Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: More Nancy nonsense

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    29,101

    More Nancy nonsense

    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    29,101
    Nancy's Zetatalk page, if you want to avoid GLP, though you're still risking your sanity in reading it.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ, US
    Posts
    1,065
    Doesn't she know that's obviously a UFO in the SOHO images? With that disk sitting out to the sides, conveniently lined up perfectly for the camera? What was she thinking? Venus? I mean, really. :roll: :wink:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    388
    I wouldn’t know where to look for the numbers, but I am sure you could determine the size of that object and compare it to Mercury and Venus to prove which one it is.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    992
    http://ares.nrl.navy.mil/sungrazer/transits_2004.html

    Looks like it's right on time and direction to be Mercury.

    I think she has finally shot herself in the foot.

    The Zetas can't even tell the difference between the two planets?

    She'll probably have to invent another translation error..... :-? :^o

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    992
    Well come June, everyone will know that Venus is right where it should be also.

    It still won't make a dent in the believers, though.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by LTC8K6
    Well come June, everyone will know that Venus is right where it should be also.

    It still won't make a dent in the believers, though.
    Unfortnuatly not, they will start saying that all planets and moons have reversed their orbits. :roll:

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Drakheim
    Quote Originally Posted by LTC8K6
    Well come June, everyone will know that Venus is right where it should be also.

    It still won't make a dent in the believers, though.
    Unfortnuatly not, they will start saying that all planets and moons have reversed their orbits. :roll:
    Yep. And they'll forget that not *only* did all the planets reverse their orbits, but all the planets flipped 180 degrees as well, so the transit still goes in the right direction....

    Sigh...

    Jonathan
    -It doesn't matter what I believe. What matters is what I can prove.-

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    29,101
    Nancy scrambles for cover with new Zetatalk: Jerking Nancy Around (Yes, that is her title.)
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek
    Nancy scrambles for cover with new Zetatalk: Jerking Nancy Around (Yes, that is her title.)
    Man...Nan...uhh....ZETANs need to brush up on their collective grammar.

    Poor Nancy 8-[. Why do they put her through all this turmoil?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    116
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek
    Nancy scrambles for cover with new Zetatalk: Jerking Nancy Around (Yes, that is her title.)
    Nancy's psychosis has found a way to cope with reality. She can now comfortably predict any event and has a handy escape route if (if? - when) it doesn't happen. Rather than deal with reality, as most of us must, she bends reality to match her thoughts. If I write a check that bounces, it means I made an error in my check book calculations; if Nancy did, she would be convinced that the Zetans had gone on a spending spree.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    388

    But then again mabye this is a good thing. If Nancy is turning into a de-bunker of her peers, mabye she will eventually give it all up.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    111
    Seriously, who posts more about Nancy L. on BABB?
    Woowoos, or Nancy Bashers? My answer's the latter.

    Look y'all, I'm just trying to help. I know y'all have
    better things to do with your energy than continually
    generate dozens of posts and threads about Nancy.
    I'm willing to bet that you exacerbate your problem.

    Personally, no I don't believe what Nancy/ZT says.

    Why not just let other people mention her, and then
    debunk them? Why play the game with each other?
    Really, how much benefit do y'all skim off the top of
    a nasty kettle of year-old soup y'all keep stirring???

    When people who are good at something, like skeet
    shooting, do it for fun, that's called "target practice".

    And y'all sure are good at "bustin' a cap" at Nancy.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    348
    What's she's doing is smart, at least from a woo-woo point of view. What she's doing is saying that Venus is transiting now, so that when the real event occurs in June, she can say something along the lines of "How can Venus be in the same position twice in a few months. The first event must have been Venus, so the one that will occur in June must be PX, not Venus as the evil Gubbment would have us believe".

    I know that Mercury is really only transiting from SOHO's point of view, but by June, everyone who believes in this woo-woo stuff will have forgotten, and Nancy will simply say that, in early March, "Venus" transited the Sun instead.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    29,101
    Quote Originally Posted by Human Being
    Seriously, who posts more about Nancy L. on BABB?
    Woowoos, or Nancy Bashers? My answer's the latter.
    Oh, absolutely. Even on GLP and tt-watch, you can count on the fingers of one hand the people who still support her. Most of them fell away after the "white lie," and the rest have been drifting away as time goes by and nothing happens.

    Look y'all, I'm just trying to help. I know y'all have
    better things to do with your energy than continually
    generate dozens of posts and threads about Nancy.
    I'm willing to bet that you exacerbate your problem.
    Okay, I admit it's an addiction, but at least it's better than smoking, alcohol, or gambling.

