Arp 304 consists of two galaxies NGC 1241 and NGC 1242, right to left and a double star to the southeast, NGC 1243. The two galaxies were first seen by William Herschel. John Herschel, unable to see 1242 recorded the double star. Dreyer saw all three but recorded the double star as a nebula. It seems odd that even with a 72" scope (speculum mirror I assume) he couldn't recognize 2 14th magnitude stars 12" apart. The NGC is full of such mistakes, some single stars.
The pair is about 175 to 178 million light years distant in the constellation of Eridanus. Arp put them in his catalog under double galaxies with filaments. I suppose that is the northward arm of NGC 1241. While red shift puts them at about the same distance there's some question about whether they are interacting or not. One note at NED says no, another yes and another wanted more data. NED classes NGC 1241 as SB(rs)b Sy2, NGC 1242 as SB(rs)c:. NGC 1241 does have that odd arm and NGC 1242 seems odd with that very blue northern arm and one heavy arm. So I vote for the interaction being possible. Still there are no real plumes which is likely why others say no interaction.
The field is out of the Sloan Survey coverage. Only one other galaxy in my field has a known red shift. To find it look well east (left) and a bit south (down) of Arp 304. It is the largest red round galaxy. Further east is a close rather bright double star with a blue galaxy above it. The red one is 2MASX J03121399-0858394 at 1.3 billion light years. The blue one is APMUKS(BJ) B030959.78-090917.2. Other than it being magnitude 18.15 there's no data on it or any other galaxy in the image.
But there is one asteroid 2005 LZ45 at magnitude 19.8 shows up as a short streak angling slightly upward west of the bottom end of NGC 1241. It is at the edge of the 150% crop image above a slightly orange star that's the first up from the bottom right corner of the cropped image.
This is my last November image (maybe not -- I just found another lost on the hard drive but with weak maybe unusable green data). Now I can move to December. December was mostly cloudy. Only one clear night and it lasted only half the night so only 3 images for that month (well 4, as I found a lost one there too with weak color data that I may be able to salvage). Soon I'll be processing 2010 images!
14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10'x3, STL-11000XM, Paramount ME