Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 33

Thread: DUCK! - Closest asteroid flyby ever

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,699

    DUCK! - Closest asteroid flyby ever

    Astro-Alert from Sky and Telescope:

    Less than 24 hours from the time this message is being issued, a tiny, newly discovered asteroid will make the closest flyby past Earth that has ever been predicted by astronomers.

    The object, dubbed 2004 FH, is probably only about 20 meters in diameter (the size of a house). An electronic circular issued late on March 17th by the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts, indicates that it will definitely not hit the Earth. It will pass about 49,000 kilometers (30,500 miles) from Earth's center, which is one-eighth the distance of the Moon.

    This object was discovered on March 16th by astronomers of MIT's Lincoln Near-Earth Asteroid Research (LINEAR) survey in Socorro, New Mexico. Further observations made on the 17th at Klet Observatory (Czech Republic), Starkenburg Observatory (Germany), and Modra Observatory (Slovenia) helped the Minor Planet Center compute its exact trajectory.

    The flyby scenario for 2004 FH goes like this:

    * At 18 hours Universal Time on March 18th, the asteroid will be 12th magnitude as it glides just south of the star Spica in Virgo, heading west.

    * By 22 hours UT on the 18th, it will have brightened to 10th magnitude when it passes closest to Earth in the constellation Antlia.

    * At 0 hours UT on March 19th -- which is around the time darkness falls on the East Coast of North America on Thursday, March 18th -- it will have faded back to 12th magnitude as it shoots by Sirius near the open star cluster Messier 41. By then it will be receding from Earth and heading back into space.

    Because 2004 FH will be passing so close, it is not practical for me to include a detailed ephemeris in this message. Its path across the sky depends greatly on an observer's vantage point on Earth (owing to the parallax effect). Observers who wish to locate it in small telescopes should use the Minor Planet Center's Ephemeris Service to make detailed predictions for their own geographic location:

    http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html

    According to the orbit calculated by Gareth Williams, associate director of the Minor Planet Center, 2004 FH belongs to the Aten class of asteroids. It circles the Sun in just under 9 months in very nearly the same plane as Earth's orbit. At perihelion it swings well inside the orbit of Venus; at aphelion (as currently) it ranges just outside that of the Earth.


    Roger W. Sinnott
    Senior Editor
    SKY & TELESCOPE
    [/quote]
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    Wow! Close call!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,992
    would this asteroid burn up int the earth's atmosphere?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    205
    Heh. Objects of this size 'hit the earth' every year, about once a month. On September 27th of last year, one passed within 88,000km. It is somewhat amusing that objects which pass closer and closer get a good deal of press, but the ones of similar size that hit us are not on the radar whatsoever.

    Of course, if it were up to me, both classes of objects would get the greater attention they deserve...hopefully the most important aspect of this, the very short lead time (understandable given the object's small size), and that of other such objects, impacting or not, will receive more than token press. It's really pretty disturbing.

    Ah, The Daily Show had a bit on Senda. Hmmm...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the "one a month" was for objects in the 5-10 meter range.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    Quote Originally Posted by Brady Yoon
    would this asteroid burn up int the earth's atmosphere?
    Depends on its composition.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    205
    The reports I've seen run from 10 to 15 a year, but I wouldn't suggest it is consistent by any means.

    And yes, the object would burn up if it were of a less dense composition. If not, small fragments may survive entry.

    As example, there was an object reported to be house-sized that entered the skies above spain on January 4th, 2004. Several fragments touched down as meteorites - one can be seen here. Another report, and some video of the fireball, can be found here.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    2,167
    The object, dubbed 2004 FH, is probably only about 20 meters in diameter (the size of a house).
    A two-story, 5 bedroom house, at least.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    And yes, the object would burn up if it were of a less dense composition. If not, small fragments may survive entry.
    A solid nickel-iron meteor that size would probably survive atmospheric entry pretty much intact. It would also make a good sized hole in the ground!

  10. #10
    The closer it gets, the bigger it gets. Now they say 30 meters in diameter. That's more than 3 times bigger than 20 meters (in volume).

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    16,686
    Quote Originally Posted by tracer
    The object, dubbed 2004 FH, is probably only about 20 meters in diameter (the size of a house).
    A two-story, 5 bedroom house, at least.
    Well, depends on which state is your baseline. In Alabama that would be a decent-sized, repossessed doublewide with green pine deck, which would, of course, burn to bits in the upper reaches of the ionosphere.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    16,686
    Remember, the vast majority of these that make it to the surface either land in an ocean or in a remote, unpopulated area. One of these days, though...