    I have to confess to a perverse fascination with Nancy, and I just wonder how long it will take her to finally give up. She's claiming on GLP that the shift will "probably" occur before the transit in June, but I'd be very surprised if she gave up then. I think it's going to take a couple of years.
    Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    992
    HB, essentially, this forum is for debunking Planet X.

    It is obvious that debunkers should greatly outnumber believers here and elsewhere on the Bad Astronomy site.

    How could it be any other way?

    The PX believers are unable to defend their beliefs anyway, so it's obvious that they will be scarce wherever they are subject to embarrassing questions, and plentiful wherever questions are not asked.

    I suppose you also find it odd that moon landing hoax bashers outnumber believers in the lunar conspiracies area as well?

  17. #17
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,653
    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek
    Quote Originally Posted by Human Being
    Seriously, who posts more about Nancy L. on BABB?
    Woowoos, or Nancy Bashers? My answer's the latter.
    Oh, absolutely. Even on GLP and tt-watch, you can count on the fingers of one hand the people who still support her. Most of them fell away after the "white lie," and the rest have been drifting away as time goes by and nothing happens.

    Look y'all, I'm just trying to help. I know y'all have
    better things to do with your energy than continually
    generate dozens of posts and threads about Nancy.
    I'm willing to bet that you exacerbate your problem.
    Okay, I admit it's an addiction, but at least it's better than smoking, alcohol, or gambling.

    I have to confess to a perverse fascination with Nancy, and I just wonder how long it will take her to finally give up. She's claiming on GLP that the shift will "probably" occur before the transit in June, but I'd be very surprised if she gave up then. I think it's going to take a couple of years.
    Nancy will NEVER give up until circumstances (incarceration, lack of funds, etc.) physically compell her to do so. That is the nature of her delusion. Her Zetababble is continuing its trend of becoming more bizarre as she "reaches" for explanations as to why nothing has happened, and she will continue in that vein. She CAN'T quit. (And HB, before you fire off a challenge, I know that you have probably not seen my prior postings, so FYI, among my other qualifications, I AM professionally qualified to discuss abnormal psychological conditions.)

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    1,022

    Re: More Nancy nonsense

    Quote Originally Posted by ToSeek
    Isn't that pathetic beyond belief?

    She later is forced to admit it was Mercury, but according to Zeta 'logic', we're supposed to take some wisdom from that error/lie.

    She is certainly truly coming unravelled.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,372
    Quote Originally Posted by Human Being
    I know y'all have
    better things to do with your energy than continually
    generate dozens of posts and threads about Nancy.
    Nope. Not me. You've seriously overestimated my life.
    Quote Originally Posted by Human Being
    When people who are good at something, like skeet
    shooting, do it for fun, that's called "target practice".
    I call it Zeta practice!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    4,273
    Isn't it redundant to say "Nancy nonsense"?

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    585
    Nancy's latest - Polaris isn't where it's supposed to be. Confirmed by Jan Rypdal (her ex-internal auditor for Troubled Times).

    Seems that Jan took his new LX200 out and centered Polaris in the FOV of the finderscope (he called it a guide scope), and didn't turn on the drive motors -

    - and lo and behold, Polaris had moved in the period of an hour! So he re-centered Polaris, and came back an hour later, and it had moved again!

    The claim: Since Polaris is at the celestial pole, it should stay centered in EP forever if the scope isn't turned on, and Nancy therefore claims that the Earth has tilted.



    Someone needs to tell Jan the coordinates of Polaris.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    2,258
    Looks like a certain person with an LX200 needs to read the manual.

    http://www.meade.com/manuals/lx200/d.html#d3b

    Tom Mosher
    (telescope in storage)[/url]

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    535
    From: Metatron (ip deleted by boppa..)
    Subject: Rotation stopage and gravity + some other thoughts
    Date: September 9, 2005 at 7:25 am PST

    If this planet x stops the rotation of the earth so there is
    either long days of darkness or long days of sunlight , how
    would there be survivors left on the surface of the planet if
    there is no gravity to weight us down ? I wont claim to have
    any superior knowledge of science other than that taught in
    high school , but to me if the planet stops spinning , gravity
    ceases to exist , and the suttleist jolt up would mean floating
    up into the atmosphere ...

    latest from nancys `forum'

    `hi' `skool' obviously didnt include basic science or english courses..
    really can any single post have so many misconceptions?
    R.I.P. Bad Astronomy

Similar Threads

  1. UFO nonsense?
    By webplodder in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 2011-Mar-05, 08:23 PM
  2. 3N (New Nonsense from Nancy)
    By Sammy in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 2004-Feb-13, 12:37 AM
  3. Nancy recants...uhh, decants...uhh, Nancy does something...
    By Charlie in Dayton in forum Against the Mainstream
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 2003-Apr-18, 11:05 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
here
The forum is sponsored in-part by: