blackadderesque take on The Iliad and The Odyssey, which features the TARDIS regulars, but not the Daleks. Very funny for three episodes (happily the humour is almost all dialogue so the loss of visuals doesn't matter) then turns quite nasty in the final episode. The TARDIS crew are quite unprepared for...

    The Dalek Masterplan - a 12-part epic set on a succession of worlds with alliances, betrayals, Daleks getting great lines, a cricket scene that Douglas Adams would later plagiarise, a reunion with a very untrustworthy old friend, and an apocalyptic ending. And unlike in recent stories, when the Doctor's companions die, they stay dead...

    The Massacre of St Bartholomew's Eve - an excellent, excellent historical set in 16th century Paris which serves almost as a coda to the traumatic events of the last few episodes... except that it proves pretty traumatic itself. The surviving TARDIS crew are profoundly affected by events, but do not themselves have much effect, which in itself is the cause of some tension. The penultimate scene is one of the most poignant in the show's history.

    Before and after this long stretch of episodes, there are several pretty good stories available on video or DVD. But you can't beat the joy of soundtrack-with-narration.

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    7,835
    I remember the Dalek Masterplan (and the TV21 comic) when I was a kid, and I wanted more cosmic adventure like that. Mavic Chen is an amazing creation. But when the Seventies and the Pertwee era arrived, the series was fixed to Earth-bound stories that were interesting, but hardly galactic. Later stories seemed to retain that claustrophobic feel, even when set on Gallifrey or in another universe. When Christopher Eccleston showed Rose a spectacular end of the Earth and half-a-dozen far-future alien, and human-derived, species I thought 'now this is more like it'.

  24. #24
    I used to get TV21. great comic.
    Rules For Posting To This Board
    All Moderation in Purple

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,592
    I feel obliged to defend the show here.

    1: Poor special effects were not 'part of the charm'. They did what they could on the budget they had. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. At least they tried.

    2: Many of the visual effects on Doctor Who were cutting edge, believe it or not. Look for some great inlay shots in the early black and white stories (the scene with the Doctor, Ian, Barbara and Susan looking out over the Dalek city, for instance). Scene synch (basically movingCSO shots) was first tried on Who. The use of Quantel in Nightmare of Eden, though it looks dated now, was incredible in 1979.

    3: Even now, Doctor Who has its share of poor effects.

    4: All those who compare a BBC TV show with a multi-million dollar movie are rather missing the point that one had the money for the great visuals and one did not.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,703
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason Thompson View Post
    I feel obliged to defend the show here.

    1: Poor special effects were not 'part of the charm'. They did what they could on the budget they had. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. At least they tried.
    I go along with what Paul said above: it's not the poor effects but the amazing results they got on the cheap, making hand puppets scary and green bubble-wrap totally gross.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

Similar Threads

  1. How thing have changed since 68
    By Starvoyager in forum Astronomical Observing, Equipment and Accessories
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2008-Apr-10, 06:29 PM
  2. The map that changed the world
    By ToSeek in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-Oct-31, 06:21 PM
  3. Spacecraft - How Often Is Course Changed?
    By taurus26 in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-06, 05:07 AM
  4. Has the color of the Sun changed?
    By The Saint in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2005-Aug-27, 06:58 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •