Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: When will we see a comet like Hale-Bopp again?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    659

    When will we see a comet like Hale-Bopp again?

    I remember in 1997 seeing the Comet Hale-Bopp in the sky. It was such a beautiful and inspiring sight. So when will we see another comet as visible to the naked eye like that again?

    Thanks
    Far away is close at hand in images of elsewhere...

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    1,511
    When another one comes around.

    Not all comets orbit the Sun, some are merely visitors to our Solar System.
    Others are on irregular orbits or on such long arcs that we can't tell when or if they'll be back again.

    You can't predict that.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    13,441
    Over the past century or so, a really spectacular comet seems to have come, to at least some observers, approx every 20 years.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    659
    Ok thanks
    Far away is close at hand in images of elsewhere...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Nereid View Post
    Over the past century or so, a really spectacular comet seems to have come, to at least some observers, approx every 20 years.
    So we have about ten to go?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by KaiYeves View Post
    So we have about ten to go?
    It could be ten years, or it could be thirty. There is a lot of scatter in the intervals between random events like these. Hale-Bopp followed Hyakutake by about a year, and then McNaught came along ten years later but was hard to see in the northern hemisphere. Comet West graced the sky twenty years before Hyakutake.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    12,256
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornblower View Post
    It could be ten years, or it could be thirty. There is a lot of scatter in the intervals between random events like these. Hale-Bopp followed Hyakutake by about a year, and then McNaught came along ten years later but was hard to see in the northern hemisphere. Comet West graced the sky twenty years before Hyakutake.
    I made a winking emoticon to show I was being silly.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Great White North(east)
    Posts
    555
    For some reason Hale-Bopp failed to impress Me, but the weather was absolutely the pits. Hyakutake however was a very nice sight, under dark skies quite the impressive vision, so far the best naked eye comet I've seen.
    The impossible often has a kind of integrity the merely improbable lacks. -Douglas Adams


  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    13,441
    Did anyone reading this see Ikeya-Seki (1965)?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    18,983
    Quote Originally Posted by Nereid View Post
    Did anyone reading this see Ikeya-Seki (1965)?
    I saw Ikeya-Seki, but not under favorable circumstances. My experience with Hale-Bopp was much better. Hyakutake was cool too, but it was over so quickly.
    Your earlier assessment that there are about five "comets of the century" every century seems about right.
    Forming opinions as we speak

  11. #11
    For a biased view - depending on whether one counts Halley and Kohoutek, there have been 6-8 bright memorable comets since I've been paying attention, so the average over this time has one every 6-8 years. This incorporates particular definitions of both qualifiers which may not apply for all observers...

    I just remember Ikeya-Seki - my father dragged my 7-year-old self out of bed before dawn, and I do remember the tail piercing up like a searchlight beam. I vaguely recall someone having a telescope at school to show us the head in daylight, but no memory of what it looked like. After that there were Bennett in 1970, Kohoutek in 1973 (had to work a bit, but saw it and even got pictures), West in 1976, Halley in 1986, Hyakutake in 1996, Hale-Bopp 1997, McNaught 2007. However, the list on Wikipedia shows that one has to go all the way back to 1927 to find something as bright as the two major comets of 1957 - once again, intuition doesn't do random well at all.

  12. #12
    Friends and I peered at Kohoutek when it came by in the early 1970s. That was such a bummer, just a tiny fuzzy ball in the telescope eyepiece. And it didn't even cause a cosmic disaster like the books said it would!

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Falls Church, VA (near Washington, DC)
    Posts
    4,013
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger E. Moore View Post
    Friends and I peered at Kohoutek when it came by in the early 1970s. That was such a bummer, just a tiny fuzzy ball in the telescope eyepiece. And it didn't even cause a cosmic disaster like the books said it would!
    What books?

