Page 6 of 11 FirstFirst ... 45678 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 180 of 330

Thread: SpaceX COTS-2/3 Flight

  1. #151
    Damn that's really too bad, but I guess it could have been worse.

    Now when can they launch again?

  2. #152
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,211
    So close....

  3. #153
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    379
    Next launch window is Tuesday, the 22nd, 7:44 UTC.

    Ugh, another hour earlier for us Europeans.

  4. #154
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,801
    No.
    No!
    No.

  5. #155
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,389
    Chamber overpressure in engine 5(?) caused the abort, at least that's what one of the controllers said.

    Sorry there was no launch, Gemini, hope you can stay 3 days for the next attempt.
    ____________
    "Dumb all over, a little ugly on the side." -- Frank Zappa
    "Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
    "This is really very simple, but unfortunately it's very complicated." -- publius

    Moderator comments in this color | Get moderator attention using the lower left icon:
    Recommended reading: Board Rules * Forum FAQs * Conspiracy Theory Advice * Alternate Theory Advocates Advice

  6. #156
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    16,659
    Well, that was disappointing, but it could have been a lot worse (the rocket is still intact).

    I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. How do you prove that I am wrong?

    The Leif Ericson Cruiser

  7. #157
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,801
    Quote Originally Posted by Van Rijn View Post
    Well, that was disappointing, but it could have been a lot worse (the rocket is still intact).
    True, better than pulling a Vanguard.

  8. #158
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    In the neighborhood of Grover's Mill
    Posts
    2,244
    So, can we restart the debate over whether it is better to have more smaller engines or fewer bigger engines?

  9. #159
    Quote Originally Posted by Extravoice View Post
    So, can we restart the debate over whether it is better to have more smaller engines or fewer bigger engines?
    We could, but why? It's not a black and white situation. Some multi-engined vehicles have historically been lost when an engine failed, but some others managed to recover from the failure/underperformance.

    On the other hand, when your only engine gives out the end result is clear.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1XE_awXEA4
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkSVRanIj3A

    Personally, I think 9 engines is a bit too many. I kind of like Proton's 6 and Saturn V's 5 engine count.

  10. #160
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    7,182
    A quote from the article below: "This is not a failure," Shotwell said. "We aborted with purpose. It would have been a failure if we had lifted off with an engine trending in this direction."

    http://www.space.com/15769-spacex-pr...nch-abort.html
    http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...8918.msg900248
    http://www.space-travel.com/reports/...o_ISS_999.html
    http://www.space.com/15739-top-promi...pacecraft.html

    On the pressure to downselect:
    http://www.space-travel.com/reports/..._race_999.html

  11. #161
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,256
    I'm glad the computer detected the problem, rather than them having launched with it undetected and possibly having the rocket crash or explode. I am, however, slightly disappointed that I won't be able to watch with my family because I'll be at my internship in DC after tomorrow.

  12. #162
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    4,892
    Very often an abort at this stage of the launch is sensor related. A bad sensor - especially if it is just a connection or a limit that was set too tight - and the Tuesday window might be reachable. An over-pressure due to an unexpected chamber condition is usually much more serious - Not only does a problem need to be identified and a correction found, the correction must go through a verification process and would likely need to be applied to all motors.

  13. #163
    Elon tweeted earlier

    "Engine pressure anomaly traced to turbopump valve. Replacing on engine 5 and verifying no common mode. #DragonLaunch"

  14. #164
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,780
    Quote Originally Posted by djellison View Post
    Elon tweeted earlier

    "Engine pressure anomaly traced to turbopump valve. Replacing on engine 5 and verifying no common mode. #DragonLaunch"
    Good they've been able to track it down quickly so the 22nd remains a possibility then.

  15. #165
    As long as it is just a valve that can be replaces and not the whole engine, they can launch on 22nd.

    And they better do launch.

  16. #166
    Quote Originally Posted by Warringer View Post
    And they better do launch.
    ... or else, what?

  17. #167
    was that a threat, or?

  18. #168
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    3,801
    Dat's a nice rocket you got dere, itta be a shame if something happened to it like.

  19. #169
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    10,342
    It's STS 41-D all over again.

  20. #170
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    In the neighborhood of Grover's Mill
    Posts
    2,244
    The last time I said "Why don't they just launch the thing?" was January 28, 1986.

    Since that time, I've been a lot more forgiving of delays.

  21. #171
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    9,389
    Quote Originally Posted by ugordan View Post
    ... or else, what?
    Or else we shall be very cross with them! Unless they postpone to a launch window when I'm not at work.
    ____________
    "Dumb all over, a little ugly on the side." -- Frank Zappa
    "Your right to hold an opinion is not being contested. Your expectation that it be taken seriously is." -- Jason Thompson
    "This is really very simple, but unfortunately it's very complicated." -- publius

    Moderator comments in this color | Get moderator attention using the lower left icon:
    Recommended reading: Board Rules * Forum FAQs * Conspiracy Theory Advice * Alternate Theory Advocates Advice

  22. #172
    Quote Originally Posted by ugordan View Post
    ... or else, what?
    I will fall to thr ground and start to cry. You do not want to see a grown man cry!

  23. #173
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    3,154
    NASA and the Air Force have approved Tuesday's launch at 3:44 EST.

  24. #174
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Glom View Post
    It's STS 41-D all over again.
    "I thought MECO was going to be a lot higher than that."

  25. #175
    That was breathtaking. Dragon is on orbit - solar arrays deployed - all is well.

    I'm not sure what it'll take to silence the commercial space naysayers - but I'm fairly sure it looks like that.

    Amazing. Just amazing.

  26. #176
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,680
    Beautiful Flight! Congrats SPACEX team!

  27. #177
    It was a really pretty launch from Stuart Florida, about 120 miles south. WELL DONE SpaceX! And I'll second what dj said about the naysayers.

  28. #178
    Boy! That pitch-over surely had me holding my breath. Was not expecting that. I thought it had gone errant.

  29. #179
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Northwest Washington State
    Posts
    1,720
    Nice launch!

  30. #180
    What a beautiful launch. I can't wait to see how the coming days play out.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2011-Sep-18, 11:00 PM
  2. SpaceX COTS-1 Flight Preparations
    By Larry Jacks in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 150
    Last Post: 2011-Jan-05, 06:27 PM
  3. More Images, Details on SpaceX’s Dragon Flight
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Dec-16, 02:40 PM
  4. The Future is Now: SpaceX Flight 100% Successful
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Dec-08, 11:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •