What is the Universe?

[TheUFOPilot]

Hello, I wondered about all matter particles and the fermions they are made of,and how Higgs thinks they can only exist in his field of vacuum magic. Think about a concept of neutral universal matter, its the stuff between matter we can see. Now if matter generates energy or EMF's and matter is just energy in another form it wuld make sense that matter could be created by energy, like some perpetual engine, which would explain the growth of the Universe.If space itself is simply neutral matter, where fermions are energized into existance by electro magnetic frequncies and with the decay theory, it could limit the shelf life of these fermion particles, they are virtual for a limited time or until they find another particle by magnetic attraction, due to a stronger or weaker electro magnetic energy signature, or mass and then combine creating a true particle with mass thus creating matter we can detect. Thanks for reading and comments of none abuse are welcome..lol

[Fortis]

UFO Pilot, do you know why the Higgs field was postulated?

[Swift]

TheUFOPilot,

First, welcome to BAUT.

Second, I have deleted your duplicate thread in Science & Technology. The ATM (Against the Mainstream) forum is the place for this discussion.

Third, I strongly suggest that you review the rules of the board, particularly rule 13, and the first post of the advice for ATM supporters. You need to know that there are specific rules for the ATM forum that require you to defend your ideas, offer evidence for them, and to answer questions about them (such as Fortis'). If you are not prepared to do so, that is fine, just say so, but this thread will be closed.

[caveman1917]

Now if matter generates energy or EMF's

Why do you think matter generates energy?

[forrest noble]

TheUFOPILOT,

Welcome to your third posting on BAUT. I know this thread was transferred from the Science and Technology section but Looking at your thread you might wish to change the wording and transfer it into a "what if" question and request that it be put into the Question & Answer section. There you could ask whatever "what if" questions you wish, but you can't make statements or assertions that are not based upon mainstream ideas. You can always request a thread be moved, and moderation will do so if your request is appropriate.

........would make sense that matter could be created by energy

Of course there are cases where matter is created by energy, i.e. apposing gamma ray beams can produce an electron and positron. The E=Mc2 equations, etc. This is not ATM.

....If space itself is simply neutral matter, where fermions are energized into existence by electro magnetic frequencies and with the decay theory, it could limit the shelf life of these fermion particles, they are virtual for a limited time or until they find another particle by magnetic attraction, due to a stronger or weaker electro magnetic energy signature, or mass and then combine creating a true particle with mass thus creating matter we can detect....

This statement is more supposition than an ATM statement. Suppose this or that, or using the word "could," might or maybe, are not really statements, they are supposition, speculation, or query.

..... if matter generates energy or EMF's and matter is just energy in another form it would make sense that matter could be created by energy, like some perpetual engine, which would explain the growth of the Universe.

This is a weak ATM statement which you made. By using the word "would" instead or "could" you made it ATM where with "could" it would have been just speculation.

Is this the ATM statement that you would like to defend? paraphrased: that since matter is just another form of energy which continues to generate even more energy, then this would explain the growth of the universe.

Did I state this properly or do you wish to rephrase it, or change it? ----Or is another of your suppositional statements the basis of your idea(s), or some combination or total?

[Sir Knots A Lot]

Now if matter generates energy or EMF's

Generates is a funny word. The alignment of the atoms within a ferromagnetic generates an EMF, but the energy of this field comes from the properties of this alignment.

matter is just energy in another form it wuld make sense that matter could be created by energy

As has been shown with laser electron interactions in particle acclerators, energy can be converted into matter in the form of pair production, creating a 'pair plasma.'

like some perpetual engine

Taken as a individual pieces, atoms themselves are little perpetual motion machines. The property of spin implies that every everything at the quantum level is constantly in motion. But they're like cogs in the greater machine, which may or may not be in a state of perpetual motion.

it could limit the shelf life of these fermion particles, they are virtual for a limited time or until they find another particle by magnetic attraction, due to a stronger or weaker electro magnetic energy signature, or mass and then combine creating a true particle with mass thus creating matter we can detect

Dirac (1930a), Oppenheimer (1930), and Heisenberg (1931)
had all shown that every charged particle can give rise to
unlimited numbers of electron-positron pairs and their associated
photons, pulled up from the “sea” by the charge, making
every interaction an infinite-body problem. Moreover, this
“polarization of the vacuum,” apparent in measurements even
then, has since been rigorously verified (Pais, 1994). The Dirac
theory (1934) required every charge to be surrounded by
unlimited numbers of the opposite charged ends of electron-positron
pairs (henceforth “epos”). Experiment verified that
the epos were both present and necessary.

So are you saying that virtual pairs decay in the absence of polarizing charge?