  14. #14
    A paperback came out about 1973-1974 that I recall was in the college bookstores (I was a freshman) called The Comet Kohoutek. It was by an astrologer named (I think) Joseph Goodavage, and the cover blurbs had all sorts of dire predictions about the comet's effects. It looked as lame as it sounds.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    455
    I saw Ikeya-Seki from Albuquerque. I was pretty close to the Sun, so not visible for very long, but quite spectacular.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    13,441
    Somewhat OT: Hale-Bopp was, by some considerable margin, the largest comet to have entered the inner solar system, in the last half century or so, right?

    For sure, estimates of the size of cometary nuclei are fraught with considerable uncertainty, but IIRC only Halley came close to being as big as Hale-Bopp ...

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Great White North(east)
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by Nereid View Post
    Somewhat OT: Hale-Bopp was, by some considerable margin, the largest comet to have entered the inner solar system, in the last half century or so, right?

    For sure, estimates of the size of cometary nuclei are fraught with considerable uncertainty, but IIRC only Halley came close to being as big as Hale-Bopp ...
    I've read that 2006/C McNaught is now considered to have been the biggest known comet, but they're talking about "the size of the region of space disturbed by the comet’s presence" and not of the nucleus as per se. I suspect a very active comet with a smaller nucleus could be considered bigger than a larger one with a depleted nucleus.

    link here
    The impossible often has a kind of integrity the merely improbable lacks. -Douglas Adams


  18. #18
    This topic makes me wonder what the size would be of the largest theoretically possible comet nucleus. I was wondering if you'd get a huge cometary effect if a large Kuiper Belt Object made mostly of ice wandered close to the Sun.

  19. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger E. Moore View Post
    I was wondering if you'd get a huge cometary effect if a large Kuiper Belt Object made mostly of ice wandered close to the Sun.
    Sure, why not?

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    379
    Hyakutake was my first naked-eye comet, and I confess I thought it was pretty boring... And I observed it in good conditions almost at zenith.

    Hale-Bopp was incredible.

    I missed McNaught. I looked for it during the day when it passed close to the sun and was -6, but nothing doing...

    C 2001 Q4 NEAT, finally, was also quite a bummer. The nucleus was huge, it was discovered three years out - and then it was only visible to the naked eye under good conditions.

    Now, 17P/Holmes, that was something else, though of course not a traditional comet. I saw it after almost six weeks low over the northern horizon from ESO La Silla observatory in the Chilean Andes, and it was bigger than the full moon. Very impressive.

    But, yes, it could be another decade or two - or maybe just a year or two... until we get one like Hale-Bopp again. Remember McNaught was not discovered until something like 10 days before perihelion, IIRC.

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    10,172
    Here is a list of future comets and an estimate of their anticipated magnitude and max. altitude (h).

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Great White North(east)
    Posts
    555
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Alexander View Post
    Remember McNaught was not discovered until something like 10 days before perihelion, IIRC.
    6 months actually if you are talking about C/2006 P1, Comet McNaught
    The impossible often has a kind of integrity the merely improbable lacks. -Douglas Adams


  23. #23
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by Don Alexander View Post
    But, yes, it could be another decade or two - or maybe just a year or two... until we get one like Hale-Bopp again. Remember McNaught was not discovered until something like 10 days before perihelion, IIRC.
    Well thats some good news then, i can live in hope that it is a reasonable possibility, that i might get to see another bright comet like Hale-Bopp at some point in my life time
    Far away is close at hand in images of elsewhere...

Similar Threads

  1. Hale-Bopp
    By JR_M42 in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 2009-Apr-10, 01:59 AM
  2. Comet Hale-bopp
    By Sonia in forum Astrophotography
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2006-Jun-13, 05:56 PM
  3. Astrophoto: Comet Hale-Bopp
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-06, 10:59 PM
  4. Discussion: Astrophoto: Comet Hale-Bopp
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2005-Aug-31, 08:27 AM
  5. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2003-Sep-30, 07:52 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •