View Full Version : A very interesting image
AstroMike
2002-Feb-07, 03:50 AM
I found this image, which I thought was pretty interesting.
It's a photomontage showing the relative sizes of the terrestrial planets and the six largest satellites.
http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/DAAC_DOCS/geomorphology/GEO_10/geo_images_10/Fig10.1.jpeg
I think it's neat!
_________________
"The contemplation of celestial things will make man both speak and think more sublimely and magnificently when he descends to human affairs." -Marcus Cicero
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AstroMike on 2002-02-13 00:17 ]</font>
MongotheGreat
2002-Feb-07, 04:05 AM
I can't help but notice that Titan appears larger than Ganymede. Why is that? Isn't Ganymede supposed to be larger than Titan?
Nice picture, by the way./phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif
Mongo
AstroMike
2002-Feb-07, 04:13 AM
Mongo, Titan is seen with its cloud cover which is about 300 km thicker than the solid body. The solid body of Titan is 5,150 km in diameter; Ganymede is 5,268 km in diameter.
By the way, I apologize that it's a black and white picture. A color image would be cooler, but I haven't found one yet.
_________________
"The contemplation of celestial things will make man both speak and think more sublimely and magnificently when he descends to human affairs." -Marcus Cicero
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: AstroMike on 2002-02-06 23:15 ]</font>
GrapesOfWrath
2002-Feb-07, 06:55 AM
Yahbut they resized the images according to size. I checked the pixel sizes of the images, and Titan's image doesn't seem to be bigger than Ganymede's.
James
2002-Feb-07, 12:14 PM
On 2002-02-06 22:50, AstroMike wrote:
I found this image, which I thought was pretty interesting.
It's a photomontage showing the relative sizes of the terrestrial planets and the six largest satellites.
http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/DAAC_DOCS/geomorphology/GEO_10/geo_images_10/Fig10.1.jpeg
Beautiful. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_eek.gif /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_cool.gif /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif
Yahbut they resized the images according to size. I checked the pixel sizes of the images, and Titan's image doesn't seem to be bigger than Ganymede's.
I think it's the shadow on Titan's right side that's throwing everyone. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_confused.gif
_________________
"It is possible to store the mind with a million facts and still be entirely uneducated." -- Alec Bourne
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: James on 2002-02-07 07:16 ]</font>
GrapesOfWrath
2002-Feb-07, 12:20 PM
On 2002-02-07 07:14, James wrote:
I think it's the shadow on Titan's right side that's throwing everyone.
Yeah, I guess so. You can use your imagination to make it bigger.
CJSF
2002-Feb-07, 12:52 PM
Regarding Ganymede and Titan:
I did a "quick and dirty" comparison using Paint Shop Pro and it appears that they are about the same pixel size - which would make sense. Their diameters are so close that at the scale of the images you are talking a mere couple of pixels at most.
Titan is 98% the size of Ganymede - The measurement I get of Ganymede is 96 pixels wide. That would make the image of Titan, if it were a full disk, 94 pixels wide. Throw in the shadow and the indistinct edges and they appear the same size.
_________________
"Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never,
ever get it out."
--Thomas Cardinal Wolsey (1471-1530)
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: Christopher Ferro on 2002-02-07 07:56 ]</font>
aurorae
2002-Feb-07, 03:49 PM
This is a cool picture. Even if it looks like Mars split in half. /phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif
It made me look up some numbers, since off the top of my head I would have guessed that Triton was larger than Io or Europa (it isn't).
Wiley
2002-Feb-07, 05:05 PM
Thanks for the pic, AstroMike.
It's always amazing to see how large Jupiter's moons actually are. And then its also amazing to see how relatively large our Moon (note: the capital M) is.
Thanks again.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.