Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: question about space as kind of fuel..

  1. #1

    question about space as kind of fuel..

    ok i will try to ask my question ,hope it will be understanding since i am trying to bring new idea,and this is not so easy for understanding..

    and my question is:
    if object is staying at space on point let say x,can the point change the state,not the object,if the object is in very very high extream temperature such as biggest sun that alaw them even to use this space as a kind of fuel.

    *sorry for my english,but i am realy try..so dont be hard with me...lol

    cohen avshalom charly
    israel/haifa
    icarus5

  2. #2
    and hope this time i will make some speak with you,even that this is not some time hard for me..so let see what you can say.and please say somethings/
    icarus5

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
    Posts
    4,024
    Quote Originally Posted by icarus5 View Post
    and hope this time i will make some speak with you,even that this is not some time hard for me..so let see what you can say.and please say somethings/
    icarus5
    I don't understand the question. Are you asking whether or not a hot object can somehow extract energy from what appears to be empty space, and use it for propulsion?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    18,998
    Quote Originally Posted by icarus5 View Post
    ... if object is staying at space on point let say x,can the point change the state,not the object,if the object is in very very high extream temperature such as biggest sun that alaw them even to use this space as a kind of fuel. ...
    What you are asking about it an idea outside of established physics. When we know more about the nature of space itself better (something that may come from String Theory, or whatever theory finally gets worked out filling that niche in science), we might be able to answer with more certainty, but that day may be centuries from now.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  5. #5
    ok i speak a bout some differant kinds of area(space),such one kind is what i am calling as a format area (the area as what we are knwoing today as reglure space),and other kind is what i am calling not format area(those area i mean could been at area such as at the edge of the known universe and after that,but those area could not fullfill material,since they had not got process of format -->the area that will allow the area to consist material).

    icarus5
    *thanks for anser me/
    Last edited by icarus5; 2011-Feb-01 at 01:33 PM. Reason: ok

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    2,988
    I don't understand either. Try again using different words. The edge of the known universe is about 13.7 billion lightyears away, so we would have to wait 13.7 billion years to get energy from the biggest sun there.
    If the temperature is over about 3500 degrees c all known materials boil, so we can't support the magnets that produce the magnetic bottle for fusion, unless the fusion generator has dimensions of almost a light year for the biggest sun thought to be possible.
    Your spot X is stationary with respect to something, perhaps Earth's surface or Centauri A Neil

  7. #7
    I think the question is, can you burn space itself if you have a high enough temperature?

    I think the answer is clearly no. Space itself is not something that can burn. It's like asking if you can burn time.
    As above, so below

  8. #8
    I dunno, I find myself burning plenty of time on the internet. :-)

    I wonder if dark energy could ever be utilised as an energy source, being that it accounts for what, 70% of the universe's total energy? If not that, maybe all these virtual particles that are popping up everywhere? Or what about all these cosmic rays and neutrinos that are passing through the planet every moment of every second? There's a lot of stuff right under our noses.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    11,219
    Hello, icarus5!

    Are you using the word "format" to mean like the part of a
    computer disk which is formatted, as compared to the blank
    part which is not formatted? If that is not what you meant,
    I do not understand what you meant.

    -- Jeff, in Minneapolis
    http://www.FreeMars.org/jeff/

    "I find astronomy very interesting, but I wouldn't if I thought we
    were just going to sit here and look." -- "Van Rijn"

    "The other planets? Well, they just happen to be there, but the
    point of rockets is to explore them!" -- Kai Yeves

  10. #10
    yes jeff i mean format area ,at the same way as the computer term ,and i say that area that has'nt go on such kind of process ,could not hold any material ,and i say also that if the universe has size let say x,at the edge you have a point -->when those 2 kind of area(the format area-and the not format area are meating),on those point you are getting by mix this 2 kind of space ,you get new enrgey by mixxing those to kind of area.
    if you will look at picture on the cmr you will not see homogeneous picture or uniform temperature,else you will see like many point(diffrent temperature,that very close to 0 K),this is show that the mixxing of the 2 kind of area ->is also a process,that combine 2 kind of space.
    and jens ,you right i say that iron /copper/ash-and all materiual change state at X temperature(this dependent of any material temerature),and at very high temerature also the spaec( that i call format space) are also are bornnig(but the result is not heat else magnetic ray),i also thinks that area that have super nova process are using space area formated as last reserve of fuel.and by this lost his space,that he can hold.
    *last thinks at the edge of the universe(i thinks i mean after the universe) you dont have big sun(of course),else by my point of view you have area of space that i call not format area,and this area are not holding not material of energy(at list till they over process of formatting,and by this enter new enregy to the universe.
    *last thinks i thinks the universe had began with complete zero M or E.
    cohen avhslao, charly
    icarus5

  11. #11
    ok and of course i forget to say that i look on the universe not as a close model,else as an open universe model.
    icarus5

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    18,998
    Quote Originally Posted by icarus5 View Post
    ... on those point you are getting by mix this 2 kind of space ,you get new enrgey by mixxing those to kind of area. ...
    Hi icarus5,
    As I said before, what you are asking about is outside the area of known physics. So far as I know there is nothing in known physics to indicate that what you are discussing has any possibility of working. If you would like to compose more carefully a statement of what you mean, feel free to post it in the Against The Mainstream section of this forum. ... though I'm pretty sure that the lack of testability will result in few comments.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  13. #13
    that ok,i thinks i present my opinion,and yes this is of course new idea ,but after you will thinks about this in the four or five time ,you may take some of my idea as possible,even that this is against the mainstream still that why we have forum,and this is to present ideas ,and what people have on there head.
    cohen avshalom charly
    israel/haifa
    icarus5

  14. #14
    and sorry i forget i dont hide after the string theory,but yes i have probleam to explain terms as diffrent between space that hold the M and the E,and in the other way the E and the M-that can move ,people use to mix them toghter.(since this is hard to understand the diffrent betweeen those part.
    icarus5
    Last edited by icarus5; 2011-Feb-02 at 06:20 PM. Reason: ok

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,289
    Quote Originally Posted by icarus5 View Post
    that ok,i thinks i present my opinion,and yes this is of course new idea ,but after you will thinks about this in the four or five time ,you may take some of my idea as possible,even that this is against the mainstream still that why we have forum,and this is to present ideas ,and what people have on there head.
    cohen avshalom charly
    israel/haifa
    icarus5
    That may be one reason for BAUT, but it is not the reason for Q&A. If you wish to continue to discuss your idea, start an ATM thread. This thread is closed.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

Similar Threads

  1. Noob question DSLR or some kind of CCD?
    By ATAIM in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2009-Jun-15, 05:11 PM
  2. Shuttle Fuel Tank Question
    By Drbuzz0 in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2007-Feb-12, 08:32 PM
  3. Kind of embarrassing question about long term relationships
    By banquo's_bumble_puppy in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 2006-Nov-12, 04:43 PM
  4. Quick fuel cell question
    By DaveDauria in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 2006-May-22, 06:22 PM
  5. Kind-of-Physics Question
    By porky26030 in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 2003-Dec-31, 12:50 AM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •