http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41927089...science-space/
At first I thought it was Betelgeuse, but then this article says it is a "rare optical illusion."
So a question, has Betelgeuse exploded? If so, is that it on the picture?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41927089...science-space/
At first I thought it was Betelgeuse, but then this article says it is a "rare optical illusion."
So a question, has Betelgeuse exploded? If so, is that it on the picture?
Betelgeuse has not exploded. I saw it last night.
From the article:
That's weird. The still from the video shows the two "suns" side-by-side--since the sun is only a half degree wide, the offset would be a half degree (left side of sun has moved over the full width of the sun, or vice versa) not 3 and a half degrees."The case of a mock sun 3 degrees and 25 arc-seconds to the left of the nearly set sun sounds incredible but has been recorded photographically." Indeed, Minnaert's description sounds nearly identical to the scene in question.
I'm rather skeptical about this video, by the way. Double suns have been reported very occasionally in the past, and if authentic this would be the first good image I've ever seen.
Here's a thread on Bautforum about a double moon.
http://www.bautforum.com/showthread....crescent-moon?
and also this link
http://www.science-frontiers.com/sf068/sf068g14.htm
But before accepting this as a rare photo of that phenomenon it would be nice to have more information. Camera trickery is so commonplace these days.
Order of Kilopi
I can accept this (although not blindly), there was a good description of a valid phenomenon, and mention of some optics that don't fit.
But; it would be nice to have better images. BTW, there's no link to a video yet, so I found one on youtube here (720p).
I do have to give credit to MSNBC in this case. They didn't have the "opposing side" where some woo scientist is interviewed with a lead in of "some scientists disagree". I wonder what the Chinese broadcast was saying.
There's a video of the Chinese Broadcast with translations in the description. I'll try to find it.