That's Venus transiting SOHO right now, not Mercury
WARNING: GLP thread
That's Venus transiting SOHO right now, not Mercury
WARNING: GLP thread
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Nancy's Zetatalk page, if you want to avoid GLP, though you're still risking your sanity in reading it.
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Doesn't she know that's obviously a UFO in the SOHO images? With that disk sitting out to the sides, conveniently lined up perfectly for the camera? What was she thinking? Venus? I mean, really. :roll: :wink:
I wouldn’t know where to look for the numbers, but I am sure you could determine the size of that object and compare it to Mercury and Venus to prove which one it is.
http://ares.nrl.navy.mil/sungrazer/transits_2004.html
Looks like it's right on time and direction to be Mercury.
I think she has finally shot herself in the foot.
The Zetas can't even tell the difference between the two planets?
She'll probably have to invent another translation error..... :-? :^o
Well come June, everyone will know that Venus is right where it should be also.
It still won't make a dent in the believers, though.
Unfortnuatly not, they will start saying that all planets and moons have reversed their orbits. :roll:Originally Posted by LTC8K6
Yep. And they'll forget that not *only* did all the planets reverse their orbits, but all the planets flipped 180 degrees as well, so the transit still goes in the right direction....Originally Posted by Drakheim
Sigh...
Jonathan
-It doesn't matter what I believe. What matters is what I can prove.-
Nancy scrambles for cover with new Zetatalk: Jerking Nancy Around (Yes, that is her title.)
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
Man...Nan...uhh....ZETANs need to brush up on their collective grammar.Originally Posted by ToSeek
Poor Nancy 8-[. Why do they put her through all this turmoil?
Nancy's psychosis has found a way to cope with reality. She can now comfortably predict any event and has a handy escape route if (if? - when) it doesn't happen. Rather than deal with reality, as most of us must, she bends reality to match her thoughts. If I write a check that bounces, it means I made an error in my check book calculations; if Nancy did, she would be convinced that the Zetans had gone on a spending spree.Originally Posted by ToSeek
But then again mabye this is a good thing. If Nancy is turning into a de-bunker of her peers, mabye she will eventually give it all up.
Seriously, who posts more about Nancy L. on BABB?
Woowoos, or Nancy Bashers? My answer's the latter.
Look y'all, I'm just trying to help. I know y'all have
better things to do with your energy than continually
generate dozens of posts and threads about Nancy.
I'm willing to bet that you exacerbate your problem.
Personally, no I don't believe what Nancy/ZT says.
Why not just let other people mention her, and then
debunk them? Why play the game with each other?
Really, how much benefit do y'all skim off the top of
a nasty kettle of year-old soup y'all keep stirring???
When people who are good at something, like skeet
shooting, do it for fun, that's called "target practice".
And y'all sure are good at "bustin' a cap" at Nancy.
What's she's doing is smart, at least from a woo-woo point of view. What she's doing is saying that Venus is transiting now, so that when the real event occurs in June, she can say something along the lines of "How can Venus be in the same position twice in a few months. The first event must have been Venus, so the one that will occur in June must be PX, not Venus as the evil Gubbment would have us believe".
I know that Mercury is really only transiting from SOHO's point of view, but by June, everyone who believes in this woo-woo stuff will have forgotten, and Nancy will simply say that, in early March, "Venus" transited the Sun instead.
Oh, absolutely. Even on GLP and tt-watch, you can count on the fingers of one hand the people who still support her. Most of them fell away after the "white lie," and the rest have been drifting away as time goes by and nothing happens.Originally Posted by Human Being
Okay, I admit it's an addiction, but at least it's better than smoking, alcohol, or gambling.Look y'all, I'm just trying to help. I know y'all have
better things to do with your energy than continually
generate dozens of posts and threads about Nancy.
I'm willing to bet that you exacerbate your problem.
I have to confess to a perverse fascination with Nancy, and I just wonder how long it will take her to finally give up. She's claiming on GLP that the shift will "probably" occur before the transit in June, but I'd be very surprised if she gave up then. I think it's going to take a couple of years.
Everything I need to know I learned through Googling.
HB, essentially, this forum is for debunking Planet X.
It is obvious that debunkers should greatly outnumber believers here and elsewhere on the Bad Astronomy site.
How could it be any other way?
The PX believers are unable to defend their beliefs anyway, so it's obvious that they will be scarce wherever they are subject to embarrassing questions, and plentiful wherever questions are not asked.
I suppose you also find it odd that moon landing hoax bashers outnumber believers in the lunar conspiracies area as well?
Nancy will NEVER give up until circumstances (incarceration, lack of funds, etc.) physically compell her to do so. That is the nature of her delusion. Her Zetababble is continuing its trend of becoming more bizarre as she "reaches" for explanations as to why nothing has happened, and she will continue in that vein. She CAN'T quit. (And HB, before you fire off a challenge, I know that you have probably not seen my prior postings, so FYI, among my other qualifications, I AM professionally qualified to discuss abnormal psychological conditions.)Originally Posted by ToSeek
Isn't that pathetic beyond belief?Originally Posted by ToSeek
She later is forced to admit it was Mercury, but according to Zeta 'logic', we're supposed to take some wisdom from that error/lie.
She is certainly truly coming unravelled.
Nope. Not me. You've seriously overestimated my life.Originally Posted by Human Being
![]()
I call it Zeta practice!Originally Posted by Human Being
![]()
Isn't it redundant to say "Nancy nonsense"?![]()
Nancy's latest - Polaris isn't where it's supposed to be. Confirmed by Jan Rypdal (her ex-internal auditor for Troubled Times).
Seems that Jan took his new LX200 out and centered Polaris in the FOV of the finderscope (he called it a guide scope), and didn't turn on the drive motors -
- and lo and behold, Polaris had moved in the period of an hour! So he re-centered Polaris, and came back an hour later, and it had moved again!
The claim: Since Polaris is at the celestial pole, it should stay centered in EP forever if the scope isn't turned on, and Nancy therefore claims that the Earth has tilted.
Someone needs to tell Jan the coordinates of Polaris.
Looks like a certain person with an LX200 needs to read the manual.
http://www.meade.com/manuals/lx200/d.html#d3b
Tom Mosher
(telescope in storage)[/url]
From: Metatron (ip deleted by boppa..)
Subject: Rotation stopage and gravity + some other thoughts
Date: September 9, 2005 at 7:25 am PST
If this planet x stops the rotation of the earth so there is
either long days of darkness or long days of sunlight , how
would there be survivors left on the surface of the planet if
there is no gravity to weight us down ? I wont claim to have
any superior knowledge of science other than that taught in
high school , but to me if the planet stops spinning , gravity
ceases to exist , and the suttleist jolt up would mean floating
up into the atmosphere ...
latest from nancys `forum'
`hi' `skool' obviously didnt include basic science or english courses..
really can any single post have so many misconceptions?
R.I.P. Bad Astronomy