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    548
    I heard that this one in particular was only 100 feet, is that right

  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by bmpbmp
    I heard that this one in particular was only 100 feet, is that right
    100 feet is 30 meters, which is 10 meters larger than the 20 meters stated in the original posting and the same as stated just a few posts above you ;-)

    I dont understand the "was only", which makes it appear like you feel 100 feet is less than 20 or 30 meters

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    284
    I was trying to see if it would be visible here when dark comes, but I think it will making its return to space around dusk. According to this anyway. I think my astro-alert said the brightest would be Mag 10.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    168
    Darnit! I wont be able to watch it go by from here.

  17. #17
    A solid nickel-iron meteor that size would probably survive atmospheric entry pretty much intact. It would also make a good sized hole in the ground!
    How big! I mean, what would happen if this nickel-iron met hit the ground near a populated area. There is any study about the composition of 2004 FH?

  18. #18
    Astronomer Steve Chesley of JPL (on CNN):
    The important thing is not that it's happening, but that we detected it
    CNN story
    Similarly sized asteroids are believed to come as close to Earth on average once every two years, but have always escaped detection.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    205
    Hmmm - well, there are at least 3 in the last 6 that I can think of off the top of my head, mentioned in this post - once every two years is not accurate at all. Very odd.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    195
    So what happens after the trajectory shifts 15deg.?
    http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...by_040318.html

    Does it go around the sun and come straight at us next year?

    Or, will it take a few more passes?

    I wanna see fireworks

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    7,794
    I wanna see fireworks
    I wanna be far enough away to be able to say "What was that?" :wink:

  22. #22
    Ah, The Daily Show had a bit on Senda. Hmmm...
    heh heh...I saw that too...most excellent.

  23. #23
    The koo koo´s and the woo woo´s are having a feelday over this on GLP

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    The beautiful north coast (Ohio)
    Posts
    35,289
    CNN.com's poll today was "Do you worry about an asteroid hitting Earth?". As of 3:37 EST, about 143,000 people had responded and only 14% said yes. I guess its good that the majority don't worry, but its not good to convince the governement to fund NEO research.
    At night the stars put on a show for free (Carole King)

    All moderation in purple - The rules

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    982
    This would be an interesting test to see if we could launch a missile and hit it. I'm sure theres an ICBM laying around somewhere. It would be fantastic to try to hit it and observe what happens.

  26. #26
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    292
    I've tried to calculate how much energy the thing would deliver assuming it's 100 ft in diameter and traveling at 24 miles per second.

    If it's made of rock, it would be carrying about 6.7 megatons worth of kinetic energy as it reached the upper atmosphere. If it were iron, that would rise to about 21 megatons.

    In Richard Norton's book, "Rocks from Space", there's a chart that shows that a 1000 ton object, about 4 times smaller than this object, would retain 70% of it's initial velocity on impact. Another chart shows that at this speed, about 55% of the original mass could be retained to the ground. Assuming that the rock could reach the ground, it would deliver about 1.8 megatons...this probably wouldn't happen, though, since most rocky meteoroids blow apart high in the atmosphere. There'd be a big light show and a good shock wave, but probably no impact. The iron would be a different story. It would hold together very nicely and deliver about 5.3 megatons of energy on impact...instant tourist attraction.

    A big iron meteorite struck in the Sikhote-Alin region of the Soviet Union on 12 February 1947...the biggest crater was about 87 feet in diameter and 20 feet deep; but the meteorite that caused this damage was much smaller than the one that missed us today.

    Arithmetic errors and such aside...I'm glad it missed!

  27. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,699
    You can play around with speeds, sizes, and types on this page. A couple of quick entries gives a Tunguska-style atmospheric explosion for an ice or rock meteor of the given size, and a close to 1-km crater for an iron one.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  28. #28
    thanks for the great link ToSeek

  29. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    28,699
    Quote Originally Posted by hedin
    thanks for the great link ToSeek
    It's one of my favorites. If you want to get Marvin mad, though, send a 9999 km iron asteroid into Mars.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  30. #30
    LOL reminds me of Marvin The Paranoid Android from Hitchhiker´s Guide to The Galaxy

Similar Threads

  1. Follow Closest Flyby of Phobos in Real Time
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Mar-02, 07:20 PM
  2. Closest Asteroid to the Sun Found
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-12, 06:02 PM
  3. Cassini Set for Closest Titan Flyby
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2005-Sep-09, 06:33 PM
  4. Discussion: Cassini Set for Closest Titan Flyby
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2005-Apr-14, 04:47 PM
  5. Discussion: Closest Asteroid To The Sun Found
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2004-May-22, 04:38 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •