View Full Version : PX spies
I have been wondering: How many spies do you think Nancy employs to search boards like this to find poor pics and wrong facts?
Like she sees us seriously debunking a pic and then takes that pic off with her own debunking. Than she sees us complaining about not being able to see it in a certain area of the sky and then she suddenly comes up with a excuse like a nebula is covering up PX or something like that.
So how many think we are being sped upon?
girl101
2003-Apr-23, 04:41 PM
I wouldn't care if they were here, I would only care if they came, looked around, and left without answering some of the questions we pose on a daily basis that only they could answer. :)
Girl 101
Greenhalgh
2003-Apr-23, 04:52 PM
Someone who represents Nancy *must* visit this forum. She is constantly gleaning info off sci.astro and Godlike Productions forums too.
John Jones
2003-Apr-23, 05:08 PM
Just yesterday, some zetadrone sock-puppet claimed on sci.astro to have seen PX, and Imaging Team Member Steve Havas pounced on this as "Wow! The first sci.astro confirmation of a PX sighting".
As if these Zetacult members haven't been doing this for years.
Grand Vizier
2003-Apr-23, 05:09 PM
Someone who represents Nancy *must* visit this forum. She is constantly gleaning info off sci.astro and Godlike Productions forums too.
Slight difference with sci.astro - not only does Nancy have an obsession with that group, but the trawls/trolls by her and her 'drones were (still are!) quite active - the idea was to provoke posts that, out of context, could be re-edited to seem to agree with her, or at least to show that she was taken seriously by real astronomers. (An example is how she tried to use John Oliver's work to show how PX was real, when it showed there was no real evidence there). I think most people cottoned on eventually, so now Zeta posts are generally treated with contempt and levity.
gethen
2003-Apr-23, 07:00 PM
Yeah, somebodies must be keeping an eye on things over here. Tezzer/Hardee? I think that seeing their ideas here, even in the context of their being laughed at, somehow makes them feel important. Same thing with sci.astro. Heck, these weinies probably feel getting mentioned here or on sci.astro validates them! So......Hi Nancy! How's it goin'? Started any good hoaxes lately?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.