Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Heat Rejection Systems

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    451

    Heat Rejection Systems

    I ran across an equation that describes how much waste heat a radiator can drain away from a station or spacecraft.

    ∂Q/∂t = Re * (5.67x10e-8) * Ra * Rt^4

    ∂Q/∂t = amount of waste heat to get rid of (watts)
    5.67x10e-8 = Stefan's Constant
    Re = emissivity of radiator (theoretical maximum is 1.0)
    Ra = area of radiator (m2)
    Rt = temperature of radiator (degrees K)

    My question primarily has to do with the third value there, "emissivity". I only found one existing HRS, the ones used on the ISS (http://www.lockheedmartin.com/produc...ors/index.html), but they didn't give any such value.

    What is a typical emissivity rating for radiators? And is it measured using something called black bodies?


    I found a wiki article that explains the Stefan Constant (or... tries to explain it anyway), but the math is beyond me. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan%...zmann_constant

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    5,448
    The emissivity comes from the fact that an object dosent emit radiation as a perfect black body. The calculations you have are for blackbody radiation, but in a real object, certain bands of frequency are not available for emission. This means that the object emits less radiation at any temperature than the perfect blackbody.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    1,467
    An on-line calculator for heat radiation can be found here: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...stefan.html#c2

    I don't know typical emissivity for actual spacecraft radiators, but various materials can have emissivity of 0.9 in certain spectral regions, vs 1.0 of an ideal black body. See page 18.05 of this 1MB .pdf: http://ahlborn.pl/pdf/21/karta21.pdf

    This makes me think a purpose-built radiator would have relativity good emissivity in the spectral region it's designed for.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    451
    So 0.9 is at least viable with current technology?
    That's good, I was worried that it might be like solar panels, in that we might be stuck at 0.15 or something.

    ALSO:
    Thanks for that calculator thing, looks like it could be very useful in my brainstorming sessions.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,307
    Here's a list for some common materials:

    http://www.infrared-thermography.com/material.htm

Similar Threads

  1. Hot water systems - heat pumps v solar
    By Peter B in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2008-Jun-25, 11:29 AM
  2. Men, women, and rejection
    By folkhemmet in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 2006-Nov-29, 09:14 PM
  3. the nature of rejection
    By folkhemmet in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2005-Nov-30, 03:04 AM
  4. Science Project Rejection: BB Guns Can Be Dangerous
    By 01101001 in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 2005-Jun-13, 07:53 PM
  5. Lunar Module Heat rejection
    By robert_d in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 2004-Sep-23, 04:36 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •